Center for Health Policy Studies, School of Public Health and Department of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(2):e19651. doi: 10.2196/19651.
Violence against doctors in China is a serious problem that has attracted attention from both domestic and international media.
This study investigates readers' responses to media reports on violence against doctors to identify attitudes toward perpetrators and physicians and examine if such trends are influenced by national policies.
We searched 17 Chinese violence against doctors reports in international media sources from 2011 to 2020. We then tracked back the original reports and web crawled the 19,220 comments in China. To ascertain the possible turning point of public opinion, we searched violence against doctors-related policies from Tsinghua University ipolicy database from 2011 to 2020, and found 19 policies enacted by the Chinese central government aimed at alleviating the intense patient-physician relationship. We then conducted a series of interrupted time series analyses to examine the influence of these policies on public sentiment toward violence against doctors over time.
The interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) showed that the change in public sentiment toward violence against doctors reports was temporally associated with government interventions. The declarations of 10 of the public policies were followed by increases in the proportion of online public opinion in support of doctors (average slope changes of 0.010, P<.05). A decline in the proportion of online public opinion that blamed doctors (average level change of -0.784, P<.05) followed the declaration of 3 policies.
The government's administrative interventions effectively shaped public opinion but only temporarily. Continued public policy interventions are needed to sustain the reduction of hostility toward medical doctors.
中国的医生暴力事件是一个严重的问题,已经引起了国内外媒体的关注。
本研究调查了读者对媒体报道医生暴力事件的反应,以确定他们对犯罪者和医生的态度,并探讨这些趋势是否受到国家政策的影响。
我们从 2011 年至 2020 年在 17 家国际媒体来源中搜索了中国的 17 份医生暴力事件报告。然后,我们追溯原始报告,并在中国的 19220 条评论中进行了网络爬虫。为了确定公众意见的可能转折点,我们从清华大学 ipolicy 数据库中搜索了 2011 年至 2020 年与医生暴力相关的政策,并发现了 19 项中国中央政府旨在缓解紧张医患关系的政策。然后,我们进行了一系列中断时间序列分析,以检验这些政策随时间推移对公众对医生暴力态度的影响。
中断时间序列分析(ITSA)表明,公众对医生暴力事件报告的态度变化与政府干预具有时间相关性。10 项公共政策的宣布后,支持医生的在线公众意见比例增加(平均斜率变化为 0.010,P<.05)。在宣布 3 项政策后,指责医生的在线公众意见比例下降(平均水平变化为-0.784,P<.05)。
政府的行政干预有效地塑造了公众舆论,但只是暂时的。需要继续进行公共政策干预,以维持对医生敌意的减少。