Independent Consultant, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Center for Research On Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kusunti, Lalitpur, P.O. Box 9626, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Reprod Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01099-7.
Health service providers play a key role in addressing women's need for postpartum pregnancy prevention. Yet, in Nepal, little is known about providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) on providing postpartum family planning (PPFP), particularly the immediate postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD). This paper assesses providers KAP towards the provision of PPIUDs in Nepal prior to a PPIUD intervention to gain a baseline insight and analyzes whether their KAP changes both 6 and 24 months after the start of the intervention.
Data come from a randomized trial assessing the impact of a PPIUD intervention in Nepal between 2015 and 2017. We interviewed 96 providers working in six study hospitals who completed a baseline interview and follow-up interviews at 6 and 24 months. We used descriptive analysis, McNemar's test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess KAP of providers over 2 years.
The PPIUD KAP scores improved significantly between the baseline and 6-month follow-up. Knowledge scores increased from 2.9 out of 4 to 3.5, attitude scores increased from 4 out of 7 to 5.3, and practice scores increased from 0.9 out of 3 to 2.8. There was a significant increase in positive attitude and practice between 6 and 24 months. Knowledge on a women's chance of getting pregnant while using an IUD was poor. Attitudes on recommending a PPIUD to different women significantly improved, however, attitudes towards recommending a PPIUD to unmarried women and women who have had an ectopic pregnancy improved the least. Practice of PPIUD counseling and insertion improved significantly from baseline to 24 months, from 10.4 and 9.4% to 99% respectively.
Although KAP improved significantly among providers during the PPIUD intervention, providers' knowledge on a women's chance of getting pregnant while using an IUD and attitudes towards recommending a PPIUD to unmarried women and women who have had an ectopic pregnancy improved the least. Provider KAP could be improved further through ongoing and more in-depth training to maintain providers' knowledge, reduce provider bias and misconceptions about PPIUD eligibility, and to ensure providers understand the importance of birth spacing.
医疗服务提供者在满足妇女产后避孕需求方面发挥着关键作用。然而,在尼泊尔,人们对提供者在提供产后计划生育(PPFP)方面的知识、态度和实践(KAP)知之甚少,特别是对立即产后宫内节育器(PPIUD)知之甚少。本文评估了尼泊尔提供者在进行 PPIUD 干预之前对提供 PPIUD 的 KAP,以获得基线洞察力,并分析他们的 KAP 是否在干预开始后 6 个月和 24 个月发生变化。
数据来自于 2015 年至 2017 年期间在尼泊尔进行的一项 PPIUD 干预评估的随机试验。我们采访了在六家研究医院工作的 96 名提供者,他们在基线访谈和 6 个月和 24 个月的随访访谈中完成了访谈。我们使用描述性分析、McNemar 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验来评估 2 年内提供者的 KAP。
PPIUD 的 KAP 评分在基线和 6 个月随访之间显著提高。知识评分从 4 分中的 2.9 分提高到 3.5 分,态度评分从 7 分中的 4 分提高到 5.3 分,实践评分从 3 分中的 0.9 分提高到 2.8 分。6 个月和 24 个月之间,积极态度和实践有显著增加。关于使用宫内节育器的妇女怀孕机会的知识很差。对向不同妇女推荐 PPIUD 的态度有显著改善,然而,对向未婚妇女和异位妊娠妇女推荐 PPIUD 的态度改善最少。从基线到 24 个月,PPIUD 咨询和插入的实践显著改善,分别从 10.4%和 9.4%提高到 99%。
尽管在 PPIUD 干预期间提供者的 KAP 显著提高,但提供者对使用宫内节育器的妇女怀孕机会的知识以及对向未婚妇女和异位妊娠妇女推荐 PPIUD 的态度改善最少。通过持续和更深入的培训,可以进一步提高提供者的 KAP,以保持提供者的知识,减少提供者对 PPIUD 资格的偏见和误解,并确保提供者理解生育间隔的重要性。