Pinzón-Díaz María Camila, Martínez-Moreno Oswal, Castellanos-Gómez Natalia Marcela, Cardona-Posada Viviana, Florez-Montes Frank, Vallejo-Cardona Johnatan, Correa-Ortiz Luis Carlos
Faculty of Rehabilitation and Sports Sciences, Escuela Colombiana de Rehabilitación, Bogotá 110110, Colombia.
Faculty of Science and Engineering, Universidad de Manizales, Manizales 170001, Colombia.
Audiol Res. 2025 Jul 3;15(4):80. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15040080.
Traditionally, auditory rehabilitation in people with hearing loss has sought training in auditory skills to achieve an understanding of sound messages for communication. Assistive or supportive technology is limited to hearing aids that transmit sound through the air or bone to be used by the individual, and only in recent times have technologies for rehabilitation, of high cost and difficult access, begun to be used, employed by audiology professionals. The objective of this study was to compile the evidence reported in the literature on the use of technology in auditory rehabilitation for the improvement of hearing skills in people with hearing loss, beyond hearing aids and cochlear implants. A systematic review of the literature was conducted between 2018 and 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using as search terms Technology AND "Auditory Rehabilitation" validated in DeCS and MeSH thesauri; the PICO method was used to propose the research question, and the PRISMA strategy was used for the inclusion or exclusion of the articles to be reviewed. In the first search, 141 documents were obtained. Subsequently, inclusion criteria, such as development with vibrotactile stimulation, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), among others, and exclusion criteria, such as those related to cochlear implants and air conduction hearing aids, were applied, and finally, articles related to natural language processing, and other systematic reviews were excluded so that the database was reduced to 14 documents. To this set, due to their relevance, two papers were added, for a total of sixteen analyzed. There are solutions ranging from the use of smartphones for telehealth to solutions with multiple technologies, such as the development of virtual environments with vibrotactile feedback. Hearing-impaired people and even professionals in this area of healthcare have a high level of acceptance of the use of technology in rehabilitation. Finally, this article highlights the crucial role of technology in auditory rehabilitation, with solutions that improve hearing skills and the positive acceptance of these tools by patients and audiology professionals.
传统上,听力损失患者的听觉康复旨在通过听觉技能训练来理解声音信息以进行交流。辅助或支持技术仅限于通过空气或骨骼传输声音供个人使用的助听器,而且直到最近,由听力学专业人员使用的、成本高昂且难以获取的康复技术才开始得到应用。本研究的目的是汇总文献中报道的关于使用技术进行听觉康复以改善听力损失患者听力技能的证据,这些技术不限于助听器和人工耳蜗。2018年至2024年期间,在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中对文献进行了系统综述,使用在DeCS和MeSH词库中验证的“技术”和“听觉康复”作为检索词;采用PICO方法提出研究问题,并使用PRISMA策略来纳入或排除待审查的文章。在首次检索中,获得了141篇文献。随后,应用了纳入标准,如基于振动触觉刺激的开发、信息通信技术(ICT)等,以及排除标准,如与人工耳蜗和气导助听器相关的标准,最后,排除了与自然语言处理相关的文章以及其他系统综述,从而使数据库减少到14篇文献。由于相关性,又添加了两篇论文,总共分析了16篇。从用于远程医疗的智能手机到多种技术的解决方案,比如开发具有振动触觉反馈的虚拟环境,应有尽有。听力受损者乃至该医疗领域的专业人员对康复中使用技术的接受度都很高。最后,本文强调了技术在听觉康复中的关键作用,其解决方案可提高听力技能,并且患者和听力学专业人员对这些工具持积极接受态度。