Center for Applied Economics, Agriculture and the Environment, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Population Research Center and Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin, TX, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0245011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245011. eCollection 2021.
We analyze the trade-offs between health and the economy during the period of social distancing in São Paulo, the state hardest hit by the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. We use longitudinal data with municipal-level information and check the robustness of our estimates to several sources of bias, including spatial dependence, reverse causality, and time-variant omitted variables. We use exogenous climate shocks as instruments for social distancing since people are more likely to stay home in wetter and colder periods. Our findings suggest that the health benefits of social distancing differ by levels of municipal development and may have vanished if the COVID-19 spread was not controlled in neighboring municipalities. In turn, we did not find evidence that municipalities with tougher social distancing performed worse economically. Our results also highlight that estimates that do not account for endogeneity may largely underestimate the benefits of social distancing on reducing the spread of COVID-19.
我们分析了在巴西 COVID-19 大流行最严重的州圣保罗实行社交隔离期间健康与经济之间的权衡取舍。我们使用具有市级信息的纵向数据,并检查了我们的估计值对几种偏差来源的稳健性,包括空间依赖性、反向因果关系和时变遗漏变量。我们将气候冲击作为社交隔离的工具,因为在潮湿和寒冷的时期,人们更有可能待在家里。我们的研究结果表明,社交隔离的健康益处因城市发展水平而异,如果相邻城市没有控制 COVID-19 的传播,这种益处可能已经消失。相反,我们没有发现实施更严格社交隔离措施的城市在经济方面表现更差的证据。我们的研究结果还强调,不考虑内生性的估计可能会大大低估社交隔离对减少 COVID-19 传播的益处。