Life Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, 45 - 3601, Parkstraat, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Jun;29(6):940-948. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00822-z. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
Studies in the sociology of genetics have shown how living with a predisposition to a genetic disorder often comes with significant psycho-social burdens and struggles. One of these struggles is the fear of genetic discrimination. Despite genetic non-discrimination regulations, research shows people still worry about being subjected to genetic discrimination. This article adds to this existing body of literature by showing why people still worry about genetic discrimination and how they cope with these worries. Our findings derive from an analysis of semi-structured, in-depth interviews with individuals at risk for Huntington's disease (HD) in Belgium. Concerns of genetic discrimination are grounded in the participants' family backgrounds. Our participants, having witnessed numerous events in which symptomatic relatives suffered discrimination and stigmatisation, expressed heightened fears of facing genetic discrimination. Further, this article provides insight into the strategies participants use to cope with these fears. Two ways of normalising life were identified-while some persist in keeping their genetic risk a secret, other participants explicitly choose to be transparent about their genetic risk, desiring a level of openness. However, while they want to 'break' with their family background, participants who choose to be open are still held back by their worries about genetic discrimination by organisational actors. 'Normalising genetics' appears to be particularly challenging considering the remaining stereotypes and stigma surrounding genetic diseases.
遗传学社会学的研究表明,携带遗传疾病倾向的人通常会承受巨大的心理和社会负担。其中一个负担是对遗传歧视的恐惧。尽管有遗传歧视法规,但研究表明,人们仍然担心会受到遗传歧视。本文通过展示人们为什么仍然担心遗传歧视以及他们如何应对这些担忧,增加了这一现有文献的内容。我们的研究结果来源于对比利时亨廷顿病(HD)高危人群进行的半结构化深入访谈的分析。对遗传歧视的担忧源于参与者的家庭背景。我们的参与者曾目睹过许多有症状的亲属遭受歧视和污名化的事件,因此对面临遗传歧视的恐惧加剧。此外,本文还深入了解了参与者用来应对这些担忧的策略。确定了两种使生活正常化的方式——一些人仍然将遗传风险保密,而其他参与者则明确选择公开自己的遗传风险,希望保持一定程度的开放。然而,尽管参与者希望与自己的家庭背景“划清界限”,但选择公开的参与者仍然受到组织参与者遗传歧视担忧的限制。考虑到围绕遗传疾病的残余刻板印象和污名,“使遗传学正常化”似乎特别具有挑战性。