Suppr超能文献

剖宫产术中失血测量的准确性。

Accuracy of Blood Loss Measurement during Cesarean Delivery.

作者信息

Doctorvaladan Sahar V, Jelks Andrea T, Hsieh Eric W, Thurer Robert L, Zakowski Mark I, Lagrew David C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California.

Gauss Surgical, Inc., Los Altos, California.

出版信息

AJP Rep. 2017 Apr;7(2):e93-e100. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601382.

Abstract

This study aims to compare the accuracy of visual, quantitative gravimetric, and colorimetric methods used to determine blood loss during cesarean delivery procedures employing a hemoglobin extraction assay as the reference standard.  In 50 patients having cesarean deliveries blood loss determined by assays of hemoglobin content on surgical sponges and in suction canisters was compared with obstetricians' visual estimates, a quantitative gravimetric method, and the blood loss determined by a novel colorimetric system. Agreement between the reference assay and other measures was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method.  Compared with the blood loss measured by the reference assay (470 ± 296 mL), the colorimetric system (572 ± 334 mL) was more accurate than either visual estimation (928 ± 261 mL) or gravimetric measurement (822 ± 489 mL). The correlation between the assay method and the colorimetric system was more predictive (standardized coefficient = 0.951, adjusted R = 0.902) than either visual estimation (standardized coefficient = 0.700, adjusted R = 00.479) or the gravimetric determination (standardized coefficient = 0.564, adjusted R = 0.304).  During cesarean delivery, measuring blood loss using colorimetric image analysis is superior to visual estimation and a gravimetric method. Implementation of colorimetric analysis may enhance the ability of management protocols to improve clinical outcomes.

摘要

本研究旨在比较视觉法、定量重量法和比色法在剖宫产手术中测定失血情况的准确性,以血红蛋白提取测定法作为参考标准。在50例行剖宫产的患者中,将通过手术海绵和吸引罐中血红蛋白含量测定法确定的失血量与产科医生的视觉估计、定量重量法以及一种新型比色系统确定的失血量进行比较。通过Bland-Altman法评估参考测定法与其他测量方法之间的一致性。与参考测定法测得的失血量(470±296 mL)相比,比色系统(572±334 mL)比视觉估计(928±261 mL)或重量测量(822±489 mL)更准确。测定法与比色系统之间的相关性比视觉估计(标准化系数 = 0.700,调整后R = 00.479)或重量测定(标准化系数 = 0.564,调整后R = 0.304)更具预测性(标准化系数 = 0.951,调整后R = 0.902)。在剖宫产过程中,使用比色图像分析测量失血量优于视觉估计和重量法。比色分析的应用可能会增强管理方案改善临床结局的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcc4/5425292/510d015225b1/10-1055-s-0037-1601382-i170008-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验