Suppr超能文献

基于模拟研究的刻度罐中目测血容量。

The visually estimated blood volume in scaled canisters based on a simulation study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb 16;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01265-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The most common technique used worldwide to quantify blood loss during an operation is the visual assessment by the attending intervention team. In every operating room you will find scaled suction canisters that collect fluids from the surgical field. This scaling is commonly used by clinicians for visual assessment of intraoperative blood loss. While many studies have been conducted to quantify and improve the inaccuracy of the visual estimation method, research has focused on the estimation of blood volume in surgical drapes. The question whether and how scaling of canisters correlates with actual blood loss and how accurately clinicians estimate blood loss in scaled canisters has not been the focus of research to date.

METHODS

A simulation study with four "bleeding" scenarios was conducted using expired whole blood donations. After diluting the blood donations with full electrolyte solution, the sample blood loss volume (SBL) was transferred into suction canisters. The study participants then had to estimate the blood loss in all four scenarios. The difference to the reference blood loss (RBL) per scenario was analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three anesthetists participated in the study. The median estimated blood loss was 500 ml (IQR 300/1150) compared to the RBL median of 281.5 ml (IQR 210.0/1022.0). Overestimations up to 1233 ml were detected. Underestimations were also observed in the range of 138 ml. The visual estimate for canisters correlated moderately with RBL (Spearman's rho: 0.818; p < 0.001). Results from univariate nonparametric confirmation statistics regarding visual estimation of canisters show that the deviation of the visual estimate of blood loss is significant (z = - 10.95, p < 0.001, n = 220). Participants' experience level had no significant influence on VEBL (p = 0.402).

CONCLUSION

The discrepancies between the visual estimate of canisters and the actual blood loss are enormous despite the given scales. Therefore, we do not recommend estimating the blood loss visually in scaled suction canisters. Colorimetric blood loss estimation could be a more accurate option.

摘要

背景

目前,全球范围内最常用的术中失血量量化技术是由主治介入团队进行的目测评估。在每个手术室,你都会发现带有刻度的吸引罐,用于收集手术部位的液体。临床医生通常会使用这种刻度来目测评估术中失血量。尽管已经有许多研究致力于量化和提高目测估计方法的不准确性,但研究重点一直是手术巾上的血容量估计。目前,还没有研究关注吸引罐的刻度是否以及如何与实际失血量相关,以及临床医生在刻度吸引罐中估计失血量的准确性。

方法

本研究使用过期全血捐献进行了四项“出血”模拟场景。将血液捐献物用全电解质溶液稀释后,将样本失血量(SBL)转移到吸引罐中。然后,研究参与者必须估计所有四个场景中的失血量。分析每个场景的估计失血量与参考失血量(RBL)的差异。

结果

共有 53 名麻醉师参与了这项研究。与 RBL 的中位数 281.5ml(IQR 210.0/1022.0)相比,中位数估计失血量为 500ml(IQR 300/1150)。发现高达 1233ml 的高估。也观察到 138ml 的低估。吸引罐的目测估计与 RBL 中度相关(Spearman 的 rho:0.818;p<0.001)。关于吸引罐目测估计的单变量非参数验证统计结果表明,失血量的目测估计偏差显著(z=-10.95,p<0.001,n=220)。参与者的经验水平对 VEBL 没有显著影响(p=0.402)。

结论

尽管有给定的刻度,但吸引罐的目测估计与实际失血量之间存在巨大差异。因此,我们不建议在带刻度的吸引罐中目测估计失血量。比色法失血量估计可能是更准确的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d158/7885508/1c9309eae1c1/12871_2021_1265_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

7
Estimation of blood loss is inaccurate and unreliable.失血量的估计是不准确且不可靠的。
Surgery. 2016 Oct;160(4):946-953. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Agreement of surgical blood loss estimation methods.手术失血估计方法的一致性。
Transfusion. 2019 Feb;59(2):508-515. doi: 10.1111/trf.15052. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验