Ribeiro Daniel C, Spiers Kate, Thomas Laura, Leilua Kiriffi, Wilkes Matthew, Norton Shontal, Lamb Sarah E
Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation Research, School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 16;11(2):e044462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044462.
To review the reporting of monitoring and implementation of interventions in a selection of trials that assessed the effectiveness of manual therapy and exercise in the management of shoulder subacromial pain.
A review of trials assessing the effectiveness of manual therapy and exercise in the management of patients with shoulder subacromial pain.
We included in our review a selection of 10 trials that were included in a Cochrane review and compared manual therapy and exercise intervention with another intervention. Trials were assessed independently by two reviewers using two checklists: the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) and the Health Behavior Change Consortium treatment fidelity (National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium/NIHBCC).
TIDieR overall scores for individual trials ranged from 11.1% to 45% and fidelity scores ranged from 7% to 50%. On average, trials scored the following within each domain of NIHBCC: study design 51%; training of providers 8%; treatment delivery 15%; treatment receipt 14% and treatment enactment 2.5%.
Little information about the monitoring, implementation and reporting of interventions was provided by trials and that is a barrier for implementing or replicating these interventions. The lack of information regarding the implementation of interventions needs to be taken into account when assessing whether effectiveness of interventions was impacted by their design or due to deviations from the protocol within trials.
回顾一系列评估手法治疗和运动疗法对肩峰下疼痛管理效果的试验中干预措施的监测与实施情况报告。
对评估手法治疗和运动疗法对肩峰下疼痛患者管理效果的试验进行综述。
我们纳入综述的10项试验来自Cochrane综述,这些试验将手法治疗和运动干预与其他干预措施进行了比较。两位评审员使用两份清单对试验进行独立评估:干预描述与复制模板(TIDieR)和健康行为改变联盟治疗保真度(美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟/NIHBCC)。
各试验的TIDieR总体得分在11.1%至45%之间,保真度得分在7%至50%之间。平均而言,各试验在NIHBCC的每个领域得分如下:研究设计51%;提供者培训8%;治疗实施15%;治疗接受14%;治疗执行2.5%。
试验提供的关于干预措施监测、实施和报告的信息很少,这是实施或复制这些干预措施的一个障碍。在评估干预措施的有效性是受其设计影响还是由于试验中偏离方案所致时,需要考虑干预措施实施方面信息的缺失。