• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刺激意识在威胁学习反转中的作用极小。

Evidence for a minimal role of stimulus awareness in reversal of threat learning.

机构信息

Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Learn Mem. 2021 Feb 16;28(3):95-103. doi: 10.1101/lm.050997.119. Print 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1101/lm.050997.119
PMID:33593928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7888237/
Abstract

In an ever-changing environment, survival depends on learning which stimuli represent threat, and also on updating such associations when circumstances shift. It has been claimed that humans can acquire physiological responses to threat-associated stimuli even when they are unaware of them, but the role of awareness in updating threat contingencies remains unknown. This complex process-generating novel responses while suppressing learned ones-relies on distinct neural mechanisms from initial learning, and has only been shown with awareness. Can it occur unconsciously? Here, we present evidence that threat reversal may not require awareness. Participants underwent classical threat conditioning to visual stimuli that were suppressed from awareness. One of two images was paired with an electric shock; halfway through the experiment, contingencies were reversed and the shock was paired with the other image. Despite variations in suppression across participants, we found that physiological responses reflected changes in stimulus-threat pairings independently of stimulus awareness. These findings suggest that unconscious affective processing may be sufficiently flexible to adapt to changing circumstances.

摘要

在不断变化的环境中,生存取决于学习哪些刺激代表威胁,以及在环境变化时更新这些关联。有人声称,即使人类不知道威胁相关的刺激,也可以对其产生生理反应,但意识在更新威胁关联中的作用尚不清楚。这个复杂的过程——在抑制已学习的反应的同时产生新的反应——依赖于与初始学习不同的神经机制,而且只有在有意识的情况下才会出现。它能无意识地发生吗?在这里,我们提供的证据表明,威胁的逆转可能不需要意识。参与者接受了对视觉刺激的经典威胁条件作用,这些刺激是从意识中抑制的。两个图像中的一个与电击配对;在实验进行到一半时,条件作用发生了逆转,电击与另一个图像配对。尽管参与者的抑制程度存在差异,但我们发现生理反应反映了刺激-威胁配对的变化,而与刺激的意识无关。这些发现表明,无意识的情感处理可能具有足够的灵活性,以适应不断变化的环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b2a/7888237/e6676750409f/LM050997Hom_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b2a/7888237/be5678981346/LM050997Hom_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b2a/7888237/bf7af3a1f18d/LM050997Hom_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b2a/7888237/e6676750409f/LM050997Hom_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b2a/7888237/be5678981346/LM050997Hom_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b2a/7888237/bf7af3a1f18d/LM050997Hom_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b2a/7888237/e6676750409f/LM050997Hom_F3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evidence for a minimal role of stimulus awareness in reversal of threat learning.刺激意识在威胁学习反转中的作用极小。
Learn Mem. 2021 Feb 16;28(3):95-103. doi: 10.1101/lm.050997.119. Print 2021 Mar.
2
Dissociation of neural responses and skin conductance reactions during fear conditioning with and without awareness of stimulus contingencies.在有和没有意识到刺激关联性的恐惧条件反射过程中神经反应与皮肤电传导反应的分离。
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):761-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.038. Epub 2006 May 2.
3
Classical conditioning of autonomic fear responses is independent of contingency awareness.自主恐惧反应的经典条件作用与意外事件意识无关。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Oct;36(4):495-500. doi: 10.1037/a0020263.
4
Probing the influence of unconscious fear-conditioned visual stimuli on eye movements.探究无意识恐惧条件视觉刺激对眼球运动的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Nov;46:60-70. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Ultrafast Cortical Gain Adaptation in the Human Brain by Trial-To-Trial Changes of Associative Strength in Fear Learning.恐惧学习中关联强度的逐次试验变化导致人类大脑的超快皮层增益适应。
J Neurosci. 2018 Sep 19;38(38):8262-8276. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0977-18.2018. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
Emotion-attention interactions in fear conditioning: Moderation by executive load, neuroticism, and awareness.恐惧条件作用中的情绪-注意力交互作用:执行负荷、神经质和意识的调节作用
Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt B):213-220. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
7
Impaired differential learning of fear versus safety signs in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症患者在区分恐惧与安全信号方面存在学习障碍。
Psychophysiology. 2022 Feb;59(2):e13956. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13956. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
8
Aversive conditioning under conditions of restricted awareness: effects on spatial cueing.受限意识条件下的厌恶条件作用:对空间线索提示的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Dec;63(12):2336-58. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.492995. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
9
Revaluing the Role of vmPFC in the Acquisition of Pavlovian Threat Conditioning in Humans.重新评估 vmPFC 在人类条件性恐惧反应获得中的作用。
J Neurosci. 2020 Oct 28;40(44):8491-8500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0304-20.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
Clarifying the neural substrates of threat and safety reversal learning in humans.阐明人类威胁和安全反转学习的神经基质。
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 15;207:116427. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116427. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Trait anxiety is associated with hidden state inference during aversive reversal learning.特质焦虑与厌恶反转学习过程中的隐藏状态推断有关。
Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 14;14(1):4203. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39825-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Calibrating the experimental measurement of psychological attributes.校准心理属性的实验测量。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1229-1235. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00976-8. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for unaware fear conditioning.无意识恐惧条件反射证据的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:254-268. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
3
Neural computations of threat in the aftermath of combat trauma.战斗创伤后威胁的神经计算。
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Mar;22(3):470-476. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0315-x. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
4
Between-Subject Variability in the Breaking Continuous Flash Suppression Paradigm: Potential Causes, Consequences, and Solutions.连续闪烁抑制范式中的个体间变异性:潜在原因、后果及解决方案
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 27;8:437. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00437. eCollection 2017.
5
Regressive research: The pitfalls of post hoc data selection in the study of unconscious mental processes.回归性研究:无意识心理过程研究中事后数据选择的陷阱。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):752-775. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1170-y.
6
Instructed knowledge shapes feedback-driven aversive learning in striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, but not the amygdala.指导知识塑造了纹状体和眶额皮质中的反馈驱动的厌恶学习,但杏仁核则不然。
Elife. 2016 May 12;5:e15192. doi: 10.7554/eLife.15192.
7
The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective.反转学习的神经基础:一个更新的视角。
Neuroscience. 2017 Mar 14;345:12-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.021. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
8
Optimising a model-based approach to inferring fear learning from skin conductance responses.优化基于模型的方法以从皮肤电导率反应推断恐惧学习。
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Nov 30;255:131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.009. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Invisible Stimuli, Implicit Thresholds: Why Invisibility Judgments Cannot be Interpreted in Isolation.不可见刺激、内隐阈值:为何不可见性判断不能孤立解读。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2015 Jun 30;11(2):31-41. doi: 10.5709/acp-0169-3. eCollection 2015.
10
Updated meta-analysis of classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders.焦虑症中经典恐惧条件作用的更新荟萃分析。
Depress Anxiety. 2015 Apr;32(4):239-53. doi: 10.1002/da.22353. Epub 2015 Feb 20.