• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较儿科肿瘤患者的营养不良和营养不良筛查工具:一项横断面研究。

Comparison of malnutrition and malnutrition screening tools in pediatric oncology patients: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Izmir, Turkey.

Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Nutrition. 2021 Jun;86:111142. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111142. Epub 2021 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2021.111142
PMID:33601119
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of malnutrition, to compare nutritional evaluation tools, and to highlight the importance of nutritional status in pediatric oncology patients.

METHODS

This study evaluated the nutritional status, based on height, weight, and midupper arm circumference, of 170 patients ages 5 months to 18 years who were hospitalized at the Ege University Hospital Pediatric Oncology Clinic. The prevalence of malnutrition was determined using the malnutrition screening tools, STRONGkids (SK) and Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score (PYMS). Correlations, sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values between the screening tools were calculated.

RESULTS

In all, 68.2% of the patients were diagnosed with a solid tumor. According to SK, 59.4% had a moderate risk of malnutrition, and 40.6% had a high risk. According to PYMS, 30.6% of patients had a low to moderate risk of malnutrition, and 69.4% had a high risk of malnutrition. Minimal agreement was noted between SK and PYMS (Kappa value: 0.40 and 0.18, respectively). The sensitivity of PYMS was higher than that of SK (92.68 and 78.05, respectively). In total, 22.9% of the patients had a body mass index of <5%, and 21.2% had a midupper arm circumference of <5.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings show that, in general, pediatric oncology patients have a high risk of malnutrition. Although SK and PYMS do not differ significantly, PYMS has higher sensitivity for detecting malnutrition. The nutritional status of pediatric oncology patients should be monitored using appropriate screening techniques throughout their treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定营养不良的患病率,比较营养评估工具,并强调儿科肿瘤患者营养状况的重要性。

方法

本研究通过身高、体重和上臂中部周径评估了在伊兹密尔大学医院儿科肿瘤科住院的 170 名 5 个月至 18 岁的患者的营养状况。使用营养不良筛查工具 STRONGkids(SK)和儿科约克希尔营养不良评分(PYMS)确定营养不良的患病率。计算了筛查工具之间的相关性、敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

所有患者中,68.2%的患者被诊断为实体瘤。根据 SK,59.4%的患者有中度营养不良风险,40.6%的患者有高度营养不良风险。根据 PYMS,30.6%的患者有低中度营养不良风险,69.4%的患者有高度营养不良风险。SK 和 PYMS 之间的一致性较低(Kappa 值分别为 0.40 和 0.18)。PYMS 的敏感性高于 SK(分别为 92.68%和 78.05%)。总的来说,22.9%的患者 BMI<5%,21.2%的患者上臂中部周径<5。

结论

本研究结果表明,一般来说,儿科肿瘤患者有很高的营养不良风险。尽管 SK 和 PYMS 没有显著差异,但 PYMS 检测营养不良的敏感性更高。应使用适当的筛查技术监测儿科肿瘤患者的营养状况,贯穿整个治疗过程。

相似文献

1
Comparison of malnutrition and malnutrition screening tools in pediatric oncology patients: A cross-sectional study.比较儿科肿瘤患者的营养不良和营养不良筛查工具:一项横断面研究。
Nutrition. 2021 Jun;86:111142. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111142. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
2
Evaluation of malnutrition development risk in hospitalized children.评估住院儿童的营养不良发展风险。
Nutrition. 2018 Apr;48:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
3
Malnutrition risk in hospitalized children: use of 3 screening tools in a large European population.住院儿童营养不良风险:在欧洲大人群中使用 3 种筛查工具。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 May;103(5):1301-10. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.110700. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
4
Comparison of three different nutrition screening tools for pediatric inpatients.三种不同的儿科住院患者营养筛查工具的比较。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2022 Jun;37(3):698-704. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10828. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
5
Clinical significance of nutritional risk screening tool for hospitalised children with acute burn injuries: a cross-sectional study.营养风险筛查工具在急性烧伤住院患儿中的临床意义:一项横断面研究。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018 Jun;31(3):370-378. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12518. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
6
The Pediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score Is a Reliable Malnutrition Screening Tool.小儿约克希尔营养不良评分是一种可靠的营养不良筛查工具。
Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2017;40(sup1):62-68. doi: 10.1080/24694193.2017.1386972.
7
Malnutrition in Hospitalised Children-An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Two Nutritional Screening Tools.住院儿童营养不良-两种营养筛查工具疗效评价。
Nutrients. 2021 Apr 13;13(4):1279. doi: 10.3390/nu13041279.
8
The malnutrition screening tool STRONGKIDS performed better than other screening tools for children hospitalised in Egypt.STRONGKIDS 营养不良筛查工具在埃及住院儿童中的表现优于其他筛查工具。
Acta Paediatr. 2024 May;113(5):1006-1012. doi: 10.1111/apa.17123. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
9
Evaluation of malnutrition and screening tools in hospitalized children.住院儿童的营养评估和筛查工具。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023 Oct;57:770-778. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.08.031. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
10
A four-stage evaluation of the Paediatric Yorkhill Malnutrition Score in a tertiary paediatric hospital and a district general hospital.儿科约克希尔营养不良评分在一家三级儿科医院和一家地区综合医院的四阶段评估。
Br J Nutr. 2010 Sep;104(5):751-6. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510001121. Epub 2010 Apr 19.