Theoretical Ecology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Feb;36(2):151-163. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
Half a century ago, Janzen and Connell hypothesized that the high tree species diversity in tropical forests is maintained by specialized natural enemies. Along with other mechanisms, these can cause conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD) and thus maintain species diversity. Numerous studies have measured proxies of CNDD worldwide, but doubt about its relative importance remains. We find ample evidence for CNDD in local populations, but methodological limitations make it difficult to assess if CNDD scales up to control community diversity and thereby local and global biodiversity patterns. A combination of more robust statistical methods, new study designs, and eco-evolutionary models are needed to provide a more definite evaluation of the importance of CNDD for geographic variation in plant species diversity.
半个世纪前,简森和康奈尔假设热带森林中高的树种多样性是由专门的天敌维持的。与其他机制一起,这些机制可以导致同种的负密度依赖性(CNDD),从而维持物种多样性。许多研究已经在全球范围内测量了 CNDD 的指标,但对其相对重要性仍存在怀疑。我们在当地种群中发现了充足的 CNDD 证据,但方法上的局限性使得很难评估 CNDD 是否可以扩展到控制群落多样性,从而控制当地和全球生物多样性模式。需要结合更强大的统计方法、新的研究设计和生态进化模型,以更明确地评估 CNDD 对植物物种多样性地理变异的重要性。