Abdelrahim Maen, Mejia Alejandro, Esmail Abdullah, Barrera Gutierrez Juan Carlos, Ouf Mahmoud, Franses Joseph W, Bhan Irun, Kodali Sudha, Saharia Ashish, Mahipal Amit, Naleid Nikolas, Bridges Catherine, Tin Antony, Brewer Chris M, Aushev Vasily N, Fungtammasan Arkarachai, Palsuledesai Charuta C, Ortiz J Bryce, Jurdi Adham, Liu Minetta C, Ghobrial R Mark, He Aiwu Ruth
Section of GI Oncology, Houston Methodist Neal Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jul;9:e2400934. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00934. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has high relapse rates after standard-of-care (SOC) resection or liver transplantation (LT). We evaluated the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict relapse/progression risk in patients with HCC.
This retrospective analysis examined real-world data from ctDNA testing on 125 patients with HCC (721 plasma samples) undergoing curative-intent treatments and SOC management. Patients were divided into four subcohorts: cohort A (n = 64) and B (n = 52) comprised patients under recurrence monitoring after LT or resection, respectively. Cohort C (n = 4) and D (n = 5) comprised patients under treatment response monitoring with known recurrence or inoperable disease, respectively. A personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex polymerase chain reaction next-generation sequencing assay (Signatera, Natera, Inc, Austin, TX) was used for ctDNA testing. The molecular residual disease (MRD) window was defined as 2-12 weeks post-LT/resection (cohorts A/B), before starting adjuvant therapy (AT). Surveillance window was defined as post-MRD window or 2 weeks post-AT (cohort B) or during ongoing treatment (cohorts C/D).
The median follow-up was 40 (1.5-60) months. In cohort A, 97.2% (35/36) of patients with ctDNA negativity in the MRD window remained negative during surveillance. In cohort B, ctDNA was detected in 29.4% (10/34) of patients within the MRD window, all of whom experienced clinical recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 7.2 [95% CI, 2.6 to 20]; < .0001). In the surveillance window (cohort B), the ctDNA detection rate was 32.3% (10/31), and all experienced recurrence (HR, 18.0 [95% CI, 3.9 to 85]; < .0001). In cohorts C/D, on-treatment ctDNA dynamics were concordant with treatment response as measured by imaging. Compared with alpha-fetoprotein, ctDNA had higher sensitivity and a significantly longer lead time (7.9 2.2 months) for recurrence detection.
Serial ctDNA testing effectively identified HCC recurrence early, postresection and post-LT. ctDNA was also useful for treatment response monitoring and could help resolve ambiguous imaging results.
肝细胞癌(HCC)在接受标准治疗(SOC)切除或肝移植(LT)后复发率很高。我们评估了循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)在预测HCC患者复发/进展风险方面的效用。
这项回顾性分析检查了125例接受根治性治疗和SOC管理的HCC患者(721份血浆样本)的ctDNA检测真实世界数据。患者分为四个亚组:A组(n = 64)和B组(n = 52)分别包括LT或切除术后接受复发监测的患者。C组(n = 4)和D组(n = 5)分别包括已知复发或不可切除疾病的治疗反应监测患者。使用个性化的、肿瘤信息指导的16重聚合酶链反应下一代测序分析(Signatera,Natera公司,奥斯汀,德克萨斯州)进行ctDNA检测。分子残留病(MRD)窗口定义为LT/切除术后(A/B组)2 - 12周,即开始辅助治疗(AT)之前。监测窗口定义为MRD窗口之后或AT后2周(B组)或正在治疗期间(C/D组)。
中位随访时间为40(1.5 - 60)个月。在A组中,MRD窗口中ctDNA阴性的患者97.2%(35/36)在监测期间仍为阴性。在B组中,MRD窗口内29.4%(10/34)的患者检测到ctDNA,所有这些患者均经历了临床复发(风险比[HR],7.2[95%CI,2.6至20];P <.0001)。在监测窗口(B组)中,ctDNA检测率为32.3%(10/31),所有患者均复发(HR,18.0[95%CI,3.9至85];P <.0001)。在C/D组中,治疗期间ctDNA动态与影像学测量的治疗反应一致。与甲胎蛋白相比,ctDNA对复发检测具有更高的敏感性和显著更长的提前期(7.9±2.2个月)。
连续ctDNA检测有效地在切除术后和LT后早期识别HCC复发。ctDNA也有助于治疗反应监测,并有助于解决模糊的影像学结果。