Department of Orthopaedic surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Hip Int. 2022 Sep;32(5):672-676. doi: 10.1177/1120700021991452. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Osteotomy of the greater trochanter is a commonly used procedure in complex revision hip arthroplasty in order to achieve a wide exposure to the femoral stem and acetabular components. There is no clinical evidence in favour of a specific fixation method. The aim of this study was to compare cable-plate with figure-of-eight cerclage wire fixation in patients requiring a trochanteric "slide" osteotomy.
In a retrospective study, 51 greater trochanteric "slide" osteotomies in complex acetabular revision arthroplasties were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 28 hips were fixed with 1 of 2 cable-plate systems (Dall-Miles staple, Stryker or Cable-Ready plate, Zimmer) and 23 with a figure-of-eight cerclage wire.Consolidation, osteolysis, migration of greater trochanter, bursitis of the trochanteric area, Trendelenburg gait and removal of osteosynthesis material were studied at 6 months follow-up.
Both groups showed good union rates. The lysis rate was similar with 32% in the cable-plate group versus 29% in the cerclage wire group ( = 0.084). 43% of the hips with cable-plate and 22% of the cerclage wire had trochanteric migration ( = 0.297). Pain at the greater trochanter was less frequent in the cerclage wire group (9%) as compared to the cable-plate group (43%) ( = 0.007). Implant removal was more frequent in the cable-plate group (4 vs. 0 patients). Trendelenburg gait was found in 3 patients in the cerclage wire group as compared to 10 in the cable-plate group ( = 0.054).
The cerclage wiring had superior clinical outcomes with similar radiographic results. The authors recommend the use of figure-of-eight cerclage wire when fixing a greater trochanteric "slide" osteotomy in complex revision hip arthroplasty.
在复杂的髋关节翻修手术中,为了获得股骨柄和髋臼组件的广泛暴露,常采用股骨大转子截骨术。目前,尚无临床证据支持特定的固定方法。本研究旨在比较电缆钢板与八字形环扎钢丝固定在需要大转子“滑动”截骨的患者中的效果。
本回顾性研究纳入了 51 例复杂髋臼翻修全髋关节置换术中的大转子“滑动”截骨术。患者分为 2 组:28 髋采用 2 种电缆钢板系统(Dall-Miles 钉、Stryker 或 Cable-Ready 钢板、Zimmer)中的 1 种固定,23 髋采用八字形环扎钢丝固定。术后 6 个月随访时,研究了两组的固定牢固性、骨质溶解、大转子迁移、大转子区滑囊炎、Trendelenburg 步态和内固定材料取出情况。
两组的愈合率均较高。电缆钢板组的骨溶解率为 32%,与环扎钢丝组的 29%相似( = 0.084)。电缆钢板组有 43%的髋关节出现大转子迁移,而环扎钢丝组有 22%( = 0.297)。与电缆钢板组(43%)相比,环扎钢丝组的大转子疼痛发生率较低(9%)( = 0.007)。电缆钢板组的内固定取出率较高(4 例与 0 例)。在环扎钢丝组中有 3 例出现 Trendelenburg 步态,而在电缆钢板组中有 10 例( = 0.054)。
环扎钢丝固定具有更好的临床效果,且影像学结果相似。作者建议在复杂髋关节翻修术中固定大转子“滑动”截骨时使用八字形环扎钢丝。