• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产后输卵管切除术与阴道分娩后常规输卵管结扎术比较。

Postpartum Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar 1;137(3):514-520. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004285.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004285
PMID:33595245
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare operative outcomes of postpartum salpingectomy and tubal ligation after vaginal delivery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified patients who underwent tubal sterilization between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019, at a large academic hospital, using the electronic medical record. All patients who delivered vaginally and underwent tubal sterilization during their delivery admissions were included. The primary outcome was total operative time. Secondary outcomes included estimated blood loss, perioperative complications, and readmission within 6 weeks postpartum. Patients who underwent bilateral tubal ligation were compared with those who underwent bilateral salpingectomy using Pearson's χ2 test, Fisher exact, and Student's t test.

RESULTS

A total of 317 eligible patients were identified. One hundred and six (94%) salpingectomies were completed using a bipolar electrocautery device. Operative time was 3 minutes shorter in the salpingectomy group, 30 minutes (interquartile range 24-38) compared with 33.5 (26-42) minutes, P=.032. Patients who underwent salpingectomy were more likely to have estimated blood loss of 5 mL or less (our institutional shorthand for minimal blood loss) than women who underwent bilateral tubal ligation (78 [69%] vs 112 [55%], P=.015). There were no significant differences in perioperative complications between the groups.

CONCLUSION

When using electrocautery, bilateral salpingectomy can be completed in the immediate postpartum period after vaginal delivery with equivalent operative times to bilateral tubal ligation.

摘要

目的

比较阴道分娩后行输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术的手术结果。

方法

本回顾性队列研究使用电子病历,于 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日,在一家大型学术医院中确定行输卵管绝育术的患者。所有经阴道分娩且在分娩住院期间行输卵管绝育术的患者均被纳入研究。主要结局指标为总手术时间。次要结局指标包括估计出血量、围手术期并发症和产后 6 周内再入院。采用 Pearson χ2 检验、Fisher 确切检验和学生 t 检验比较行双侧输卵管结扎术与双侧输卵管切除术的患者。

结果

共确定了 317 名符合条件的患者。106 例(94%)输卵管切除术采用双极电凝设备完成。输卵管切除术组的手术时间缩短了 3 分钟,为 30 分钟(四分位距 24-38),而输卵管结扎组为 33.5 分钟(26-42),P=.032。与行双侧输卵管结扎术的患者相比,行输卵管切除术的患者更可能出现估计出血量为 5 mL 或更少(本机构用于表示微量出血的简写)(78 [69%] 例 vs 112 [55%] 例,P=.015)。两组患者围手术期并发症无显著差异。

结论

使用电灼时,经阴道分娩后即刻行双侧输卵管切除术可获得与双侧输卵管结扎术相当的手术时间。

相似文献

1
Postpartum Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery.产后输卵管切除术与阴道分娩后常规输卵管结扎术比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar 1;137(3):514-520. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004285.
2
Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.剖宫产时行输卵管切除术与标准产后输卵管结扎术的可行性比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):20-27. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002646.
3
Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.剖宫产时行输卵管切除术与结扎术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002674.
4
Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?产后永久性绝育:双侧输卵管切除术能否取代双侧输卵管结扎术?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):928-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 24.
5
Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.剖宫产时行随机输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术的成本效益比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):106.e1-106.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.绝育输卵管切除术:2011 - 2016年大型综合医疗保健系统中的实践变化
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):961-967. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002312.
7
Postpartum Opportunistic Salpingectomy Compared With Bilateral Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.产后机会性输卵管切除术与经阴道分娩后双侧输卵管结扎术降低卵巢癌风险的比较:一项成本效益分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr 1;141(4):819-827. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005118. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
8
Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.美国剖宫产术中从输卵管结扎到偶然输卵管切除术的范式转变。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):399.e1-399.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.074. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
9
Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.剖宫产术中行输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术用于永久性避孕:结局和医生态度。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):860-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
10
Racial Disparities in Sterilization Procedure Performed at Time of Cesarean Section.剖宫产时实施绝育手术的种族差异。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e934-e938. doi: 10.1055/a-1974-9507. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of salpingectomy versus tubal ligation on postoperative wound infection in patients: A meta-analysis.输卵管切除术与输卵管结扎术对患者术后伤口感染的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14543. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14543.
2
Beyond Sterilization: A Comprehensive Review on the Safety and Efficacy of Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Preventative Strategy for Ovarian Cancer.超越绝育:机会性输卵管切除术作为卵巢癌预防策略的安全性和有效性的全面综述。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 28;30(12):10152-10165. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120739.
3
A Prospective Quality Improvement Initiative to Address the Barriers to Postpartum Tubal Ligation Among Multiparous Women.
一项旨在解决经产妇产后输卵管结扎障碍的前瞻性质量改进计划。
Cureus. 2022 Sep 27;14(9):e29641. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29641. eCollection 2022 Sep.