Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Institute of Behavioral Science; The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry Research; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Glen Oaks, New York.
Pediatric Mental Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Program, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:876-884. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.162. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with emotion interpretation biases that can exacerbate depressed mood. Interpretation bias training (IBT) may help; according to the "virtuous cycle" hypothesis, interpreting others' emotions as positive can lead to interactions that improve mood. Our goals were to determine whether IBT can shift emotion interpretation biases and demonstrate clinical benefits (lower depressed mood, improved social function) in people with BD.
Young adults with BD were recruited for three sessions of computer-based IBT. Active IBT targets negative emotion bias by training judgments of ambiguous face emotions towards happy judgments. Participants were randomized to active or sham IBT. Participants reported on mood and functioning at baseline, intervention end (week two), and week 10.
Fifty participants (average age 22, 72% female) enrolled, 38 completed the week 10 follow-up. IBT shifted emotion interpretations (Hedges g = 1.63). There was a group-by-time effect (B = -13.88, p < .0001) on self-reported depression; the IBT group had a larger decrease in depressed mood. The IBT group also had a larger increase in perceived familial support (B = 3.88, p < .0001). Baseline learning rate (i.e., how quickly emotion judgments were updated) was associated with reduced clinician- (B = -54.70, p < 0.001) and self-reported depression (B = -58.20, p = 0.009).
Our results converge with prior work demonstrating that IBT may reduce depressed mood. Additionally, our results provide support for role of operant conditioning in the treatment of depression. People with BD spend more time depressed than manic; IBT, an easily disseminated intervention, could augment traditional forms of treatment without significant expense or side effects.
双相情感障碍(BD)与情绪解释偏差有关,这种偏差可能会加重抑郁情绪。解释偏差训练(IBT)可能会有所帮助;根据“良性循环”假说,将他人的情绪解释为积极情绪可以促进改善情绪的互动。我们的目标是确定 IBT 是否可以改变情绪解释偏差,并在 BD 患者中证明其具有临床益处(降低抑郁情绪,改善社会功能)。
招募了患有 BD 的年轻成年人参加三次基于计算机的 IBT。主动 IBT 通过训练对模棱两可的面部表情的判断来针对负面情绪偏见,将判断向快乐判断倾斜。参与者被随机分配到主动或假 IBT。参与者在基线、干预结束(第 2 周)和第 10 周报告情绪和功能。
共有 50 名参与者(平均年龄 22 岁,72%为女性)入组,38 名完成了第 10 周的随访。IBT 改变了情绪解释(Hedges g=1.63)。存在组间-时间效应(B=-13.88,p<0.0001),自我报告的抑郁症状减轻;IBT 组的抑郁情绪下降幅度更大。IBT 组还感受到了更多的家庭支持(B=3.88,p<0.0001)。基线学习率(即情绪判断更新的速度)与临床医生评估的抑郁症状减轻(B=-54.70,p<0.001)和自我报告的抑郁症状减轻(B=-58.20,p=0.009)相关。
我们的结果与先前的研究结果一致,表明 IBT 可能会降低抑郁情绪。此外,我们的研究结果为操作性条件作用在抑郁症治疗中的作用提供了支持。BD 患者处于抑郁状态的时间多于躁狂状态;IBT 作为一种易于传播的干预措施,在不增加显著费用或副作用的情况下,可以增强传统的治疗形式。