Department of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Br J Radiol. 2021 Apr 1;94(1120):20201221. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201221. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) would improve the outcome of patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer compared with TME plus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) or TME alone. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 362 patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer who were treated with NCRT plus TME, TME plus ACT, or TME alone between January 2008 and August 2018. Cases with a high-risk tumor stage, positive extramural venous invasion, or mesorectal fascia involvement on baseline MRI were considered cases of high-risk rectal cancer. We matched patients treated with NCRT plus TME to patients treated with TME plus ACT and to those treated with TME alone. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates. RESULTS: The cumulative 3 year LR rate in the matched NCRT plus TME group was more favorable than in the TME plus ACT group (0% 5.1%; = 0.037; = 98) and in the TME alone group (0% 11.5%; = 0.016; = 61). Patients who received NCRT plus TME demonstrated better cumulative 3 year DFS rates than patients treated with TME plus ACT (85.7% 65.3%; = 0.009) or with TME alone (86.9% 68.9%; = 0.046). No difference in OS was observed among the groups. CONCLUSION: NCRT may improve DFS and LR rates in patients with MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer when compared with TME plus ACT or TME alone. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study illustrated the specific benefit of NCRT on the outcome measures of MRI-defined high-risk rectal cancer compared with TME plus ACT or TME alone, which was not clearly clarified in previous studies enrolling all patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer.
目的:本研究旨在探讨新辅助放化疗(NCRT)加全直肠系膜切除术(TME)是否比 TME 加辅助化疗(ACT)或单纯 TME 更能改善 MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者的预后。
方法:我们回顾性纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 8 月期间接受 NCRT 加 TME、TME 加 ACT 或单纯 TME 治疗的 362 例 MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者。基线 MRI 上具有高危肿瘤分期、阳性外膜静脉侵犯或直肠系膜筋膜受累的病例被认为是高危直肠癌病例。我们将接受 NCRT 加 TME 治疗的患者与接受 TME 加 ACT 治疗的患者和接受单纯 TME 治疗的患者进行匹配。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线比较局部复发(LR)、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)率。
结果:匹配的 NCRT 加 TME 组的累积 3 年 LR 率优于 TME 加 ACT 组(0% 5.1%; = 0.037; = 98)和 TME 单独组(0% 11.5%; = 0.016; = 61)。接受 NCRT 加 TME 治疗的患者的累积 3 年 DFS 率优于 TME 加 ACT 组(85.7% 65.3%; = 0.009)或 TME 单独组(86.9% 68.9%; = 0.046)。各组之间的 OS 无差异。
结论:与 TME 加 ACT 或 TME 单独治疗相比,NCRT 可能改善 MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者的 DFS 和 LR 率。
知识进展:本研究表明,与 TME 加 ACT 或 TME 单独治疗相比,NCRT 对 MRI 定义的高危直肠癌患者的结局指标具有特定的益处,这在之前纳入所有 II/III 期直肠癌患者的研究中并未明确阐明。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-5
World J Gastroenterol. 2020-6-7