Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
Centre for Clinical Research Sörmland, Uppsala University, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 17;23(2):e22668. doi: 10.2196/22668.
As patients are increasingly searching for information about their medical condition on the internet, there is a need for health professionals to be able to guide patients toward reliable and suitable information sources on the internet.
The aim of the study was to develop a clinical tool for health care professionals to assess the usability and quality of the content of websites containing medical information that could be recommended to patients.
A 3-round modified electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study was conducted with 20 health care professionals.
In round one of the eDelphi study, of the 68 items initially created, 41 items (29 on usability and 12 on content) were rated as important or very important by more than half of the panel and thus selected for further evaluation in round two. In round two, of the 41 items chosen from round 1, 19 were selected (9 on usability and 10 on content) as important or very important by more than half of the panel for further evaluation. As a result of round three, 2 items were combined as a single item, leaving the instrument with 18 items in total (8 on usability and 10 on content). The tool is freely accessible online.
The CUE-tool can be used to (1) evaluate the usability and reliability of the content of websites before recommending them to patients as a good information source; (2) identify websites that do not have reliable content or may be difficult for patients to use; (3) develop quality websites by using the criteria in the CUE-tool; and (4) identify different qualities between different websites.
随着患者越来越多地在互联网上搜索有关其医疗状况的信息,健康专业人员需要能够引导患者找到互联网上可靠且合适的信息来源。
本研究旨在为医疗保健专业人员开发一种临床工具,以评估包含可向患者推荐的医疗信息的网站的内容可用性和质量。
对 20 名医疗保健专业人员进行了三轮改良电子 Delphi(eDelphi)研究。
在 eDelphi 研究的第一轮中,最初创建的 68 个项目中,有 41 个项目(29 个关于可用性,12 个关于内容)被超过一半的专家小组评为重要或非常重要,并因此被选中用于第二轮进一步评估。在第二轮中,从第一轮中选择的 41 个项目中,有 19 个(9 个关于可用性,10 个关于内容)被超过一半的专家小组评为重要或非常重要,以便进一步评估。经过第三轮,2 个项目被合并为一个单一项目,使该工具总共包含 18 个项目(8 个关于可用性,10 个关于内容)。该工具可在线免费获取。
CUE 工具可用于:(1)在向患者推荐作为良好信息源之前,评估网站的可用性和内容可靠性;(2)识别内容不可靠或患者可能难以使用的网站;(3)使用 CUE 工具中的标准开发优质网站;以及(4)识别不同网站之间的不同质量。