• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠穿孔手术后伤口内持续负压及冲洗治疗的延迟一期缝合疗效

Efficacy of delayed primary closure with intrawound continuous negative pressure and irrigation treatment after surgery for colorectal perforation.

作者信息

Ogawa Katsuhiro, Nitta Hidetoshi, Masuda Toshiro, Matsumoto Katsutaka, Okino Tetsuya, Miyamoto Yuji, Baba Hideo, Takamori Hiroshi

机构信息

Division of Surgery Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Graduate School of Life Science Kumamoto University Kumamoto Japan.

出版信息

Acute Med Surg. 2021 Feb 9;8(1):e633. doi: 10.1002/ams2.633. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1002/ams2.633
PMID:33604056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7871202/
Abstract

AIM

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) often occur after surgery for colorectal perforation. We introduced delayed primary closure (DPC) after intrawound continuous negative pressure and irrigation treatment (IW-CONPIT) to prevent SSIs. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DPC after IW-CONPIT compared with primary closure (PC) after surgery for colorectal perforation.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective study including 22 patients who underwent DPC (DPC group) and 18 patients who underwent PC (PC group) at our hospital between April 2015 and January 2017. The primary outcome was the SSI rate. The secondary outcomes were other complications (<30 days), length of hospital stay, and costs.

RESULTS

The SSI rate was significantly lower in the DPC group than in the PC group (40% vs. 94%,  = 0.0006). Moreover, superficial and deep incisional SSIs, infectious complications, and Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥ 2 complications were also significantly diminished in the DPC group. Conversely, the length of hospital stay and costs were not significantly different between the two groups. Multivariate analyses revealed that the significant independent protective factor against SSI after surgery for colorectal perforation was DPC after IW-CONPIT (odds ratio 0.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.25).

CONCLUSION

Delayed primary closure after IW-CONPIT reduced SSIs after surgery for colorectal perforation compared with PC.

摘要

目的

结直肠穿孔手术后常发生手术部位感染(SSIs)。我们在伤口内持续负压和冲洗治疗(IW-CONPIT)后采用延迟一期缝合(DPC)来预防SSIs。我们旨在评估IW-CONPIT后DPC与结直肠穿孔手术后一期缝合(PC)相比的疗效。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了2015年4月至2017年1月期间在我院接受DPC的22例患者(DPC组)和接受PC的18例患者(PC组)。主要结局是SSI发生率。次要结局是其他并发症(<30天)、住院时间和费用。

结果

DPC组的SSI发生率显著低于PC组(40%对94%,P = 0.0006)。此外,DPC组的浅表和深部切口SSIs、感染性并发症以及Clavien-Dindo分类≥2级并发症也显著减少。相反,两组之间的住院时间和费用没有显著差异。多变量分析显示,结直肠穿孔手术后预防SSI的显著独立保护因素是IW-CONPIT后的DPC(优势比0.04;95%置信区间,0.002-0.25)。

结论

与PC相比,IW-CONPIT后的延迟一期缝合降低了结直肠穿孔手术后的SSIs。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be76/7871202/b7737f8d139e/AMS2-8-e633-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be76/7871202/b7737f8d139e/AMS2-8-e633-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be76/7871202/b7737f8d139e/AMS2-8-e633-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of delayed primary closure with intrawound continuous negative pressure and irrigation treatment after surgery for colorectal perforation.结直肠穿孔手术后伤口内持续负压及冲洗治疗的延迟一期缝合疗效
Acute Med Surg. 2021 Feb 9;8(1):e633. doi: 10.1002/ams2.633. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
The efficacy of intrawound vancomycin powder and povidone-iodine irrigation to prevent surgical site infections in complex instrumented spine surgery.局部应用万古霉素粉末和聚维酮碘冲洗预防复杂脊柱内固定术后手术部位感染的疗效。
Spine J. 2019 Oct;19(10):1648-1656. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.05.592. Epub 2019 May 31.
3
Management strategy for dirty abdominal incisions: primary or delayed primary closure? A randomized trial.脏污腹部切口的处理策略:一期缝合还是延迟一期缝合?一项随机试验。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009 Apr;10(2):129-36. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.030.
4
Delayed primary skin closure reduce surgical site infection following surgery for gastrointestinal perforation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.延迟一期缝合减少胃肠道穿孔术后手术部位感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Oct 4;409(1):298. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03489-4.
5
Comparison of Superficial Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Versus Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.复杂性阑尾炎中延期一期缝合与一期缝合切口浅层感染的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):631-637. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002464.
6
Primary versus delayed primary closure of laparotomy wounds in children following typhoid ileal perforation in Ile-Ife, Nigeria.尼日利亚伊费地区伤寒性回肠穿孔患儿剖腹手术伤口的一期缝合与延迟一期缝合对比研究
Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2017 Oct-Dec;14(4):70-73. doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_166_14.
7
A randomized trial analyzing the effects of primary versus delayed primary closure of incision on wound healing in patients with hollow viscus perforation.一项随机试验,分析一期缝合与延迟一期缝合切口对中空脏器穿孔患者伤口愈合的影响。
Turk J Surg. 2020 Dec 29;36(4):327-332. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2020.4882. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
Enhancing Healing Strategies: Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Delayed Primary Closure in Abdominal Wounds Post-emergency Laparotomy for Intestinal Perforation.增强愈合策略:负压伤口治疗与肠穿孔急诊剖腹术后腹部伤口的二期缝合延迟闭合
Cureus. 2024 May 21;16(5):e60738. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60738. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Primary Versus Delayed Primary Incision Closure in Contaminated Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.一期缝合与延期缝合在污染性腹部手术中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2019 Jul;239:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.047. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
10
Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Followed by Delayed Primary Closure for Abdominal Wounds in Patients with Lower Gastrointestinal Perforations: Multicenter Prospective Study.负压伤口治疗联合二期延迟缝合对下消化道穿孔患者腹部伤口的疗效:多中心前瞻性研究
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020 Jul 30;4(3):114-121. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2019-043. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical Review on Delayed Primary Closure: Basic Science and Clinical Applications.延迟一期缝合的实践综述:基础科学与临床应用
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Aug 4;11(8):e5172. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005172. eCollection 2023 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation in the Management of Complex Wounds in Critically Ill Patients.在危重症患者复杂伤口管理中应用负压伤口治疗联合滴注法
Wounds. 2019 Jan;31(1):E1-E4.
2
Efficacy of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy for Preventing Surgical Site Infections after Surgery for Peritonitis Attributable to Lower-Gastrointestinal Perforation: A Single-Institution Experience.负压伤口治疗对预防下消化道穿孔所致腹膜炎手术后手术部位感染的疗效:单机构经验
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018 Oct;19(7):711-716. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.134. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
3
Negative pressure wound therapy with instillation, a cost-effective treatment for abdominal mesh exposure.
滴注式负压伤口治疗,一种治疗腹部补片外露的经济有效疗法。
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):311-318. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1691-y. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
4
Comparison of Superficial Surgical Site Infection Between Delayed Primary Versus Primary Wound Closure in Complicated Appendicitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.复杂性阑尾炎中延期一期缝合与一期缝合切口浅层感染的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Apr;267(4):631-637. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002464.
5
A comparative study of negative pressure wound therapy with and without instillation of saline on wound healing.负压伤口治疗中有无生理盐水滴注对伤口愈合影响的比较研究。
J Wound Care. 2016 Aug;25(8):475-8. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.8.475.
6
Comparison of Outcomes for Normal Saline and an Antiseptic Solution for Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation.用于滴注式负压伤口治疗的生理盐水与防腐溶液的效果比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5):657e-664e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001709.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of delayed primary wound closure in contaminated abdominal wounds.污染性腹部伤口延迟一期伤口缝合随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Sep 6;9(1):49. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-49. eCollection 2014.
8
Recommendations on negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and antimicrobial solutions - when, where and how to use: what does the evidence show?负压伤口治疗联合灌洗和抗菌溶液的推荐意见 - 何时、何地以及如何使用:证据显示了什么?
Int Wound J. 2013 Dec;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):32-42. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12183.
9
New continuous negative-pressure and irrigation treatment for infected wounds and intractable ulcers.新型持续负压与灌洗治疗感染性伤口及顽固性溃疡
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Oct;120(5):1257-1265. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000279332.27374.69.
10
Quantifying bacterial bioburden during negative pressure wound therapy: does the wound VAC enhance bacterial clearance?负压伤口治疗期间细菌生物负荷的量化:伤口负压封闭引流术(VAC)是否能增强细菌清除能力?
Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Mar;52(3):276-9; discussion 279-80. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000111861.75927.4d.