Suppr超能文献

开发一种评估医疗保健专业人员药物信息来源完整性的工具:一项德尔菲研究。

Development of a tool to assess the completeness of drug information sources for health care professionals: A Delphi study.

机构信息

Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisbon, Portugal.

Department of Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, 410 N 12th Street P.O. Box 980533, Richmond, VA 23298-0533, United States.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;90:87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 30.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to create a standard set of essential drug information items as a tool to assess the completeness of any type of drug information source, regardless of its length, using a Delphi consensus panel of European health care professionals. A compilation of drug-related information items was performed by searching several resources for health care professionals and a final list of 162 items was obtained. Fifty-seven experts in drug information from 23 different European countries were invited to participate in a three-round Delphi technique to obtain consensus on items considered essential and non-essential content of information. Consensus for the first, second, and third rounds was defined as ≥90%, ≥80%, and ≥75% agreement, respectively. Of the 57 experts invited, 32 completed the first round, 27 the second, and 29 the third. Consensus was achieved for 28.3% of the items in the first round, 49.3% in the second, and 58.3% in the third. The final cumulative consensus was 67.7% (n = 126) for items considered essential and 16.1% (n = 30) for items considered non-essential. The final tool obtained to assess the completeness of drug information sources was composed by 126 essential items grouped into 11 sections. This tool allows for the comparison of different information sources for the same medicine and the information content for different medicines in the same source.

摘要

本研究旨在创建一套标准的基本药物信息项目,作为一种工具,通过欧洲医疗保健专业人员德尔菲共识小组,评估任何类型的药物信息源的完整性,而不论其长度如何。通过搜索多个医疗保健专业人员资源,编制了与药物相关的信息项目,最终获得了 162 项信息。邀请了来自 23 个不同欧洲国家的 57 名药物信息专家参加三轮德尔菲技术,以就被认为是基本和非基本信息内容的项目达成共识。第一、第二和第三轮的共识定义为分别≥90%、≥80%和≥75%的一致性。在受邀的 57 名专家中,有 32 名完成了第一轮,27 名完成了第二轮,29 名完成了第三轮。第一轮有 28.3%的项目达成共识,第二轮有 49.3%,第三轮有 58.3%。最终的累积共识为 67.7%(n=126)的项目被认为是基本的,16.1%(n=30)的项目被认为是非基本的。最终获得的评估药物信息源完整性的工具由 126 项基本项目组成,分为 11 个部分。该工具允许比较同一种药物的不同信息源,以及同一种药物的不同信息内容。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验