Suppr超能文献

在接受专科姑息治疗的成年患者中,医疗保健专业人员对谵妄进行筛查、识别和管理的障碍:一项混合方法的系统评价。

Barriers to healthcare professionals screening, recognizing, and managing delirium in the adult patients receiving specialist palliative care: a mixed-methods systematic review.

作者信息

Qian Fang, Yao Danyang, Shi Huanhuan, Tung Tao-Hsin, Bi Dongjun

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325035, China.

Cixi Biomedical Research Institute, Wenzhou Medical University, Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315302, China.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 29;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01634-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium frequently occurs in palliative care settings, yet its screening, identification, and management remain suboptimal in clinical practice. This review aims to elucidate the barriers preventing healthcare professionals from effectively screening, recognizing, and managing delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care, with the goal of developing strategies to enhance clinical practice.

METHODS

A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted (PROSPERO: CRD42024563666). Literature was sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials databases from their inception to November 16, 2024, without language restrictions. Studies that were primary quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research, and reported the barriers to healthcare professionals' screening, recognition, and management of delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care (including inpatient hospice/hospital care, consultation teams, and outpatient/community services) were included. Studies were excluded if they did not permit barrier factor extraction, had duplicate or incomplete data, or were case reports or conference abstracts. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 was employed to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. Data synthesis used the convergent-integrated JBI mixed-methods approach.

RESULTS

21 articles that meet the selection criteria have been identified, with 11 quantitative, 8 qualitative and 2 mixed-methods, collectively involving 857 patients and 649 healthcare professionals. Four themes were identified from the includes studies: (1) Individual level: knowledge and understanding gaps among healthcare professionals; (2) Operational level: implementation challenges in clinical practice; (3) Organizational level: structural and resource deficiencies; (4) Contextual level: specific impacts of situational factors.

CONCLUSION

The systematic review uncovered a complex interplay of barriers spanning individual, operational, organizational, and contextual levels in palliative settings. To address these challenges, recommended strategies include developing targeted training programs, implementing standardized delirium assessment tools, improving guideline accessibility, and promoting interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance delirium screening and management in palliative care.

摘要

背景

谵妄在姑息治疗环境中经常发生,但在临床实践中,其筛查、识别和管理仍未达到最佳水平。本综述旨在阐明阻碍医护人员对接受专科姑息治疗的成年患者有效筛查、识别和管理谵妄的障碍,以期制定提高临床实践水平的策略。

方法

进行了一项混合方法的系统综述(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库:CRD42024563666)。文献来源于PubMed、科学网、Embase、护理学与健康领域数据库、考克兰图书馆和临床试验数据库,时间跨度从各数据库建库至2024年11月16日,无语言限制。纳入的研究包括原发性定量研究、定性研究和混合方法研究,且报告了医护人员对接受专科姑息治疗的成年患者(包括住院临终关怀/医院护理、会诊团队以及门诊/社区服务)进行谵妄筛查、识别和管理的障碍。若研究不允许提取障碍因素、数据重复或不完整,或为病例报告或会议摘要,则予以排除。采用2018版混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估纳入研究的方法学质量。数据综合采用整合性JBI混合方法。

结果

已识别出21篇符合入选标准的文章,其中11篇为定量研究,8篇为定性研究,2篇为混合方法研究,共涉及857例患者和649名医护人员。从纳入研究中确定了四个主题:(1)个人层面:医护人员的知识和理解差距;(2)操作层面:临床实践中的实施挑战;(3)组织层面:结构和资源不足;(4)情境层面:情境因素的具体影响。

结论

该系统综述揭示了姑息治疗环境中个人、操作、组织和情境层面障碍之间复杂的相互作用。为应对这些挑战,推荐的策略包括制定针对性培训计划、实施标准化谵妄评估工具、提高指南的可及性,以及促进跨学科合作,以加强姑息治疗中谵妄的筛查和管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d737/11776129/4253b4f0e1a5/12904_2024_1634_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验