TIMI Study Group, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):499-507. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7585.
Dapagliflozin has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (HF) in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, clinical inertia often underlies deferred initiation of effective therapies.
To examine timing of onset of clinical benefit with dapagliflozin and magnitude as a function of proximity to prior HF hospitalization.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a secondary analysis of a completed multinational trial. The Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse-Outcomes in Heart Failure trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of dapagliflozin in patients with chronic HFrEF (n = 4744). From February 2017 to August 2018, the study enrolled patients in New York Heart Association classes II through IV and with left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less; the median (range) follow-up time was 18.2 (0-27.8) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for the primary efficacy outcome with dapagliflozin vs placebo by time following randomization. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin were assessed according to the timing of the most recent HF hospitalization prior to trial enrollment.
None.
Composite of cardiovascular death or worsening HF.
A total of 4744 patients were included (1109 women [23.4%]; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [10.9] years). The reduction in the primary outcome with dapagliflozin was rapidly apparent, with a sustained statistically significant benefit by 28 days after randomization (HR at 28 days, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.94]; P = .03). A total of 2251 patients (47.4%) had been previously hospitalized for HF, and 1301 (27.4%) had been hospitalized within 12 months prior to enrollment. Among patients treated with placebo, there was a stepwise gradient of risk for the primary outcome according to timing of most recent HF hospitalization, with 2-year Kaplan-Meier rates of 21.1%, 25.3%, and 33.8% (adjusted P = .003) for patients with a prior HF hospitalization never, more than 12 months ago, and 12 or fewer months ago, respectively. Across these subgroups, dapagliflozin reduced the relative risk of the primary outcome by 16% (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.69-1.01]), 27% (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.54-0.99]), and 36% (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51-0.80]), respectively (P = .07 for trend). Accordingly, patients with a more recent HF hospitalization tended to experience greater absolute risk reductions with dapagliflozin at 2 years: 2.1% (95% CI, -1.9% to 6.1%), 4.1% (95% CI, -3.6% to 11.7%), and 9.9% (95% CI, 3.3%-16.5%), respectively (P = .05 for trend).
In this study, treatment with dapagliflozin was associated with rapid reduction in the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening HF, with a sustained statistically significant benefit emerging very early after randomization. Patients with a more recent HF hospitalization were at particularly high risk and experienced greater relative and absolute risk reductions with dapagliflozin.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03036124.
达格列净已被证明可降低慢性射血分数降低心衰(HFrEF)患者心血管死亡或心衰恶化的风险。然而,临床惰性常常导致有效治疗的延迟启动。
研究达格列净起始治疗的临床获益时间,并评估其与心衰住院时间的相关性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项已完成的多国试验的二次分析。达格列净预防心衰不良结局试验(DAPA-HF)是一项双盲、安慰剂对照的随机临床试验,纳入了慢性 HFrEF 患者(n=4744)。从 2017 年 2 月至 2018 年 8 月,研究纳入了纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级 II 至 IV 级和左心室射血分数(LVEF)<40%的患者;中位(范围)随访时间为 18.2(0-27.8)个月。通过随机分组后时间计算达格列净与安慰剂的主要疗效结局的风险比(HR)。根据试验前最近一次心衰住院的时间,评估达格列净的疗效和安全性。
无。
心血管死亡或心衰恶化的复合结局。
共纳入 4744 例患者(1109 例女性[23.4%];平均[标准差]年龄为 66.3[10.9]岁)。达格列净治疗后,主要结局的降低迅速显现,随机分组后 28 天即出现持续的统计学显著获益(28 天的 HR,0.51[95%置信区间,0.28-0.94];P=0.03)。共有 2251 例患者(47.4%)曾因心衰住院,1301 例(27.4%)在入组前 12 个月内住院。在接受安慰剂治疗的患者中,根据最近一次心衰住院时间,主要结局的风险呈逐步递增梯度,安慰剂组 2 年Kaplan-Meier 发生率分别为 21.1%、25.3%和 33.8%(调整后的 P=0.003),分别为既往心衰住院时间从未、>12 个月前和 12 个月内的患者。在这些亚组中,达格列净分别降低了主要结局的相对风险 16%(HR,0.84[95%置信区间,0.69-1.01])、27%(HR,0.73[95%置信区间,0.54-0.99])和 36%(HR,0.64[95%置信区间,0.51-0.80])(趋势检验的 P=0.07)。因此,最近一次心衰住院的患者在 2 年时更倾向于从达格列净治疗中获得更大的绝对风险降低:2.1%(95%置信区间,-1.9%至 6.1%)、4.1%(95%置信区间,-3.6%至 11.7%)和 9.9%(95%置信区间,3.3%-16.5%)(趋势检验的 P=0.05)。
在这项研究中,达格列净治疗与心血管死亡或心衰恶化风险的迅速降低相关,随机分组后很快出现持续的统计学显著获益。最近一次心衰住院的患者风险特别高,并且从达格列净治疗中获得了更大的相对和绝对风险降低。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT03036124。