Zhao Wancheng, Yang Qing
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Feb 9;13:1179-1186. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S292477. eCollection 2021.
To explore the relationship between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and cervical cancer lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) by comparing the prevalence of LVSI in cervical cancer patients who underwent LRH versus open radical hysterectomy (ORH).
The study participants were 1087 cervical cancer patients (FIGO 2009 stages IA2-IIA2) with pathologically confirmed with or without LVSI who underwent radical hysterectomy at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from 2013 through 2018. The patients were divided according to the type of surgical procedure into an LRH group (n=148) and an ORH group (n=939).
In the LRH group, 31.76% of patients (47/148) had LVSI-positive tumors compared to 33.23% of patients (312/939) in the ORH group; the difference was not significant (p=0.724). No between-group differences in LVSI prevalence according to lymph node metastasis, interstitial infiltration depth, differentiation degree, and parametrial infiltration were found. However, the number of LVSI-positive patients whose cervical cancer lesions >4 cm (stage I B2 and II A2) was significantly higher in the LRH group than in the ORH group (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.333, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.157-0.706, p=0.005). The 3-Year disease-free survival (DFS) in the LRH group is lower than that in the ORH group (94.75% vs 97.27%), but there was no significance (P=0.187). Furthermore, the percentage of LVSI-positive tumors in patients with lymph node metastases was significantly higher than those without lymph node metastases (OR 2.897, 95% CI 2.129-3.942, p=0.000). The 3-Year DFS were 98.22% in the LVSI negative patients and 93.78% in the LVSI positive patients, the difference was significant (P=0.002).
A higher risk of lymph node metastasis and a lower 3-Year DFS was found in the LVSI-positive patients. In case of LVSI, it would be dangerous to treat patient in laparoscopy, especially in case of cervical cancer lesions >4cm.
通过比较接受腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术(LRH)与开放性根治性子宫切除术(ORH)的宫颈癌患者中淋巴管间隙浸润(LVSI)的发生率,探讨LRH与宫颈癌LVSI之间的关系。
研究参与者为2013年至2018年在中国医科大学盛京医院接受根治性子宫切除术、病理确诊有无LVSI的1087例宫颈癌患者(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2009分期IA2-IIA2)。患者根据手术方式分为LRH组(n = 148)和ORH组(n = 939)。
LRH组中31.76%的患者(47/148)肿瘤LVSI阳性,而ORH组为33.23%的患者(312/939);差异无统计学意义(p = 0.724)。根据淋巴结转移、间质浸润深度、分化程度和宫旁浸润情况,两组间LVSI发生率无差异。然而,宫颈癌病灶>4 cm(IB2期和IIA2期)的LVSI阳性患者数量在LRH组显著高于ORH组(比值比[OR] 0.333,95%置信区间[CI] 0.157 - 0.706,p = 0.005)。LRH组的3年无病生存率(DFS)低于ORH组(94.75%对97.27%),但无统计学意义(P = 0.187)。此外,有淋巴结转移患者的LVSI阳性肿瘤百分比显著高于无淋巴结转移患者(OR 2.897,95% CI 2.129 - 3.942,p = 0.000)。LVSI阴性患者的3年DFS为98.22%,LVSI阳性患者为93.78%,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.002)。
LVSI阳性患者发生淋巴结转移的风险较高且3年DFS较低。对于LVSI患者,采用腹腔镜治疗存在风险,尤其是宫颈癌病灶>4 cm的情况。