Suppr超能文献

巴西唇、口腔和口咽癌的直接医疗成本。

Direct healthcare costs of lip, oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer in Brazil.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246475. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The efficiency of public policies includes the measurement of the health resources used and their associated costs. There is a lack of studies evaluating the economic impact of oral cancer (OC). This study aims to estimate the healthcare costs of OC in Brazil from 2008 to 2016. This is a partial economic evaluation using the gross costing top-down method, considering the direct healthcare costs related to outpatients, inpatients, intensive care units, and the number of procedures, from the perspective of the public health sector. The data were extracted from the Outpatient and Inpatient Information System of the National Health System, by diagnosis according to the 10th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases, according to sites of interest: C00 to C06, C09 and C10. The values were adjusted for annual accumulated inflation and expressed in 2018 I$ (1 I$ = R$2,044). Expenditure on OC healthcare in Brazil was I$495.6 million, which was composed of 50.8% (I$251.6 million) outpatient and 49.2% (I$244.0 million) inpatient healthcare. About 177,317 admissions and 6,224,236 outpatient procedures were registered. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy comprised the largest number of procedures (88.8%) and costs (94.9%). Most of the costs were spent on people over 50 years old (72.9%) and on males (75.6%). Direct healthcare costs in Brazil for OC are substantial. Outpatient procedures were responsible for the highest total cost; however, inpatient procedures had a higher cost per procedure. Men over 50 years old consumed most of the cost and procedures for OC. The oropharynx and tongue were the sites with the highest expenditure. Further studies are needed to investigate the cost per individual, as well as direct non-medical and indirect costs of OC.

摘要

公共政策的效率包括对所使用的卫生资源及其相关成本的衡量。目前缺乏评估口腔癌(OC)经济影响的研究。本研究旨在估计 2008 年至 2016 年巴西 OC 的医疗保健成本。这是一项使用自上而下的总费用法进行的部分经济评估,从公共卫生部门的角度考虑了与门诊、住院、重症监护病房和程序数量相关的直接医疗保健成本。数据来自国家卫生系统的门诊和住院病人信息系统,根据国际疾病分类第 10 次修订版的诊断进行提取,按关注部位分类:C00 至 C06、C09 和 C10。按 2018 年 I$(1 I$=R$2.044)表示的年度累计通胀进行了调整。巴西 OC 医疗保健支出为 4.956 亿 I$,其中 50.8%(2.516 亿 I$)为门诊支出,49.2%(2.440 亿 I$)为住院支出。共记录了 177317 次住院和 6224236 次门诊程序。化疗和放疗构成了最大数量的程序(88.8%)和费用(94.9%)。大部分费用发生在 50 岁以上人群(72.9%)和男性(75.6%)。巴西 OC 的直接医疗保健成本很高。门诊程序的总成本最高;然而,住院程序的每例程序成本更高。50 岁以上的男性消耗了 OC 大部分的费用和程序。口咽和舌是支出最高的部位。需要进一步研究 OC 的个体成本以及直接非医疗和间接成本。

相似文献

1
Direct healthcare costs of lip, oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer in Brazil.巴西唇、口腔和口咽癌的直接医疗成本。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 17;16(2):e0246475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246475. eCollection 2021.
4
Direct healthcare costs of spinal disorders in Brazil.巴西脊柱疾病的直接医疗成本。
Int J Public Health. 2019 Jul;64(6):965-974. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01211-6. Epub 2019 May 15.

引用本文的文献

6
The cost of oral cancer: A systematic review.口腔癌的成本:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0266346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266346. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of different guidelines for oral cancer.不同口腔癌指南的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Aug;278(8):2961-2973. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06423-8. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review.巴西癌症的卫生经济评估:一项系统综述。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jul 27;6:205. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00205. eCollection 2018.
10
Cost of treatment for head and neck cancer in India.印度头颈癌的治疗费用。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0191132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191132. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验