Department of Medical Imaging, the Third People's Hospital of Datong City, Datong, Shanxi, P. R. China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 5;100(5):e24251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024251.
Previous meta-analyses examined either multiple tools for the diagnosis of peritoneal metastases (PMs), but not diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), or included only 1 tumor type. This study aimed to determine the summary diagnostic value of DWI/magnetic resonance imaging in determining PMs originating from various tumors.
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched for available papers up to 2019/12. Pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and accuracy were calculated using random-effects models.
Ten studies were included and could be used to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity. The pooled sensitivity of DWI for PMs was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83%-93%). The pooled specificity was 86% (95% CI: 79%-91%). When considering only the retrospective studies, the pooled sensitivity of DWI for PMs was 85% (95% CI: 81%-89%). The pooled specificity was 84% (95% CI: 72%-92%). When considering only the studies about gastrointestinal tumors, the pooled sensitivity of DWI for PMs was 97% (95% CI: 68%-100%). The pooled specificity was 86% (95% CI: 69%-95%). No publication bias was observed (P = dd.27).
DWI magnetic resonance imaging is highly sensitive and specific for the detection of PMs from various abdominal cancers.
之前的荟萃分析检查了用于诊断腹膜转移(PMs)的多种工具,但不包括弥散加权成像(DWI),或仅包括 1 种肿瘤类型。本研究旨在确定 DWI/磁共振成像在确定源自各种肿瘤的 PMs 方面的综合诊断价值。
检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆截至 2019 年 12 月的可用文献。使用随机效应模型计算汇总敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和准确性的估计值。
纳入了 10 项研究,可以用来计算汇总的敏感性和特异性。DWI 对 PMs 的汇总敏感性为 89%(95%置信区间[CI]:83%-93%)。汇总特异性为 86%(95%CI:79%-91%)。仅考虑回顾性研究时,DWI 对 PMs 的汇总敏感性为 85%(95%CI:81%-89%)。汇总特异性为 84%(95%CI:72%-92%)。仅考虑胃肠道肿瘤的研究时,DWI 对 PMs 的汇总敏感性为 97%(95%CI:68%-100%)。汇总特异性为 86%(95%CI:69%-95%)。未观察到发表偏倚(P=0.27)。
DWI 磁共振成像对检测来自各种腹部癌症的 PMs 具有高度的敏感性和特异性。