• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持医生提供泌乳护理的干预措施:一项系统评价与叙述性分析

Interventions supporting medical practitioners in the provision of lactation care: A systematic review and narrative analysis.

作者信息

Boss Melinda, Saxby Nicole, Pritchard Douglas, Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Clifford Rhonda

机构信息

School of Allied Health, Division of Pharmacy, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.

Women's and Children's Services, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Jul;17(3):e13160. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13160. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1111/mcn.13160
PMID:33590635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8189190/
Abstract

Most children globally are not breastfed to recommendations. Medical practitioners are frequently visited in the first 6 months post-partum, and the interaction at such visits significantly influences subsequent infant feeding decisions. Medical practitioners report that clinical practice in lactation is often disproportionately reliant on personal experience. This systematic review synthesises the literature on lactation health interventions used to support clinical decision making by medical practitioners. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were searched for peer-reviewed empirical studies published after 2000. Two reviewers independently screened and then assessed full-text articles against inclusion criteria. Quality of reporting and risk of bias were independently assessed using three validated tools. No conclusions can be made regarding the success or failure of implementation strategies used or the outcomes of putting them into effect due to problems with study methodology, intervention reporting and risk of bias. Good-quality research, which follows proven implementation frameworks, is needed to guide and sustain the incorporation of evidence-based decision support into medical practitioners' care of breastfeeding mothers and infants.

摘要

全球大多数儿童未按照建议进行母乳喂养。产后头6个月,产妇频繁就医,而此类就诊时的互动会显著影响后续的婴儿喂养决策。医生报告称,哺乳期的临床实践往往过度依赖个人经验。本系统评价综合了有关用于支持医生临床决策的哺乳期健康干预措施的文献。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆数据库,查找2000年后发表的同行评审实证研究。两名评审员独立筛选,然后根据纳入标准评估全文文章。使用三种经过验证的工具独立评估报告质量和偏倚风险。由于研究方法、干预措施报告和偏倚风险方面的问题,无法就所采用的实施策略的成败或实施结果得出结论。需要开展遵循成熟实施框架的高质量研究,以指导并持续将循证决策支持纳入医生对母乳喂养母婴的护理工作中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc3/8189190/f172746de402/MCN-17-e13160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc3/8189190/44763bcf29c2/MCN-17-e13160-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc3/8189190/f172746de402/MCN-17-e13160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc3/8189190/44763bcf29c2/MCN-17-e13160-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bc3/8189190/f172746de402/MCN-17-e13160-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Interventions supporting medical practitioners in the provision of lactation care: A systematic review and narrative analysis.支持医生提供泌乳护理的干预措施:一项系统评价与叙述性分析
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Jul;17(3):e13160. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13160. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.支持健康足月婴儿的母乳喂养母亲。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 25;10(10):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub6.
3
Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding.纯母乳喂养的最佳持续时间。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(1):CD003517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003517.
4
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
5
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
6
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination.针对向父母宣传或教育幼儿疫苗接种情况的面对面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 8;5(5):CD010038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010038.pub3.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Peer support interventions for parents and carers of children with complex needs.针对有复杂需求的儿童的父母和照顾者的同伴支持干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 20;12(12):CD010618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010618.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Breastfeeding related knowledge, attitudes, perceptions and practices of primary healthcare professionals in Ireland: A national cross-sectional survey.爱尔兰基层医疗保健专业人员与母乳喂养相关的知识、态度、认知和实践:一项全国性横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 9;20(4):e0320763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320763. eCollection 2025.
2
Re-thinking benign inflammation of the lactating breast: Classification, prevention, and management.重新思考哺乳期乳房良性炎症:分类、预防和管理。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221091349. doi: 10.1177/17455057221091349.
3
Re-thinking lactation-related nipple pain and damage.

本文引用的文献

1
A qualitative examination of barriers against effective medical education and practices related to breastfeeding promotion and support in Lebanon.黎巴嫩促进和支持母乳喂养的医学教育和实践障碍的定性研究。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1723950. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1723950.
2
Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare.关于如何制定复杂干预措施以改善健康和医疗保健的指南。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e029954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954.
3
The cost of not breastfeeding: global results from a new tool.
重新思考与哺乳相关的乳头疼痛和损伤。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221087865. doi: 10.1177/17455057221087865.
4
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of nipple and breast candidiasis: A review of the relationship between diagnoses of mammary candidiasis and in breastfeeding women.乳头和乳房假丝酵母菌病的过度诊断和过度治疗:母乳喂养妇女的乳腺假丝酵母菌病与 之间关系的综述。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211031480. doi: 10.1177/17455065211031480.
不母乳喂养的代价:新工具的全球结果。
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Jul 1;34(6):407-417. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz050.
4
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: How we can make it work.21 世纪的母乳喂养:我们如何使其发挥作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;244:112331. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.036. Epub 2019 Jun 9.
5
Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review.循证干预可持续性策略:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0910-6.
6
Implementation Science in the Field of Nutrition: Why Is It So Relevant?营养领域的实施科学:为何如此重要?
Curr Dev Nutr. 2018 Oct 31;3(3):nzy086. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzy086. eCollection 2019 Mar.
7
A case study on breastfeeding education in Lebanon's public medical school: exploring the potential role of social networks in medical education.黎巴嫩公立医学院母乳喂养教育案例研究:探索社交网络在医学教育中的潜在作用。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1527629. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1527629.
8
Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).改进一种用于评估定性、定量和混合方法研究质量的工具——混合方法评估工具(MMAT)的实用性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):459-467. doi: 10.1111/jep.12884. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Development and Evaluation of a Lactation Rotation for a Pediatric Residency Program.儿科住院医师培训项目泌乳轮转的开发与评估
J Hum Lact. 2017 Nov;33(4):748-756. doi: 10.1177/0890334416679381. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.