文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者:新辅助放化疗+TME 与 TME+辅助化疗或单独 TME 的结局比较。

MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer patients: outcome comparison between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus TME and TME plus adjuvant chemotherapy or TME alone.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2021 Apr 1;94(1120):20201221. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201221. Epub 2021 Feb 16.


DOI:10.1259/bjr.20201221
PMID:33591799
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8010537/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) would improve the outcome of patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer compared with TME plus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) or TME alone. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 362 patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer who were treated with NCRT plus TME, TME plus ACT, or TME alone between January 2008 and August 2018. Cases with a high-risk tumor stage, positive extramural venous invasion, or mesorectal fascia involvement on baseline MRI were considered cases of high-risk rectal cancer. We matched patients treated with NCRT plus TME to patients treated with TME plus ACT and to those treated with TME alone. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates. RESULTS: The cumulative 3 year LR rate in the matched NCRT plus TME group was more favorable than in the TME plus ACT group (0% 5.1%; = 0.037; = 98) and in the TME alone group (0% 11.5%; = 0.016; = 61). Patients who received NCRT plus TME demonstrated better cumulative 3 year DFS rates than patients treated with TME plus ACT (85.7% 65.3%; = 0.009) or with TME alone (86.9% 68.9%; = 0.046). No difference in OS was observed among the groups. CONCLUSION: NCRT may improve DFS and LR rates in patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer when compared with TME plus ACT or TME alone. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study illustrated the specific benefit of NCRT on the outcome measures of MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer compared with TME plus ACT or TME alone, which was not clearly clarified in previous studies enrolling all patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer.

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨新辅助放化疗(NCRT)加全直肠系膜切除术(TME)是否比 TME 加辅助化疗(ACT)或单纯 TME 更能改善 MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者的预后。

方法:我们回顾性纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 8 月期间接受 NCRT 加 TME、TME 加 ACT 或单纯 TME 治疗的 362 例 MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者。基线 MRI 上具有高危肿瘤分期、阳性外膜静脉侵犯或直肠系膜筋膜受累的病例被认为是高危直肠癌病例。我们将接受 NCRT 加 TME 治疗的患者与接受 TME 加 ACT 治疗的患者和接受单纯 TME 治疗的患者进行匹配。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线比较局部复发(LR)、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)率。

结果:匹配的 NCRT 加 TME 组的累积 3 年 LR 率优于 TME 加 ACT 组(0% 5.1%; = 0.037; = 98)和 TME 单独组(0% 11.5%; = 0.016; = 61)。接受 NCRT 加 TME 治疗的患者的累积 3 年 DFS 率优于 TME 加 ACT 组(85.7% 65.3%; = 0.009)或 TME 单独组(86.9% 68.9%; = 0.046)。各组之间的 OS 无差异。

结论:与 TME 加 ACT 或 TME 单独治疗相比,NCRT 可能改善 MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者的 DFS 和 LR 率。

知识进展:本研究表明,与 TME 加 ACT 或 TME 单独治疗相比,NCRT 对 MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者的结局指标具有特定的益处,这在之前纳入所有 II/III 期直肠癌患者的研究中并未明确阐明。

相似文献

[1]
MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer patients: outcome comparison between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus TME and TME plus adjuvant chemotherapy or TME alone.

Br J Radiol. 2021-4-1

[2]
MRI-defined T3, clear mesorectal fascia mid-low rectal cancer: is neoadjuvant treatment necessary?

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-5

[3]
The influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with lateral lymph nodes dissection or not on the local recurrence of low to intermediate-stage II/III rectal cancer.

J Surg Oncol. 2024-2

[4]
Survival outcomes of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and MRI-detected extramural venous invasion.

Cancer Med. 2023-11

[5]
[Comparison of long-term efficacy between watch and wait strategy and total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020-3-25

[6]
Pretreatment MRI-detected extramural venous invasion as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in non-metastatic rectal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.

Eur Radiol. 2024-6

[7]
Oncological outcome after MRI-based selection for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the OCUM Rectal Cancer Trial.

Br J Surg. 2018-5-9

[8]
Improved Metastasis- and Disease-Free Survival With Preoperative Sequential Short-Course Radiation Therapy and FOLFOX Chemotherapy for Rectal Cancer Compared With Neoadjuvant Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy: Results of a Matched Pair Analysis.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017-10-1

[9]
Selective lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

World J Gastroenterol. 2020-6-7

[10]
Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for patients with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer? Long-term analysis of 40 ypCR patients at a single center.

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016-6

本文引用的文献

[1]
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might provide survival benefit in patients with stage IIIb/IIIc locally advanced rectal cancer: A retrospective single-institution study with propensity score-matched comparative analysis.

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020-6

[2]
Early MRI predictors of disease-free survival in locally advanced rectal cancer from the GRECCAR 4 trial.

Br J Surg. 2019-8-22

[3]
MRI-Based Use of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Carcinoma: Surgical Quality and Histopathological Outcome of the OCUM Trial.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019-8-14

[4]
Compliance to Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Patients Who Underwent Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Report from a Multi-institutional Research Network.

World J Surg. 2019-10

[5]
Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer with complete pathological response (pCR) may not be necessary: a pooled analysis of 5491 patients.

Cancer Cell Int. 2019-5-14

[6]
Pathological complete response may underestimate distant metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery: Incidence, metastatic pattern, and risk factors.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019-3-9

[7]
The Prognostic Value of a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Digestive Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 21 Studies.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2019-2-25

[8]
Total mesorectal excision with or without preoperative chemoradiotherapy for resectable mid/low rectal cancer: a long-term analysis of a prospective, single-center, randomized trial.

Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018-12-20

[9]
Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study.

Lancet. 2018-6-23

[10]
Low- Versus High-Risk Rectal Cancer Based on MRI Features: Outcomes in Patients Treated Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018-6-21

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索