Addiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Addiction Sciences Division, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA,
Psychopathology. 2021;54(2):70-77. doi: 10.1159/000512661. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
Shared neurobehavioral characteristics of bipolar disorder (BD) and alcohol dependence (AD), including heightened sensitivity to reward (SR), may account for high rates of BD and AD co-occurrence (BD + AD). However, empirical research is lacking. The present multimethod investigation examined SR and sensitivity to punishment (SP) among these patient groups using a reliable and well-validated self-report questionnaire of SR and SP along with a laboratory task specifically designed to distinguish SR and SP activation.
One-hundred participants formed 4 groups: BD + AD (n = 40), BD (n = 18), AD (n = 25), and healthy controls (n = 17). Clinical interviews were administered, and participants completed the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSR-Q) and the Point Score Reaction Test behavioral task. Pearson correlations, hierarchical linear regression, and 2 × 2 factorial general linear modeling with Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons were performed.
BD and AD main effects were significant on self-reported SR and SP; however, BD × AD interactions were not. BD + AD individuals were significantly higher on self-reported SR than BD and AD individuals, yet all clinical groups were similar on SP. Behavioral response times did not distinguish groups nor did they associate with self-report data.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: BD and AD had additive, rather than interactive, effects on self-reported SR and SP. The methods employed, paired with their application to the present sample, may account for a lack of positive findings with behavioral data.
双相情感障碍(BD)和酒精依赖(AD)具有共享的神经行为特征,包括对奖励的高度敏感(SR),这可能是 BD 和 AD 共病(BD + AD)发生率高的原因。然而,实证研究还很缺乏。本多方法研究使用可靠且经过充分验证的 SR 和 SP 自我报告问卷,以及专门设计用于区分 SR 和 SP 激活的实验室任务,对这些患者群体的 SR 和 SP 进行了研究。
100 名参与者分为 4 组:BD + AD(n = 40)、BD(n = 18)、AD(n = 25)和健康对照组(n = 17)。进行了临床访谈,参与者完成了惩罚敏感性和奖励敏感性问卷(SPSR-Q)和点数反应测试行为任务。进行了 Pearson 相关、分层线性回归以及具有 Bonferroni 校正的 2 × 2 因子通用线性建模和两两比较。
BD 和 AD 对自我报告的 SR 和 SP 有显著的主效应;然而,BD × AD 交互作用不显著。BD + AD 个体在自我报告的 SR 上显著高于 BD 和 AD 个体,而所有临床组在 SP 上相似。行为反应时间无法区分组,也与自我报告数据无关。
讨论/结论:BD 和 AD 对自我报告的 SR 和 SP 有累加而非交互的影响。所采用的方法及其在本样本中的应用可能是行为数据没有阳性发现的原因。