Remick Jill S, Sabouri Pouya, Zhu Mingyao, Bentzen Søren M, Sun Kai, Kwok Young, Kaiser Adeel
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Int J Part Ther. 2020 Nov 13;7(3):11-23. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00029.1. eCollection 2021 Winter.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To compare the dose escalation potential of stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) versus stereotactic body photon therapy (SBXT) using high-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (HDR-B) dose-prescription metrics.
Twenty-five patients previously treated with radiation for prostate cancer were identified and stratified by prostate size (≤ 50cc; = 13, > 50cc; = 12). Initial CT simulation scans were re-planned using SBXT and SBPT modalities using a prescription dose of 19Gy in 2 fractions. Target coverage goals were designed to mimic the dose distributions of HDR-B and maximized to the upper limit constraint for the rectum and urethra. Dosimetric parameters between SBPT and SBXT were compared using the signed-rank test and again after stratification for prostate size (≤ 50cm and >50cm) using the Wilcoxon rank test.
Prostate volume receiving 100% of the dose (V100) was significantly greater for SBXT (99%) versus SBPT (96%) ( ≤ 0.01), whereas the median V125 (82% vs. 73%, < 0.01) and V200 (12% vs. 2%, < 0.01) was significantly greater for SBPT compared to SBXT. Median V150 was 49% for both cohorts ( = 0.92). V125 and V200 were significantly correlated with prostate size. For prostates > 50cm, V200 was significantly greater with SBPT compared to SBXT (14.5% vs. 1%, = 0.005), but not for prostates 50cm (9% vs 4%, = 0.11). Median dose to 2cm of the bladder neck was significantly lower with SBPT versus SBXT (9.6 Gy vs. 14 Gy, < 0.01).
SBPT and SBXT can be used to simulate an HDR-B boost for locally advanced prostate cancer. SBPT demonstrated greater dose escalation potential than SBXT. These results are relevant for future trial design, particularly in patients with high risk prostate cancer who are not amenable to brachytherapy.
目的/目标:使用高剂量率前列腺近距离放射治疗(HDR - B)剂量处方指标,比较立体定向体部质子治疗(SBPT)与立体定向体部光子治疗(SBXT)的剂量递增潜力。
确定25例先前接受过前列腺癌放疗的患者,并根据前列腺大小进行分层(≤50cc;n = 13,>50cc;n = 12)。使用SBXT和SBPT模式对初始CT模拟扫描进行重新规划,处方剂量为19Gy,分2次给予。靶区覆盖目标旨在模拟HDR - B的剂量分布,并最大化至直肠和尿道的上限约束。使用符号秩检验比较SBPT和SBXT之间的剂量学参数,并在根据前列腺大小(≤50cm和>50cm)分层后,再次使用Wilcoxon秩检验进行比较。
接受100%剂量的前列腺体积(V100),SBXT(99%)显著大于SBPT(96%)(P≤0.01),而SBPT的中位V125(82%对73%,P<0.01)和V200(12%对2%,P<0.01)显著大于SBXT。两个队列的中位V150均为49%(P = 0.92)。V125和V200与前列腺大小显著相关。对于>50cm的前列腺,SBPT的V200显著大于SBXT(14.5%对1%,P = 0.005),但对于≤50cm的前列腺则不然(9%对4%,P = 0.11)。SBPT时膀胱颈2cm处的中位剂量显著低于SBXT(9.6 Gy对14 Gy,P<0.01)。
SBPT和SBXT可用于模拟局部晚期前列腺癌的HDR - B增敏治疗。SBPT显示出比SBXT更大的剂量递增潜力。这些结果与未来的试验设计相关,特别是对于不适合近距离放射治疗的高危前列腺癌患者。