• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球对遗传歧视的恐惧和担忧趋势:系统文献综述。

Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

机构信息

Life Sciences and Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr;61(4):275-82. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.151. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1038/jhg.2015.151
PMID:26740237
Abstract

Since the 1990s, developments in the field of genetics have led to many questions on the use and possible misuse of genetic information. 'Genetic discrimination' has been defined as the differential treatment of asymptomatic individuals or their relatives on the basis of their real or assumed genetic characteristics. Despite the public policy attention around genetic discrimination, there is currently still much confusion surrounding this phenomenon. On the one hand, there is little evidence of the occurrence of genetic discrimination. On the other hand, it appears that people remain concerned about this theme, and this fear influences their health and life choices. This article makes use of a systematic literature review to investigate what is already known about the nature, extent and background of these fears and concerns. The 42 included studies have found considerable levels of concerns about genetic discrimination. Concerns dominate in insurance contexts and within personal interactions. The extent of concerns appears to vary depending on the type of genetic illness. Furthermore, installed laws prohibiting genetic discrimination do not seem to alleviate existing fears. This raises important questions as to the origins of these fears. Based on the findings, recommendations for future research are made. First, research on the background of fears is needed. Second, future research needs to assess more fully all different forms (for example, direct and indirect) of genetic discrimination. Thirdly, it has to be studied whether genetic discrimination is a form of discrimination that is distinguishable from discrimination based on an illness or disability. Finally, a last element that should be addressed in future research is the most recent developments in research on genomics, such as next-generation sequencing or genome-wide association studies.

摘要

自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,遗传学领域的发展引发了许多关于使用和可能滥用遗传信息的问题。“遗传歧视”被定义为根据个体真实或假定的遗传特征,对无症状个体或其亲属进行差别待遇。尽管公众政策关注遗传歧视,但目前对这一现象仍存在许多混淆。一方面,遗传歧视的发生证据很少。另一方面,人们似乎仍然对这一主题感到担忧,这种担忧影响了他们的健康和生活选择。本文利用系统文献综述,调查了人们对这一恐惧和担忧的性质、程度和背景的已有认识。所纳入的 42 项研究发现,人们对遗传歧视的担忧程度相当高。担忧主要集中在保险领域和个人互动中。担忧的程度似乎取决于遗传疾病的类型。此外,禁止遗传歧视的既定法律似乎并没有减轻现有的担忧。这就提出了这些担忧的根源的重要问题。基于这些发现,提出了对未来研究的建议。首先,需要研究恐惧的背景。其次,未来的研究需要更全面地评估所有不同形式(例如直接和间接)的遗传歧视。第三,必须研究遗传歧视是否是一种与疾病或残疾歧视不同的歧视形式。最后,未来研究中应解决的另一个要素是基因组学研究的最新进展,例如下一代测序或全基因组关联研究。

相似文献

1
Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.全球对遗传歧视的恐惧和担忧趋势:系统文献综述。
J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr;61(4):275-82. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2015.151. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
8
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
9
Speech changes in old age: Methodological considerations for speech-based discrimination of healthy ageing and Alzheimer's disease.老年言语变化:基于言语的健康衰老与阿尔茨海默病鉴别方法学的考虑。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jan-Feb;59(1):13-37. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12888. Epub 2023 May 4.
10
Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.分娩期女性的疼痛管理:系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD009234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009234.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Personalized Medicine Approach is Best for Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.个性化医疗方法最适合纯合子家族性高胆固醇血症患者。
Med Res Arch. 2024 Dec;12(12). doi: 10.18103/mra.v12i12.6160. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
2
A roadmap for genome projects to foster psychosocial and economic evidence to further policy and practice.基因组计划路线图,以促进社会心理和经济证据,推动政策与实践发展。
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 May 27;5(1):198. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00917-4.
3
Genetic discrimination in insurance and employment based on personalized risk stratification for breast cancer screening.

本文引用的文献

1
Public awareness of genetic nondiscrimination laws in four states and perceived importance of life insurance protections.四个州公众对基因非歧视法的认知以及人寿保险保护的感知重要性。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Jun;24(3):512-21. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9771-y. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
2
What Factors Impact upon a Woman's Decision to Undertake Genetic Cancer Testing?哪些因素影响女性进行癌症基因检测的决定?
Front Oncol. 2014 Jan 6;3:325. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00325.
3
Life insurance: genomic stratification and risk classification.人寿保险:基因组分层与风险分类。
基于乳腺癌筛查个性化风险分层的保险和就业中的基因歧视。
Front Genet. 2025 Mar 5;16:1481863. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1481863. eCollection 2025.
4
Revolutionising Cardio-Oncology Care with Precision Genomics.精准基因组学彻底变革心血管肿瘤学护理
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Feb 26;26(5):2052. doi: 10.3390/ijms26052052.
5
Public awareness, attitudes, and motivation toward biobanks: a survey of China.公众对生物样本库的认知、态度及动机:一项中国调查
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jan 11;26(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01163-y.
6
Ethical issues in genomics research in persons with Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease-related dementia (AD/ADRD): a systematic review.阿尔茨海默病/阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)患者中基因组学研究的伦理问题:系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Nov 25;25(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01141-w.
7
Predicting age of onset and progression of disease in late-onset genetic neurodegenerative diseases: An ethics review and research agenda.预测晚发性遗传神经退行性疾病的发病年龄和疾病进展:伦理审查和研究议程。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Nov;32(11):1361-1370. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01688-7. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
8
Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing: 30 Years of Impact on Cancer Care.遗传性癌症基因检测:对癌症护理产生影响的30年。
Dela J Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):16-20. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.08.06. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Newborn Screening Program Using Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in One Maternity Hospital in Southern Belgium.比利时南部一家妇产医院使用靶向新一代测序技术进行新生儿筛查项目的可行性和可接受性
Children (Basel). 2024 Jul 30;11(8):926. doi: 10.3390/children11080926.
10
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and workplace genetic testing: Knowledge and perceptions of employed adults in the United States.《遗传信息非歧视法案》与职场基因检测:美国在职成年人的知识与认知
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1945. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1945. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 May;22(5):575-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.228. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
4
Perception, experience, and response to genetic discrimination in Huntington's disease: the Australian results of The International RESPOND-HD study.亨廷顿舞蹈症患者对基因歧视的认知、经历及反应:国际 RESPOND-HD 研究的澳大利亚结果
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013 Feb;17(2):115-21. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0288. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
5
Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.消费者对《遗传信息非歧视法案》颁布后的保险歧视的认知和态度。
Fam Cancer. 2012 Dec;11(4):637-44. doi: 10.1007/s10689-012-9564-0.
6
Genetic discrimination: international perspectives.遗传歧视:国际视角。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2012;13:433-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163800. Epub 2012 May 15.
7
Unravelling fears of genetic discrimination: an exploratory study of Dutch HCM families in an era of genetic non-discrimination acts.揭开对基因歧视的恐惧:遗传非歧视法案时代荷兰肥厚型心肌病家庭的探索性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Oct;20(10):1018-23. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.53. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
8
Beyond the patient: the broader impact of genetic discrimination among individuals at risk of Huntington disease.超越患者:亨廷顿病风险个体中遗传歧视的更广泛影响。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2012 Mar;159B(2):217-26. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32016. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
Why is genetic screening for autosomal dominant disorders underused in families? The case of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.为什么在家族中对常染色体显性遗传病的基因筛查未得到充分应用?以遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症为例。
Genet Med. 2011 Sep;13(9):812-20. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821d2e6d.
10
A population-based survey in Australia of men's and women's perceptions of genetic risk and predictive genetic testing and implications for primary care.澳大利亚一项基于人群的调查,涉及男性和女性对遗传风险、预测性基因检测的认知以及对初级保健的影响。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(6):325-36. doi: 10.1159/000324706. Epub 2011 Apr 13.