Tolesano Loureiro Karine Regina, Boaventura de Moura Marcos, de Oliveira Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes, Resende Novais Veridiana, Zancopé Karla, Simamoto Júnior Paulo Cézar
Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia 38405-320, MG, Brazil.
Independent Researcher, Curitiba 80820-520, PR, Brazil.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 16;11(12):1775. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121775.
The objective of this study is to examine the mechanical behavior of two-piece abutments (Morse taper with 16° internal angulation and Morse taper with 11.5° internal angulation) before and after cyclic fatigue testing, following ISO 14801:2016 guidelines. The specimens were divided into three groups: a modified Morse taper with a taper angle of 16° (GM group), a conventional Morse taper (taper angle of 11.5° deg) with a two-piece (CMt group), and one-piece abutments (CMo group). Each experimental group was formed by ten implants and ten abutments ( = 10) for a total of 30 specimens ( = 30). The abutments were tightened and loosened, and a fatigue test was applied with 15 Hz and 5 × 10 cycles. Subsequently, the abutments were loosened, and a pull-out test was performed on the CMt group. Finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted on stress concentration regions. The statistical analysis of the loosening test was performed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests ( < 0.05) to compare screw loosening within each group and between the groups with and without mechanical fatigue. Significant differences were found among the three groups in the loosening test when analyzing the values with and without fatigue ( < 0.001) within each group. When the groups were compared with each other, there was also a significant difference between them ( < 0.001), except between groups GM and CMt without fatigue ( = 0.840). In the pull-out test of the CMt group, the sample exhibited frictional locking only after fatigue (mean = 94.2 N). The FEA demonstrated a varied stress distribution in all groups. The stress was found to be more concentrated in the upper third and middle third regions of the implant, as well as in the opposite region of the load application for all three groups. Although the CMo group showed lower rates of loosening, it displayed a poorer stress distribution in comparison to the GM and CMt groups. On the other hand, the CMt group exhibited a satisfactory frictional lock after undergoing the fatigue tests.
本研究的目的是按照ISO 14801:2016指南,检测两件式基台(内锥角为16°的莫氏锥度和内锥角为11.5°的莫氏锥度)在循环疲劳测试前后的力学行为。将标本分为三组:锥角为16°的改良莫氏锥度(GM组)、两件式传统莫氏锥度(锥角为11.5°)(CMt组)和一体式基台(CMo组)。每个实验组由10个种植体和10个基台组成(n = 10),总共30个标本(n = 30)。对基台进行拧紧和松开操作,并以15 Hz和5×10⁶ 次循环进行疲劳测试。随后,松开基台,并对CMt组进行拔出测试。对应力集中区域进行有限元分析(FEA)。使用双向方差分析和Tukey检验(p < 0.05)对松动测试进行统计分析,以比较每组内以及有和没有机械疲劳的组之间的螺钉松动情况。在分析每组有和没有疲劳情况下的值时,三组在松动测试中存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。当组间相互比较时,除了GM组和无疲劳的CMt组之间(p = 0.840),它们之间也存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。在CMt组的拔出测试中,样本仅在疲劳后表现出摩擦锁定(平均值 = 94.2 N)。有限元分析表明所有组的应力分布各不相同。发现所有三组的应力在种植体的上三分之一和中三分之一区域以及加载的相反区域更为集中。尽管CMo组的松动率较低,但与GM组和CMt组相比,其应力分布较差。另一方面,CMt组在经过疲劳测试后表现出令人满意的摩擦锁定。