• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safely Converting an Entire Academic Medical Center From Sliding Scale to Basal Bolus Insulin via Implementation of the eGlycemic Management System.通过实施电子血糖管理系统,安全地将整个学术医疗中心从滑动比例胰岛素治疗转换为基础-餐时胰岛素治疗。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):53-59. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747619. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
Comparison of an Electronic Glycemic Management System Versus Provider-Managed Subcutaneous Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy in the Hospital Setting.医院环境中电子血糖管理系统与医护人员管理的皮下基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):12-16. doi: 10.1177/1932296816664746. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
3
Efficacy of basal-bolus insulin regimens in the inpatient management of non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基础-餐时胰岛素方案在非危重症2型糖尿病患者住院治疗中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017 Jul;33(5). doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2885. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
4
Risk of Hypoglycemia During Insulin Infusion Directed by Paper Protocol Versus Electronic Glycemic Management System in Critically Ill Patients at a Large Academic Medical Center.在一家大型学术医疗中心,针对重症患者,纸质方案指导的胰岛素输注与电子血糖管理系统指导的胰岛素输注过程中发生低血糖的风险。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747617. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
5
USE OF A COMPUTER-GUIDED GLUCOSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO IMPROVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND ADDRESS NATIONAL QUALITY MEASURES: A 7-YEAR, RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AT A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL.使用计算机引导的血糖管理系统改善血糖控制并满足国家质量指标:在一家三级护理教学医院进行的为期7年的回顾性观察研究。
Endocr Pract. 2017 Mar;23(3):331-341. doi: 10.4158/EP161402.OR. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
6
Basal-bolus insulin versus sliding-scale insulin for inpatient glycaemic control: a clinical practice comparison.基础-餐时胰岛素与胰岛素调整剂量方案用于住院患者血糖控制的比较:一项临床实践比较。
Med J Aust. 2012 Mar 5;196(4):266-9. doi: 10.5694/mja11.10853.
7
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of an eGlycemic Management System in a Community Hospital Setting.评价一种电子血糖管理系统在社区医院环境中的疗效和安全性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):236-241. doi: 10.1177/1932296820980026. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Intensive insulin protocol implementation and outcomes in the medical and surgical wards at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.在退伍军人事务医疗中心的内科和外科病房实施强化胰岛素方案的结果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;44(2):249-56. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M501. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
9
Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes (RABBIT 2 trial).基础-餐时胰岛素治疗在2型糖尿病患者住院管理中的随机研究(RABBIT 2试验)
Diabetes Care. 2007 Sep;30(9):2181-6. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0295. Epub 2007 May 18.
10
Management of hyperglycemia in diabetic patients with hematologic malignancies during dexamethasone therapy.地塞米松治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的高血糖管理。
Endocr Pract. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):231-5. doi: 10.4158/EP12256.OR.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Initial eGlycemic Management System Dosing Strategy on Time to Target Blood Glucose Range.初始血糖管理系统给药策略对达标血糖范围时间的影响。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):242-250. doi: 10.1177/1932296821992352. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Inpatient and Outpatient Technologies to Assist in the Management of Insulin Dosing.用于辅助胰岛素剂量管理的住院和门诊技术。
Clin Diabetes. 2020 Dec;38(5):462-473. doi: 10.2337/cd20-0054.
3
Evaluating the effectiveness of a multi-faceted inpatient diabetes management program among hospitalised patients with diabetes mellitus.评估多方面住院糖尿病管理项目对住院糖尿病患者的有效性。
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Nov 5;6(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40842-020-00107-2.
4
Inpatient Hypoglycemia: The Challenge Remains.住院患者低血糖:挑战依然存在。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 May;14(3):560-566. doi: 10.1177/1932296820918540.
5
Subcutaneous Insulin Dosing Calculators for Inpatient Glucose Control.皮下胰岛素给药计算器在住院血糖控制中的应用。
Curr Diab Rep. 2019 Nov 4;19(11):120. doi: 10.1007/s11892-019-1254-y.
6
Future technology-enabled care for diabetes and hyperglycemia in the hospital setting.医院环境中未来通过技术实现的糖尿病和高血糖护理。
World J Diabetes. 2019 Sep 15;10(9):473-480. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i9.473.
7
Evaluation of Several Electronic Glycemic Management Systems.几种电子血糖管理系统的评估
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):60-62. doi: 10.1177/1932296817751748.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Inpatient Cost Per Day in General Surgery Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Basal-Bolus versus Sliding Scale Insulin Regimens.基础-餐时胰岛素方案与滑动血糖胰岛素方案治疗的2型糖尿病普通外科患者每日住院费用比较
Pharmacoecon Open. 2017;1(2):109-115. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0020-9. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
2
Comparison of an Electronic Glycemic Management System Versus Provider-Managed Subcutaneous Basal Bolus Insulin Therapy in the Hospital Setting.医院环境中电子血糖管理系统与医护人员管理的皮下基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的比较。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):12-16. doi: 10.1177/1932296816664746. Epub 2016 Sep 25.
3
Effective adverse event reduction with bolus-basal versus sliding scale insulin therapy in patients with diabetes during conventional hospitalization: Systematic review and meta-analysis.常规住院期间,与胰岛素滑动剂量方案相比,基础-餐时胰岛素方案能有效减少糖尿病患者的不良事件:系统评价与荟萃分析
Endocrinol Nutr. 2016 Apr;63(4):145-56. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2015.11.008. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
4
Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Versus Conservative Glucose Control in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: GLUCO-CABG Trial.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者强化与保守血糖控制的随机对照试验:GLUCO-CABG试验
Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):1665-72. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0303. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
5
Sliding-scale insulin used for blood glucose control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.用于血糖控制的胰岛素滑动剂量方案:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Metabolism. 2015 Sep;64(9):1183-92. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 21.
6
Improvement in inpatient glycemic care: pathways to quality.住院患者血糖管理的改善:通往质量之路。
Curr Diab Rep. 2015 Apr;15(4):18. doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0587-4.
7
Tides of change: improving glucometrics in a large multihospital health care system.变革浪潮:改善大型多医院医疗系统中的血糖指标测定
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 May;9(3):602-8. doi: 10.1177/1932296814563953. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
8
Inpatient management of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Does choice of insulin regimen really matter?2 型糖尿病患者的住院管理:胰岛素方案的选择真的重要吗?
Pak J Med Sci. 2014 Jul;30(4):895-8.
9
Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients in non-critical care setting: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.非重症监护环境住院患者高血糖管理:内分泌学会临床实践指南。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):16-38. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2098.
10
Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing general surgery (RABBIT 2 surgery).随机研究基础-餐时胰岛素治疗在 2 型糖尿病患者普通外科手术(RABBIT 2 手术)中的住院管理。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):256-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1407. Epub 2011 Jan 12.

通过实施电子血糖管理系统,安全地将整个学术医疗中心从滑动比例胰岛素治疗转换为基础-餐时胰岛素治疗。

Safely Converting an Entire Academic Medical Center From Sliding Scale to Basal Bolus Insulin via Implementation of the eGlycemic Management System.

作者信息

Newsom Rosalina, Patty Christopher, Camarena Emma, Sawyer Regina, McFarland Raymie, Gray Thomas, Mabrey Melanie

机构信息

1 Kaweah Delta Health Care District, Visalia, CA, USA.

2 Department of Quality Initiatives & Clinical Excellence, Glytec, Waltham, MA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):53-59. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747619. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1177/1932296817747619
PMID:29237289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5761993/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hyperglycemia is common in the inpatient setting and providers frequently rely on sliding scale insulin. This case study reviews the experience of one hospital moving from high utilization of sliding scale to basal bolus insulin therapy.

METHOD

This Retrospective Quality Improvement Study describes the journey of clinicians at a 580-bed hospital to convert from high usage of SSI to BBI. Hyperglycemic adult patients prescribed insulin, with/without a diagnosis of diabetes, were included.

RESULTS

Data over the first year showed that patients treated with Glucommander (GM) spent more time in the target range of 70-180 mg/dL than patients treated with non-Glucommander (non-GM), with 2,434 fewer hypoglycemic events and 40,589 fewer hyperglycemic events. Prior to implementation of GM, SSI was close to 95%, BBI at 5%. Within the first month of use, 96% usage of BBI was achieved. Reduction of hypoglycemic events (% of BG < 70 mg/dL) by 21% with 2.16% non-GM compared to GM at 1.74% and severe Hypoglycemia (% of BG < 50 mg/dL) by 50% in the ICU 3% non-GM compared to GM at 1.5%. In addition, patients treated with GM had a shorter LOS than patients treated with non-GM by 3.18 days and used 47.4% less point of care tests per patient.

CONCLUSION

Glycemic management improved with use of eGMS. The conversion from SSI to BBI enhanced overall patient safety, eliminated the time and effort otherwise required when manually titrating insulin and reduced overall cost of care for patients on insulin therapy.

摘要

目的

高血糖在住院患者中很常见,医疗服务提供者经常依赖胰岛素滑动剂量表。本案例研究回顾了一家医院从高频率使用胰岛素滑动剂量表转向基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的经历。

方法

这项回顾性质量改进研究描述了一家拥有580张床位的医院的临床医生从高频率使用胰岛素滑动剂量表(SSI)转换为基础-餐时胰岛素治疗(BBI)的过程。纳入了开具胰岛素处方的成年高血糖患者,无论其是否被诊断为糖尿病。

结果

第一年的数据显示,使用Glucommander(GM)治疗的患者在70-180mg/dL的目标范围内停留的时间比使用非Glucommander(非GM)治疗的患者更长,低血糖事件减少了2434起,高血糖事件减少了40589起。在实施GM之前,SSI的使用率接近95%,BBI为5%。在使用的第一个月内,BBI的使用率达到了96%。与GM组1.74%相比,非GM组低血糖事件(血糖<70mg/dL的百分比)降低了21%,为2.16%;在重症监护病房,与GM组1.5%相比,非GM组严重低血糖事件(血糖<50mg/dL的百分比)降低了50%,为3%。此外,与非GM组患者相比,使用GM治疗的患者住院时间缩短了3.18天,每位患者的即时检验使用量减少了47.4%。

结论

使用电子血糖管理系统(eGMS)改善了血糖管理。从SSI转换为BBI提高了整体患者安全性,消除了手动调整胰岛素时所需的时间和精力,并降低了胰岛素治疗患者的总体护理成本。