Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jan-Feb;36(1):47-54. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7965.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior regarding dynamic fatigue of different implant-abutment connections and the unitary indication of abutments for all regions of the mouth.
This experimental study developed according to international standards (ISO 14801:2007) was performed using five types of implants and abutments: G1-external hex smart implant and 17-degree universal abutment (EHS); G2-cortical external hex implant and 17-degree universal abutment (EHTi); G3-internal hex implant and 30-degree universal abutment (IH); G4-Morse taper implant (11.5 degrees) and 17-degree universal abutment (MT11.5); and G5- Morse taper implant (16 degrees) and 30-degree universal abutment (MT16). A 15-Hz cyclic loading was applied to the specimens with the maximum number of cycles set at 5 × 10. Success was defined when three samples supported 5 million cycles without failure. The maximum load supported from each group after dynamic loading was recorded. The Spearman correlation and the Lowess method were used to analyze the correlation between the number of cycles and the applied load, and the Kruskal-Wallis and Nemenyi tests were used for comparison between the abutments when reaching 5 million cycles.
There was a negative correlation (r < 0.00) and significant difference (P < .05) between the number of cycles and the load for each type of implant and abutment. The load values supported by each group after cyclic loading to achieve 5 million cycles were as follows: EHS, 225 N; EHTi, 215 N; IH, 220 N; MT11.5, 210 N; and MT16, 240 N. The MT16 implant-abutment assembly presented a significantly higher load (P = .024) than the MT11.5 implant-abutment assembly.
All implant-abutment connections investigated in this study resisted average occlusal force values reported as acceptable in the literature and may be indicated for any region of the mouth.
本体外研究旨在评估不同种植体-基台连接的动态疲劳力学性能,并为口腔的所有区域提供通用的基台适应证。
本实验研究根据国际标准(ISO 14801:2007)进行,使用五种类型的种植体和基台:G1-外部六角智能种植体和 17 度通用基台(EHS);G2-皮质外六角种植体和 17 度通用基台(EHTi);G3-内部六角种植体和 30 度通用基台(IH);G4-Morse 锥度种植体(11.5 度)和 17 度通用基台(MT11.5);G5-Morse 锥度种植体(16 度)和 30 度通用基台(MT16)。对试件施加 15Hz 的循环载荷,最大循环次数设定为 5×10。当三个样本在不失效的情况下支撑 500 万次循环时,定义为成功。记录每组在动态加载后的最大承载负荷。采用 Spearman 相关和 Lowess 方法分析循环次数与施加负荷之间的相关性,采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Nemenyi 检验比较达到 500 万次循环时各基台之间的差异。
每种种植体-基台类型的循环次数与负荷之间均呈负相关(r<0.00),且差异有统计学意义(P<.05)。每组在达到 500 万次循环后的循环加载后的承载负荷值如下:EHS,225N;EHTi,215N;IH,220N;MT11.5,210N;MT16,240N。MT16 种植体-基台组件的负荷明显高于 MT11.5 种植体-基台组件(P=0.024)。
本研究中所有的种植体-基台连接均能抵抗文献报道的可接受的平均咬合力量值,可用于口腔的任何区域。