Department of Speech-language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:2331216520984700. doi: 10.1177/2331216520984700.
Technology options for children with limited hearing unilaterally that improve the signal-to-noise ratio are expected to improve speech recognition and also reduce listening effort in challenging listening situations, although previous studies have not confirmed this. Employing behavioral and subjective indices of listening effort, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of two intervention options, remote microphone system (RMS) and contralateral routing of signal (CROS) system, in school-aged children with limited hearing unilaterally. Nineteen children (aged 7-12 years) with limited hearing unilaterally completed a digit triplet recognition task in three loudspeaker conditions: midline, monaural direct, and monaural indirect with three intervention options: unaided, RMS, and CROS system. Verbal response times were interpreted as a behavioral measure of listening effort. Participants provided subjective ratings immediately following behavioral measures. The RMS significantly improved digit triplet recognition across loudspeaker conditions and reduced verbal response times in the midline and indirect conditions. The CROS system improved speech recognition and listening effort only in the indirect condition. Subjective ratings analyses revealed that significantly more participants indicated that the remote microphone made it easier for them to listen and to stay motivated. Behavioral and subjective indices of listening effort indicated that an RMS provided the most consistent benefit for speech recognition and listening effort for children with limited unilateral hearing. RMSs could therefore be a beneficial technology option in classrooms for children with limited hearing unilaterally.
预计改善单侧听力有限儿童信号噪声比的技术选择将提高言语识别能力,并降低在具有挑战性的聆听环境中的聆听努力度,尽管先前的研究并未证实这一点。本研究采用行为和聆听努力的主观指标,旨在评估两种干预选择(远程麦克风系统(RMS)和信号对侧路由(CROS)系统)对单侧听力有限的学龄儿童的影响。19 名单侧听力有限的儿童(7-12 岁)在三种扬声器条件下完成了三位数识别任务:中线、单耳直接和单耳间接,同时使用三种干预选择:未辅助、RMS 和 CROS 系统。言语反应时间被解释为聆听努力的行为衡量标准。参与者在完成行为测量后立即提供主观评分。RMS 显著改善了扬声器条件下的数字三胞胎识别,并减少了中线和间接条件下的言语反应时间。CROS 系统仅在间接条件下改善了语音识别和聆听努力度。主观评分分析显示,更多的参与者表示远程麦克风使他们更容易聆听并保持积极性。聆听努力的行为和主观指标表明,对于单侧听力有限的儿童,RMS 为语音识别和聆听努力提供了最一致的益处。因此,RMS 可以成为单侧听力有限的儿童教室中有益的技术选择。