Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA.
STATinMED Research, Plano, TX, USA.
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):352-362. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1890428.
To compare healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and treatment adherence and persistence for patients with bipolar disorder treated with lurasidone or cariprazine.
Adult patients with bipolar disorder who initiated lurasidone or cariprazine as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2019 were identified from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Database. The date of the first claim for lurasidone or cariprazine was defined as the index date. A difference-in-difference (DID) analysis, which mitigated bias by using each cohort as its own control, compared the changes in HCRU and costs from 6-months pre-treatment (baseline) to 6-months post-treatment (follow-up) between the two cohorts. Treatment adherence (medication possession ratio and proportion of days covered) and persistence (time to discontinuation) were assessed during the 6-month post-treatment period. Adjusted analyses were conducted using inverse probability of treatment weighting on HCRU, costs, and time to discontinuation.
A total of 16,683 patients treated with lurasidone and 4,128 patients treated with cariprazine were identified. Average age (39-40) and proportion female (68-71%) were similar between cohorts. Both cohorts had reductions in hospitalizations from baseline to follow-up, and the decrease was significantly greater for the lurasidone cohort compared to the cariprazine cohort (change in the proportions of patients with all-cause hospitalizations: -5.3% vs. -2.5%, DID = -2.8%, <.001). The total healthcare costs increased from baseline to follow-up in both cohorts, and the increase was significantly lower for the lurasidone cohort (change in total all-cause healthcare cost per person: $3,413 vs. $4,642, DID=-$1,228, = .022). The lurasidone cohort had significantly lower risk of discontinuing treatment (hazard ratio = 0.86, <.001) than the cariprazine cohort.
Patients with bipolar disorder treated with lurasidone had greater reductions in hospitalizations from 6-months pre-treatment to 6-months post-treatment and had a lower increase in total costs compared to patients treated with cariprazine.
比较双相情感障碍患者接受鲁拉西酮或卡利拉嗪治疗的医疗资源利用(HCRU)、成本、治疗依从性和持久性。
从 IBM MarketScan 商业和医疗保险补充数据库中确定了 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间开始接受鲁拉西酮或卡利拉嗪单药或联合治疗的成年双相情感障碍患者。首次使用鲁拉西酮或卡利拉嗪的日期定义为索引日期。采用差异(DID)分析,通过将每个队列作为自身对照来减轻偏差,比较两个队列从治疗前 6 个月(基线)到治疗后 6 个月(随访)期间 HCRU 和成本的变化。在治疗后 6 个月期间评估治疗依从性(药物持有率和覆盖天数比例)和持久性(停药时间)。使用倾向评分逆概率加权法对 HCRU、成本和停药时间进行调整分析。
共纳入 16683 例接受鲁拉西酮治疗和 4128 例接受卡利拉嗪治疗的患者。两个队列的平均年龄(39-40 岁)和女性比例(68-71%)相似。两个队列的住院人数均从基线下降到随访,鲁拉西酮队列的下降幅度明显大于卡利拉嗪队列(所有原因住院患者比例的变化:-5.3% vs. -2.5%,DID=-2.8%,<.001)。两个队列的总医疗保健成本均从基线增加到随访,鲁拉西酮队列的增加幅度明显较低(人均总全因医疗保健成本的变化:$3413 美元 vs. $4642 美元,DID=-$1228,<.001)。与卡利拉嗪队列相比,接受鲁拉西酮治疗的患者停止治疗的风险显著降低(风险比=0.86,<.001)。
与接受卡利拉嗪治疗的患者相比,接受鲁拉西酮治疗的双相情感障碍患者从治疗前 6 个月到治疗后 6 个月的住院人数减少幅度更大,总费用增加幅度更低。