• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颅内未破裂动脉瘤的 Enterprise 支架血管内治疗与 Neuroform 或 Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support 支架的比较。

Endovascular treatment with the Enterprise stent versus the Neuroform or Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support stent for unruptured aneurysms.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices, Franchise Health Economics & Market Access, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Mar;10(4):295-305. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0202. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

DOI:10.2217/cer-2020-0202
PMID:33595342
Abstract

To compare outcomes among patients undergoing endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) with the Enterprise stent versus the Neuroform or Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) stent. Patients undergoing endovascular procedure for UIA were classified into Enterprise stent and Neuroform or LVIS stent group. Groups were propensity-score matched and generalized estimating equations were used for outcomes assessment. There were no significant between-group differences in length of stay or mortality. The Enterprise group had significantly lower odds of UIA-related inpatient readmissions versus the Neuroform/LVIS group (odds ratio: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.91). Enterprise stent use was associated with significantly lower readmissions versus competitor stent, with no difference in other study outcomes.

摘要

比较颅内未破裂动脉瘤(UIA)患者行血管内治疗中使用 Enterprise 支架与 Neuroform 或 Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support(LVIS)支架的结局。将接受血管内 UIA 治疗的患者分为 Enterprise 支架组和 Neuroform 或 LVIS 支架组。对两组进行倾向评分匹配,并使用广义估计方程评估结局。两组患者的住院时间或死亡率无显著差异。与 Neuroform/LVIS 组相比,Enterprise 组 UIA 相关再入院的可能性显著降低(比值比:0.62;95%CI:0.42-0.91)。与竞品支架相比,Enterprise 支架的使用与再入院率显著降低相关,其他研究结局无差异。

相似文献

1
Endovascular treatment with the Enterprise stent versus the Neuroform or Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support stent for unruptured aneurysms.颅内未破裂动脉瘤的 Enterprise 支架血管内治疗与 Neuroform 或 Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support 支架的比较。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Mar;10(4):295-305. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0202. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Enterprise stents versus low-profile visualized intraluminal support stents for stent-assisted coiling of unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms.企业支架与低轮廓可视化腔内支撑支架用于未破裂床突旁动脉瘤的支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的比较
Technol Health Care. 2023;31(5):1855-1865. doi: 10.3233/THC-220697.
3
Clinical and angiographic outcomes of stent-assisted coiling of paraclinoid aneurysms: Comparison of LVIS and Neuroform stents.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅底旁动脉瘤的临床和血管造影结果:LVIS 和 Neuroform 支架的比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jan;83:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.047. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
4
Comparison of LVIS and Enterprise stent-assisted coiling embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study.LVIS 与 Enterprise 支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的比较:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Sep 7;47(1):560. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02756-8.
5
Comparative analysis of long term effectiveness of Neuroform Atlas stent versus low profile visualized intraluminal stent/Woven EndoBridge devices in treatment of wide necked intracranial aneurysms.Neuroform Atlas 支架与低剖面可视化内支架/编织 EndoBridge 装置治疗宽颈颅内动脉瘤的长期疗效比较分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Oct 14;16(11):1115-1118. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020716.
6
Comparison of Stent-Assisted Coiling for Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms Between LVIS or LVIS Jr. and Enterprise VRD: A Retrospective and Single-Center Analysis.LVIS 或 LVIS Jr. 与 Enterprise VRD 支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗未破裂颈内动脉动脉瘤的比较:回顾性单中心分析。
Turk Neurosurg. 2021;31(3):379-384. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.31089-20.2.
7
Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms: a single-center clinical and angiographic analysis.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内动脉瘤:单中心临床及血管造影分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Jul;10(7):687-692. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013272. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
Comparison of Recanalization and In-Stent Stenosis Between the Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Stent and Enterprise Stent-Assisted Coiling for 254 Intracranial Aneurysms.254 例颅内动脉瘤患者采用可视化小口径颅内支撑导管与 Enterprise 支架辅助弹簧圈治疗的再通率与支架内狭窄比较。
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e99-e104. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.112. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
9
Safety and effectiveness of the Low Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS and LVIS Jr) devices in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results of the TRAIL multicenter observational study.颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗中使用低轮廓可视化腔内支撑装置(LVIS 和 LVIS Jr)的安全性和有效性:TRAIL 多中心观察性研究结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Jul;10(7):675-681. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013375. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
10
Endovascular treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms: feasibility and successful employment of a new low profile visible intraluminal support (LVIS) EVO stent.颅内动脉瘤患者的血管内治疗:新型低剖面可视管腔内支撑(LVIS EVO)支架的可行性和成功应用。
Neuroradiol J. 2020 Oct;33(5):377-385. doi: 10.1177/1971400920941402. Epub 2020 Jul 21.