Ho Cheng-Maw, Lee Chih-Hsin, Lee Ming-Chia, Zhang Jun-Fu, Chen Chin-Hua, Wang Jann-Yuan, Hu Rey-Heng, Lee Po-Huang
Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Pulmonary Medicine and Pulmonary Research Center, Wanfang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Front Oncol. 2021 Jan 28;10:616094. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.616094. eCollection 2020.
Survival after post-transplant recurrence of HCC is dismal, and almost all treatments for recurrent HCC are off-labeled, without an extensive large-scale analysis. We aimed to delineate their post-recurrence courses and define benchmarks for comparing future treatment effectiveness.
Three national databases, including health insurance, catastrophic illness, and the cause of death, were linked for cohort establishment and data collection during the period from 2005 to 2016. Patients with HCC recurrence ≥6 months after transplant surgery and under treatment were recruited for survival analysis. Selection of treatment strategies for HCC recurrence after liver transplant was based on the same criteria for those without liver transplant.
Of 2,123 liver transplant recipients, 349 developed HCC recurrence ≥6 months after liver transplant, and the median recurrence time was 17.8 months post-transplant. Within 2 years of treatment, 61% patients showed recurrence (early recurrence group), and survival in these patients was poorer than in the late recurrence group. According to a multivariable analysis, the transplant era before 2008 and radiofrequency ablation were associated with good prognosis, whereas receiving sorafenib and radiotherapy was associated with poor prognosis. The effect of transplant era became insignificant after stratification by recently receiving pretransplant transarterial chemoembolization.
Timing of recurrence and interventions used were associated with the outcomes of patients with post-transplant HCC recurrence. These data provide the benchmark and indicate the critical period and high-risk factors for further therapeutic trial consideration.
肝癌移植后复发后的生存率很低,几乎所有复发性肝癌的治疗都是超说明书用药,且缺乏广泛的大规模分析。我们旨在描绘其复发后的病程,并确定用于比较未来治疗效果的基准。
将包括健康保险、重大疾病和死亡原因在内的三个国家数据库进行关联,以建立队列并在2005年至2016年期间收集数据。招募移植手术后≥6个月出现肝癌复发且正在接受治疗的患者进行生存分析。肝移植后肝癌复发的治疗策略选择基于与非肝移植患者相同的标准。
在2123例肝移植受者中,349例在肝移植后≥6个月出现肝癌复发,复发的中位时间为移植后17.8个月。在治疗的2年内,61%的患者出现复发(早期复发组),这些患者的生存率低于晚期复发组。根据多变量分析,2008年前的移植时代和射频消融与良好预后相关,而接受索拉非尼和放疗与不良预后相关。在按最近接受移植前经动脉化疗栓塞分层后,移植时代的影响变得不显著。
复发时间和所采用的干预措施与移植后肝癌复发患者的预后相关。这些数据提供了基准,并指出了进一步治疗试验考虑的关键时期和高危因素。