Nelson R C, Chezmar J L, Steinberg H V, Torres W E, Baumgartner B R, Gedgaudas-McClees R K, Bernardino M E
Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Gastrointest Radiol. 1988;13(2):115-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01889039.
Eighteen patients with focal hepatic lesions were evaluated with two computed tomographic (CT) techniques including dynamic sequential bolus contrast CT and delayed contrast CT, and 3 magnetic resonance (MR) techniques including a spin echo pulse sequence with TE/TR of 21/310 msec and 2 fast field echo sequences using a TE/TR of 15/300 msec and 80 degrees flip angle (T1-weighted) and TE/TR of 15/500 msec and 10-20 degrees flip angle (T2-weighted). We concluded that CT, using delayed contrast and dynamic sequential bolus contrast techniques, was consistently superior to the 3 MR pulse sequences used on our imagers in terms of number of lesions detected, lesion-to-liver contrast, and quality of scan.
18例肝脏局灶性病变患者接受了两种计算机断层扫描(CT)技术评估,包括动态连续团注对比剂CT和延迟对比剂CT,以及3种磁共振(MR)技术评估,包括回波时间(TE)/重复时间(TR)为21/310毫秒的自旋回波脉冲序列,以及两种快速场回波序列,其TE/TR分别为15/300毫秒和80°翻转角(T1加权)以及15/500毫秒和10 - 20°翻转角(T2加权)。我们得出结论,就检测到的病变数量、病变与肝脏的对比度以及扫描质量而言,使用延迟对比剂和动态连续团注对比剂技术的CT始终优于我们成像仪上使用的3种MR脉冲序列。