• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社区的综合方法干预儿童哮喘:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Community-based interventions for childhood asthma using comprehensive approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chan Mei, Gray Melinda, Burns Christine, Owens Louisa, Woolfenden Susan, Lingam Raghu, Jaffe Adam, Homaira Nusrat

机构信息

Discipline of Paediatrics, School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.

Respiratory Department, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb 15;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13223-021-00522-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13223-021-00522-9
PMID:33588934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7885565/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of comprehensive community-based interventions with ≥ 2 components in improving asthma outcomes in children.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Cochrane Library and hand search of reference collections were conducted to identify any research articles published in English between 2000 and 2019. All studies reporting community-based asthma interventions with ≥ 2 components (e.g., asthma self-management education, home environmental assessment or care coordination etc.) for children aged ≤ 18 years were included. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects model to estimate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of the 2352 studies identified, 21 studies were included in the final analysis: 19 pre-post interventions, one randomised controlled trial (RCT) and one retrospective study. Comprehensive asthma programs with multicomponent interventions were associated with significant reduction in asthma-related Emergency Department (ED) visits (OR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.20-0.35), hospitalizations (OR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.15-0.38), number of days (mean difference = - 2.58; 95% CI - 3.00 to - 2.17) and nights with asthma symptoms (mean difference = - 2.14; 95% CI - 2.94 to - 1.34), use of short-acting asthma medications/bronchodilators (BD) (OR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.16-0.51), and increase use of asthma action plan (AAP) (OR = 8.87; 95% CI 3.85-20.45).

CONCLUSION

Community-based asthma care using more comprehensive approaches may improve childhood asthma management and reduce asthma related health care utilization.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定包含≥2个组成部分的综合性社区干预措施在改善儿童哮喘结局方面的有效性。

方法

对医学文献数据库(Medline)、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、考克兰图书馆进行系统检索,并手动检索参考文献集,以识别2000年至2019年间发表的英文研究文章。纳入所有报告针对≤18岁儿童的包含≥2个组成部分(如哮喘自我管理教育、家庭环境评估或护理协调等)的社区哮喘干预措施的研究。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以估计合并比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在识别出的2352项研究中,21项研究纳入最终分析:19项前后对照干预研究、1项随机对照试验(RCT)和1项回顾性研究。采用多组分干预措施的综合性哮喘项目与哮喘相关急诊就诊次数显著减少(OR = 0.26;95%CI 0.20 - 0.35)、住院次数(OR = 0.24;95%CI 0.15 - 0.38)、哮喘症状天数(平均差值 = -2.58;95%CI -3.00至 -2.17)和哮喘症状夜晚数(平均差值 = -2.14;95%CI -2.94至 -1.34)、短效哮喘药物/支气管扩张剂(BD)使用量(OR = 0.28;95%CI 0.16 - 0.51)减少以及哮喘行动计划(AAP)使用量增加(OR = 8.87;95%CI 3.85 - 20.45)相关。

结论

采用更综合方法的社区哮喘护理可能改善儿童哮喘管理并减少与哮喘相关的医疗保健利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/929b98fe2002/13223_2021_522_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/f080e2b7eb09/13223_2021_522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/00aa3e92367f/13223_2021_522_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/4d69fc9c9bf6/13223_2021_522_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/744c793b22ec/13223_2021_522_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/1b7d6b4c0550/13223_2021_522_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/34343240a467/13223_2021_522_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/13b96d971da5/13223_2021_522_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/929b98fe2002/13223_2021_522_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/f080e2b7eb09/13223_2021_522_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/00aa3e92367f/13223_2021_522_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/4d69fc9c9bf6/13223_2021_522_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/744c793b22ec/13223_2021_522_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/1b7d6b4c0550/13223_2021_522_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/34343240a467/13223_2021_522_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/13b96d971da5/13223_2021_522_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e003/7885565/929b98fe2002/13223_2021_522_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Community-based interventions for childhood asthma using comprehensive approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于社区的综合方法干预儿童哮喘:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb 15;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13223-021-00522-9.
2
Effectiveness of nursing interventions for management of children with bronchial asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.护理干预对支气管哮喘患儿管理的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2023 Dec;29(6):e13139. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13139. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
4
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.干预措施对帮助照顾者支持社区中痴呆症患者的有效性:系统评价。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Jun;6(2):137-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2008.00090.x.
5
Social Risk Interventions and Health Care Utilization for Pediatric Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.社会风险干预对儿童哮喘的医疗利用影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Feb 1;176(2):e215103. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5103. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
6
Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.协助照料者支持社区痴呆症患者的干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2008;6(13):484-544. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200806130-00001.
7
8
Effectiveness of Community-Based Nursing Intervention for Asthmatic Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于社区的哮喘儿童护理干预的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Oct;52(10):2025-2035. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i10.13840.
9
10
Community Interventions for Childhood Asthma ED Visits and Hospitalizations: A Systematic Review.社区干预措施对儿童哮喘急诊就诊和住院的影响:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2022 Oct 1;150(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-054825.

引用本文的文献

1
The Economic Impact of Community-Based Allied Health on the Acute Sector: A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations.基于社区的联合健康对急性病医疗部门的经济影响:经济评估的系统评价
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 7;18:4763-4793. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S539173. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of Artificial Intelligence Health Education Accurately Linking System on childhood asthma: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.人工智能健康教育精准链接系统对儿童哮喘的影响:一项试点随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 6;16:1585702. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1585702. eCollection 2025.
3
Home-based educational interventions for children with asthma.

本文引用的文献

1
School-based asthma self-management interventions for children and adolescents with asthma.针对患有哮喘的儿童和青少年的校本哮喘自我管理干预措施。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2019 Aug;31:40-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
2
Comprehensive Community-Based Intervention and Asthma Outcomes in African American Adolescents.针对非裔美国青少年的基于社区的综合干预与哮喘结局
Pediatrics. 2018 Oct;142(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3737. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
3
Cost-effectiveness of an Evidence-Based Childhood Asthma Intervention in Real-World Primary Care Settings.
针对哮喘儿童的家庭式教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;2(2):CD008469. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008469.pub3.
4
Effectiveness of pediatric asthma education program in the context of a general hospital in France: A retrospective real-life study.法国一家综合医院背景下的儿童哮喘教育项目效果:一项回顾性真实世界研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 26;10(15):e35356. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35356. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
5
Social deprivation and spatial clustering of childhood asthma in Australia.社会剥夺与澳大利亚儿童哮喘的空间集聚
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Jun 24;9(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00361-2.
6
Asthma Care from Home: Study protocol for an effectiveness-implementation evaluation of a virtually enabled asthma care initiative in children in rural NSW.居家哮喘护理:新南威尔士州农村地区儿童虚拟哮喘护理计划有效性-实施评估的研究方案
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0304711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304711. eCollection 2024.
7
Effectiveness of Asthma Home Management Manual and Low-Cost Air Filter on Quality of Life Among Asthma Adults: A 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.哮喘家庭管理手册和低成本空气过滤器对成年哮喘患者生活质量的影响:一项三臂随机对照试验。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 May 24;17:2613-2622. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S397388. eCollection 2024.
8
Building a regional pediatric asthma learning health system in support of optimal, equitable outcomes.建立一个区域性儿科哮喘学习型健康系统,以支持实现最佳、公平的治疗效果。
Learn Health Syst. 2023 Dec 11;8(2):e10403. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10403. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
Effectiveness of Community-Based Nursing Intervention for Asthmatic Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于社区的哮喘儿童护理干预的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Oct;52(10):2025-2035. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i10.13840.
10
Utilization of electronic portal referrals to a community agency for children presenting with an asthma exacerbation to a pediatric emergency department.利用电子门到社区机构的转诊,为因哮喘加重而到儿科急诊就诊的儿童提供服务。
J Asthma. 2024 Apr;61(4):307-312. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2272796. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
基于证据的儿童哮喘干预措施在现实世界基层医疗环境中的成本效益
J Ambul Care Manage. 2018 Jul/Sep;41(3):213-224. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000231.
4
Improving Asthma-Related Outcomes Among Children Participating in the Head-Off Environmental Asthma in Louisiana (HEAL), Phase II Study.改善参与路易斯安那州预防环境性哮喘(HEAL)二期研究的儿童的哮喘相关结局。
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Mar;19(2):233-239. doi: 10.1177/1524839917740126. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
5
Association of an Asthma Improvement Collaborative With Health Care Utilization in Medicaid-Insured Pediatric Patients in an Urban Community.城市社区中医疗补助保险的儿科患者哮喘改善协作组织与医疗保健利用的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Nov 1;171(11):1072-1080. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2600.
6
Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Asthma Interventions.基于证据的哮喘干预措施的有效性
Pediatrics. 2017 Jun;139(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4221. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Coordinated Asthma Program Improves Asthma Outcomes in High-Risk Children.协作哮喘项目改善高危儿童的哮喘治疗效果。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Sep;56(10):934-941. doi: 10.1177/0009922817705186. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
9
Pediatric Asthma Care Coordination in Underserved Communities: A Quasiexperimental Study.服务不足社区的儿童哮喘护理协调:一项准实验研究。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):2012-2018. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303373. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
10
Cost-effectiveness of telehealth for patients with raised cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from the Healthlines randomised controlled trial.远程医疗对心血管疾病风险升高患者的成本效益:来自健康热线随机对照试验的证据。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 26;6(8):e012352. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012352.