Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:1226-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
To investigate the impact of the SAR-Cov-2 pandemic and lockdown on individuals with bipolar disorder in comparison to healthy controls.
A longitudinal study of 560 participants including 147 healthy controls was conducted between April 30 and May 30, 2020 during a state-wide lockdown. Bi-weekly measures included the Coronavirus Impact Scale, the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index, the Patient Health Questionnaire, 9-item, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale, 7-item. Generalized estimating equations method was used to examine the longitudinal change of the measures within the lockdown and the change from pre-pandemic period to pandemic period.
All participants reported an impact of lockdown. Individuals with bipolar disorder reported greater impact from the stay-at-home orders with disruptions in routines, income/employment, social support and pandemic related stress. While these measures improved over time, healthy controls recovered quicker and with greater magnitude than persons with bipolar disorder. Comparing mood symptom severity measures in mid-March through May 2020 to the same time window in 2015-2019 (pre- verses post-pandemic), there were no significant differences among individuals with bipolar disorder, whereas healthy controls showed a significant, albeit transient, increase in mood symptoms.
Everyone was impacted by the SARs-CoV pandemic; however, those with bipolar disorder experienced more life impacting changes from the stay-at-home orders vs healthy controls. These disruptions improved over time but much more slowly than healthy controls. Pre- vs post-pandemic comparisons show a modest but significant increase in mood severity in the healthy controls which was not observed in those with bipolar disorder.
与健康对照组相比,调查 SARS-CoV-2 大流行和封锁对双相情感障碍患者的影响。
这是一项在 2020 年 4 月 30 日至 5 月 30 日期间进行的针对 560 名参与者(包括 147 名健康对照者)的纵向研究,研究期间实行全州封锁。双周评估包括冠状病毒影响量表、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数、患者健康问卷 9 项、广义焦虑障碍量表 7 项。采用广义估计方程方法来检查封锁期间这些措施的纵向变化以及从大流行前到大流行期间的变化。
所有参与者均报告了封锁的影响。双相情感障碍患者报告称,在家令令、日常生活规律、收入/就业、社会支持和与大流行相关的压力方面受到了更大的影响。尽管这些措施随着时间的推移而有所改善,但健康对照组的恢复速度比双相情感障碍患者更快,幅度更大。将 2020 年 3 月中旬至 5 月期间的情绪症状严重程度与 2015-2019 年同期(大流行前与大流行后)进行比较,双相情感障碍患者之间没有显著差异,而健康对照组则表现出情绪症状的显著但短暂增加。
每个人都受到 SARS-CoV 大流行的影响;然而,与健康对照组相比,那些患有双相情感障碍的患者在家令令方面经历了更多对生活产生影响的变化。这些干扰随着时间的推移而改善,但速度比健康对照组慢得多。与大流行前相比,大流行后健康对照组的情绪严重程度略有但显著增加,而双相情感障碍患者则没有观察到这种情况。