• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初始血糖管理系统给药策略对达标血糖范围时间的影响。

Impact of Initial eGlycemic Management System Dosing Strategy on Time to Target Blood Glucose Range.

机构信息

Novant Health System, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Wingate University School of Pharmacy, Wingate, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):242-250. doi: 10.1177/1932296821992352. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1177/1932296821992352
PMID:33588608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8256082/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glucommander™ (GM), an electronic glycemic management system, was implemented across a multi-hospital health system as the standard of care for glycemic control. GM provides insulin dosing recommendations based on patient-specific blood glucose (BG) trends after providers select either a custom dose or weight-based multiplier as the initial dosing strategy for the first 24 hours. This study evaluated the impact of initial subcutaneous (SC) GM insulin dosing strategies on glycemic management.

METHODS

Non-intensive care unit patients treated with SC GM using either initial custom (based on provider discretion) or weight-based multiplier settings (0.3, 0.5, or 0.7 units/kg/day) were evaluated in this retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint was time to target BG range defined as time to first two consecutive in range point of care BG. Secondary endpoints included percentage of BG values in target range, percentage of orders following institutional recommendations, length of stay (LOS), average BG, and incidence of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia.

RESULTS

A review of 348 patients showed time to target BG was not significantly different between custom and multiplier groups (55 vs 64 hours, = .07). Target BG was achieved in less than half of patients in both groups (47% vs 44%, respectively). There were no differences in hospital LOS, proportion of BG in target range, rates of hypo/hyperglycemia, and average BG.

CONCLUSIONS

Custom initial SC GM insulin dosing settings showed a nonsignificant decrease in time to target BG range compared to pre-defined multiplier settings. Future studies evaluating the impact of compliance with institutional recommendations on BG control are warranted.

摘要

背景

Glucommander™(GM)是一种电子血糖管理系统,在一个多医院医疗系统中被作为血糖控制的标准护理措施实施。GM 根据患者特定的血糖(BG)趋势提供胰岛素剂量建议,在提供者选择初始剂量策略时(定制剂量或体重倍数),在前 24 小时内使用。本研究评估了初始皮下(SC)GM 胰岛素给药策略对血糖管理的影响。

方法

本回顾性图表研究评估了使用初始定制(根据提供者的判断)或体重倍数设置(0.3、0.5 或 0.7 单位/千克/天)的 SC GM 治疗的非重症监护病房患者。主要终点是达到目标 BG 范围的时间,定义为首次连续两次在范围内的即时 BG 点的时间。次要终点包括目标范围内的 BG 值百分比、遵循机构建议的医嘱百分比、住院时间(LOS)、平均 BG 以及低血糖和高血糖的发生率。

结果

对 348 例患者的回顾显示,定制组和倍数组达到目标 BG 的时间无显著差异(55 小时对 64 小时, =.07)。两组均不到一半的患者达到目标 BG(分别为 47%和 44%)。两组患者的 LOS、目标范围内的 BG 比例、低血糖/高血糖发生率以及平均 BG 均无差异。

结论

与预定义的倍数设置相比,初始 SC GM 胰岛素的定制剂量设定在达到目标 BG 范围方面表现出非显著减少。需要进一步研究评估遵循机构建议对 BG 控制的影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of Initial eGlycemic Management System Dosing Strategy on Time to Target Blood Glucose Range.初始血糖管理系统给药策略对达标血糖范围时间的影响。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):242-250. doi: 10.1177/1932296821992352. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Safely Converting an Entire Academic Medical Center From Sliding Scale to Basal Bolus Insulin via Implementation of the eGlycemic Management System.通过实施电子血糖管理系统,安全地将整个学术医疗中心从滑动比例胰岛素治疗转换为基础-餐时胰岛素治疗。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):53-59. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747619. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Comparison of an Electronic Glycemic Management System Versus Provider-Managed Subcutaneous Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy in the Hospital Setting.医院环境中电子血糖管理系统与医护人员管理的皮下基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):12-16. doi: 10.1177/1932296816664746. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
4
Reliability of Inpatient CGM: Comparison to Standard of Care.住院患者连续血糖监测的可靠性:与常规护理的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):329-335. doi: 10.1177/19322968211062168. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
5
USE OF A COMPUTER-GUIDED GLUCOSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO IMPROVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND ADDRESS NATIONAL QUALITY MEASURES: A 7-YEAR, RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AT A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL.使用计算机引导的血糖管理系统改善血糖控制并满足国家质量指标:在一家三级护理教学医院进行的为期7年的回顾性观察研究。
Endocr Pract. 2017 Mar;23(3):331-341. doi: 10.4158/EP161402.OR. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
6
Comparison of Computer-Guided Versus Standard Insulin Infusion Regimens in Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis.糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者中计算机引导与标准胰岛素输注方案的比较
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1932296817750899.
7
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of an eGlycemic Management System in a Community Hospital Setting.评价一种电子血糖管理系统在社区医院环境中的疗效和安全性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):236-241. doi: 10.1177/1932296820980026. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Risk of Hypoglycemia During Insulin Infusion Directed by Paper Protocol Versus Electronic Glycemic Management System in Critically Ill Patients at a Large Academic Medical Center.在一家大型学术医疗中心,针对重症患者,纸质方案指导的胰岛素输注与电子血糖管理系统指导的胰岛素输注过程中发生低血糖的风险。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747617. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
9
GLYCEMIC OUTCOMES 3 YEARS AFTER IMPLEMENTATION OF A PERI-OPERATIVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL ALGORITHM IN AN ACADEMIC INSTITUTION.学术机构实施围手术期血糖控制算法3年后的血糖结果
Endocr Pract. 2017 Feb;23(2):123-131. doi: 10.4158/EP161354.OR. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
10
Computerized intensive insulin dosing can mitigate hypoglycemia and achieve tight glycemic control when glucose measurement is performed frequently and on time.当血糖测量频繁且按时进行时,计算机化强化胰岛素剂量可以减轻低血糖并实现严格的血糖控制。
Crit Care. 2009;13(5):R163. doi: 10.1186/cc8129. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Decision Support for Perioperative Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Call to Action.2型糖尿病患者围手术期护理的数字决策支持:行动呼吁
JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Apr 8;10:e70475. doi: 10.2196/70475.
2
Glycemic targets in critically ill adults: A mini-review.危重症成年患者的血糖目标:一篇综述短文
World J Diabetes. 2021 Oct 15;12(10):1719-1730. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i10.1719.

本文引用的文献

1
15. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: .15. 医院中的糖尿病护理:。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S193-S202. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S015.
2
7. Diabetes Technology: .7. 糖尿病技术:。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S77-S88. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S007.
3
Subcutaneous Insulin Dosing Calculators for Inpatient Glucose Control.皮下胰岛素给药计算器在住院血糖控制中的应用。
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Nov 4;19(11):120. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1254-y.
4
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S61-S70. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S006.
5
Comparison of Computer-Guided Versus Standard Insulin Infusion Regimens in Patients With Diabetic Ketoacidosis.糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者中计算机引导与标准胰岛素输注方案的比较
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1932296817750899.
6
Safely Converting an Entire Academic Medical Center From Sliding Scale to Basal Bolus Insulin via Implementation of the eGlycemic Management System.通过实施电子血糖管理系统,安全地将整个学术医疗中心从滑动比例胰岛素治疗转换为基础-餐时胰岛素治疗。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):53-59. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747619. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
Comparison of an Electronic Glycemic Management System Versus Provider-Managed Subcutaneous Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy in the Hospital Setting.医院环境中电子血糖管理系统与医护人员管理的皮下基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):12-16. doi: 10.1177/1932296816664746. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
8
Sulfonylureas and their use in clinical practice.磺脲类药物及其在临床实践中的应用。
Arch Med Sci. 2015 Aug 12;11(4):840-8. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.53304. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
9
Withdrawal of sulfonylureas from patients with type 2 diabetes receiving long-term sulfonylurea and insulin combination therapy results in deterioration of glycemic control: a randomized controlled trial.接受磺酰脲类药物和胰岛素长期联合治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者停用磺酰脲类药物会导致血糖控制恶化:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2015 Mar 2;8:137-45. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S78008. eCollection 2015.
10
Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.危重症患者强化血糖控制与常规血糖控制的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810625. Epub 2009 Mar 24.