University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jun;92:103161. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103161. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
Doping in sport is a significant issue. To date, research informing doping prevention has lacked a framework guiding research priorities. To ensure research is coordinated, sustainable and focused on end-user priorities, this study co-created the first research agenda for doping prevention.
The Delphi method was used to develop this agenda. Based upon two substantive reviews of the doping literature and 12 focus groups across five countries, a questionnaire was developed assessing the importance of 15 research topics and identifying research questions. Eighty-two anti-doping stakeholders with relevant expertise were invited to be panel members. In Round 1, an expert panel (n = 57; 70% response rate) completed this questionnaire. In Round 2, panel members (n = 33; 58% response rate) ranked for relative importance the eight topic areas rated highest in Round 1, before doing the same for research questions within each topic. Based on these rankings, a draft agenda was created. In Round 3, panel members (n = 26; 79% response rate) rated the degree to which they accepted this agenda, the feasibility of its delivery and identified possible barriers and facilitators to implementation.
The results of Round 1 and Round 2 were used to create a draft agenda consisting of 18 research questions stratified across eight topic areas. This agenda was either fully (n = 16) or mostly (n = 9) accepted by the panel in Round 3 (96.2%). Research topics included the effectiveness of interventions/education programmes, environmental influences, long-term development of protective and risk factors in athletes and their entourage, athletes' experiences of anti-doping procedures and athletes' place in the anti-doping system.
A rigorous exercise created an agenda for doping prevention research. Adoption and application of this agenda should lead to better coordination, more efficient use of funding, enhanced uptake of research findings and more effective doping prevention education.
运动中的兴奋剂问题是一个重大问题。迄今为止,为预防兴奋剂而开展的研究缺乏指导研究重点的框架。为确保研究协调一致、可持续并关注最终用户的优先事项,本研究共同制定了预防兴奋剂的首个研究议程。
采用德尔菲法制定该议程。在对兴奋剂文献进行了两次实质性审查和在五个国家进行了 12 个焦点小组讨论的基础上,制定了一份调查问卷,评估了 15 个研究课题的重要性,并确定了研究问题。邀请了 82 名具有相关专业知识的反兴奋剂利益相关者作为小组成员。在第一轮中,一个专家小组(n=57;响应率为 70%)完成了该问卷。在第二轮中,小组成员(n=33;响应率为 58%)对第一轮中得分最高的 8 个主题领域的相对重要性进行了排名,然后对每个主题内的研究问题进行了同样的排名。根据这些排名,创建了一份草稿议程。在第三轮中,小组成员(n=26;响应率为 79%)对他们接受该议程的程度、其实施的可行性以及确定实施的可能障碍和促进因素进行了评分。
第一轮和第二轮的结果被用于创建一个包含 18 个研究问题的草稿议程,这些问题分为 8 个主题领域。在第三轮中,该议程得到了小组成员的完全(n=16)或大部分(n=9)接受(96.2%)。研究课题包括干预/教育计划的效果、环境影响、运动员及其随行人员的保护和风险因素的长期发展、运动员对反兴奋剂程序的体验以及运动员在反兴奋剂系统中的地位。
一项严格的研究制定了预防兴奋剂研究的议程。该议程的采用和应用应能更好地协调、更有效地利用资金、更有效地采用研究成果和开展更有效的兴奋剂预防教育。