National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Dept Environmental Medicine and Behavioral Science, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Apr;233:113709. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113709. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
Epidemiological and experimental studies have revealed the effects of the room temperature, indoor air humidity, and ventilation on human health, work and cognitive performance, and risk of infection. In this overview, we integrate the influence of these important microclimatic parameters and assess their influence in offices based on literature searches. The dose-effect curves of the temperature describe a concave shape. Low temperature increases the risk of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and elevated temperature increases the risk of acute non-specific symptoms, e.g., dry eyes, and respiratory symptoms. Cognitive and work performance is optimal between 22 °C and 24 °C for regions with temperate or cold climate, but both higher and lower temperatures may deteriorate the performances and learning efficiency. Low temperature may favor virus viability, however, depending on the status of the physiological tissue in the airways. Low indoor air humidity causes vulnerable eyes and airways from desiccation and less efficient mucociliary clearance. This causes elevation of the most common mucous membrane-related symptoms, like dry and tired eyes, which deteriorates the work performance. Epidemiological, experimental, and clinical studies support that intervention of dry indoor air conditions by humidification alleviates symptoms of dry eyes and airways, fatigue symptoms, less complaints about perceived dry air, and less compromised work performance. Intervention of dry air conditions by elevation of the indoor air humidity may be a non-pharmaceutical treatment of the risk of infection by reduced viability and transport of influenza virus. Relative humidity between 40 and 60% appears optimal for health, work performance, and lower risk of infection. Ventilation can reduce both acute and chronic health outcomes and improve work performance, because the exposure is reduced by the dilution of the indoor air pollutants (including pathogens, e.g., as virus droplets), and in addition to general emission source control strategies. Personal control of ventilation appears an important factor that influences the satisfaction of the thermal comfort due to its physical and positive psychological impact. However, natural ventilation or mechanical ventilation can become sources of air pollutants, allergens, and pathogens of outdoor or indoor origin and cause an increase in exposure. The "health-based ventilation rate" in a building should meet WHO's air quality guidelines and dilute human bio-effluent emissions to reach an acceptable perceived indoor air quality. Ventilation is a modifying factor that should be integrated with both the indoor air humidity and the room temperature in a strategic joint control to satisfy the perceived indoor air quality, health, working performance, and minimize the risk of infection.
流行病学和实验研究揭示了室温、室内空气湿度和通风对人体健康、工作和认知表现以及感染风险的影响。在这篇综述中,我们整合了这些重要的小气候参数的影响,并根据文献检索评估了它们在办公室中的影响。温度的剂量-效应曲线呈凹形。低温会增加心血管和呼吸道疾病的风险,高温会增加急性非特异性症状(如干眼症和呼吸道症状)的风险。对于温带或寒冷气候地区,22°C 到 24°C 之间的认知和工作表现最佳,但较高和较低的温度都可能降低表现和学习效率。低温可能有利于病毒的生存能力,但这取决于呼吸道生理组织的状态。低室内空气湿度会使眼睛和气道干燥脱水,黏液纤毛清除效率降低。这会导致最常见的黏膜相关症状(如干眼症和疲劳)加重,从而降低工作表现。流行病学、实验和临床研究支持通过加湿干预干燥的室内空气条件可以缓解干眼症和呼吸道症状、疲劳症状、减少对干燥空气的抱怨以及降低工作表现受损。通过提高室内空气湿度来干预干燥空气条件可能是降低流感病毒生存能力和传播风险的非药物治疗方法。相对湿度在 40%到 60%之间似乎对健康、工作表现和降低感染风险最为理想。通风可以降低急性和慢性健康结果,并改善工作表现,因为通风可以通过稀释室内空气污染物(包括病原体,例如病毒飞沫)来减少暴露,并且除了一般的排放源控制策略之外。个人控制通风似乎是一个重要因素,它会影响对热舒适度的满意度,因为它具有物理和积极的心理影响。然而,自然通风或机械通风可能成为室外或室内来源的空气污染物、过敏原和病原体的来源,并导致暴露增加。建筑物中的“基于健康的通风率”应符合世界卫生组织的空气质量指南,并稀释人体生物排放物,以达到可接受的感知室内空气质量。通风是一个调节因素,应与室内空气湿度和室温相结合,进行战略性联合控制,以满足感知室内空气质量、健康、工作表现,并最大限度地降低感染风险。