Suppr超能文献

在姑息治疗背景下验证的谵妄筛查工具:系统评价。

Delirium screening tools validated in the context of palliative care: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;35(4):683-696. doi: 10.1177/0269216321994730. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is a distressing neuropsychiatric disorder affecting patients in palliative care. Although many delirium screening tools exist, their utility, and validation within palliative care settings has not undergone systematic review.

AIM

To systematically review studies that validate delirium screening tools conducted in palliative care settings.

DESIGN

Systematic review with narrative synthesis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42019125481). A risk of bias assessment via Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was performed.

DATA SOURCES

Five electronic databases were systematically searched (January 1, 1982-May 3, 2020). Quantitative studies validating a screening tool in adult palliative care patient populations were included. Studies involving alcohol withdrawal, critical or perioperative care were excluded.

RESULTS

Dual-reviewer screening of 3749 unique titles and abstracts identified 95 studies for full-text review and of these, 17 studies of 14 screening tools were included ( = 3496 patients). Data analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity in patient demographics and variability in screening and diagnostic practices that limited generalizability between study populations and care settings. A risk of bias assessment revealed methodological and reporting deficits, with only 3/17 studies at low risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The processes of selecting a delirium screening tool and determining optimal screening practices in palliative care are complex. One tool is unlikely to fit the needs of the entire palliative care population across all palliative care settings. Further research should be directed at evaluating and/or adapting screening tools and practices to fit the needs of specific palliative care settings and populations.

摘要

背景

谵妄是一种令人痛苦的神经精神疾病,影响姑息治疗中的患者。尽管有许多谵妄筛查工具,但它们在姑息治疗环境中的效用和验证尚未经过系统评价。

目的

系统评价姑息治疗环境中进行的谵妄筛查工具的验证研究。

设计

系统评价与叙述性综合(PROSPERO ID:CRD42019125481)。通过诊断准确性研究质量评估工具-2 进行偏倚风险评估。

数据来源

系统搜索了五个电子数据库(1982 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 3 日)。纳入了验证成人姑息治疗患者群体中筛查工具的定量研究。排除了涉及酒精戒断、重症监护或围手术期护理的研究。

结果

对 3749 篇独特标题和摘要进行了双 reviewer 筛选,确定了 95 篇全文审查的研究,其中包括 17 项研究的 14 种筛查工具( = 3496 名患者)。数据分析显示,患者人口统计学特征存在很大差异,筛查和诊断实践存在差异,这限制了研究人群和护理环境之间的可推广性。偏倚风险评估显示存在方法学和报告缺陷,只有 3/17 项研究的偏倚风险较低。

结论

在姑息治疗中选择谵妄筛查工具和确定最佳筛查实践的过程非常复杂。一种工具不太可能适合所有姑息治疗环境中的整个姑息治疗人群的需求。进一步的研究应致力于评估和/或调整筛查工具和实践,以适应特定姑息治疗环境和人群的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验