• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种为对照组分配临床试验等待时间的自适应方法。

An adaptive method for assigning clinical trials wait-times for controls.

作者信息

Sima Adam P, Stromberg Katharine A, Kreutzer Jeffrey S

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jan 20;21:100727. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100727. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100727
PMID:33604487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7872975/
Abstract

Wait-list control clinical trials are popular among psychologists and rehabilitation specialists partly because all participants receive the intervention. In 2 arm wait-list control trials, individuals randomized to the treatment group receive immediate treatment whereas individuals randomized to the control group wait a fixed amount of time before intervention is initiated. For interventions that have varying durations, careful consideration must be given to the period that participants in the control group have a delay until treatment begins, as incongruent wait times compared to the intervention durations of the treatment group may introduce confounding into the evaluation of the treatment differences. To alleviate this issue, we propose to adaptively assign wait times to individuals randomized to the control group based on the intervention duration of those in the treatment group. Simulations demonstrate the that our method not only results in similar timing distributions between participants in the treatment and control groups, but also allows participants in the control group to initiate treatment earlier than the traditional design. The latter characteristic may reduce dropout and result in more efficient study enrollment.

摘要

等待名单对照临床试验在心理学家和康复专家中很受欢迎,部分原因是所有参与者都能接受干预。在双臂等待名单对照试验中,随机分配到治疗组的个体立即接受治疗,而随机分配到对照组的个体则要等待一段固定的时间才开始干预。对于持续时间不同的干预措施,必须仔细考虑对照组参与者在开始治疗前的延迟时间,因为与治疗组干预持续时间不一致的等待时间可能会在评估治疗差异时引入混杂因素。为了缓解这个问题,我们建议根据治疗组个体的干预持续时间,为随机分配到对照组的个体自适应地分配等待时间。模拟结果表明,我们的方法不仅能使治疗组和对照组参与者的时间分布相似,还能让对照组参与者比传统设计更早开始治疗。后一个特点可能会减少失访率,并提高研究招募的效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/74bc223aef66/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/bf703f0c4ff7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/2df2d738dc63/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/290b854bf338/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/74bc223aef66/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/bf703f0c4ff7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/2df2d738dc63/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/290b854bf338/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/124c/7872975/74bc223aef66/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
An adaptive method for assigning clinical trials wait-times for controls.一种为对照组分配临床试验等待时间的自适应方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jan 20;21:100727. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100727. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Efficacy of the resilience and adjustment intervention after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.创伤性脑损伤后恢复力与适应干预的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Brain Inj. 2018;32(8):963-971. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1468577. Epub 2018 May 24.
4
Dynamic wait-listed designs for randomized trials: new designs for prevention of youth suicide.随机试验的动态候补名单设计:预防青少年自杀的新设计
Clin Trials. 2006;3(3):259-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn152oa.
5
Testing an early online intervention for the treatment of disturbed sleep during the COVID-19 pandemic (Sleep COVID-19): structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.测试针对 COVID-19 大流行期间睡眠障碍的早期在线干预措施(睡眠 COVID-19):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Aug 8;21(1):704. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04644-0.
6
Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention on Reducing Misconceptions Among Ethnic Minorities With Complicated Mild to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.一项教育干预措施对减少患有复杂轻至重度创伤性脑损伤的少数民族人群误解的效果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Apr;98(4):751-758. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
7
Evaluating the effectiveness of on-road driving remediation following acquired brain injury: A wait-list feasibility study with follow-up.评估脑损伤后道路驾驶康复的效果:一项基于等待名单的可行性研究及其随访。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2021 Apr;68(2):124-134. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12694. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
Self-administered acupressure for symptom management among Chinese family caregivers with caregiver stress: a randomized, wait-list controlled trial.自我实施穴位按压对有照护压力的中国家庭照护者症状管理的效果:一项随机、等待列表对照试验
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):424. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1409-1.
9
Effect of a Qigong Intervention on Telomerase Activity and Mental Health in Chinese Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.气功干预对亲密伴侣暴力中国女性幸存者端粒酶活性和心理健康的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6967.
10
When wait lists are not feasible, nothing is a thing that does not need to be done.当等待名单不可行时,没有什么是必须要做的。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Dec;77(6):1159-68. doi: 10.1037/a0016878.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten years of Women's Wellness research: Key lessons from conducting randomised controlled trials of a whole-of-lifestyle behavioural intervention.十年女性健康研究:开展全生活方式行为干预随机对照试验的关键经验教训
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Feb 3;44:101441. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101441. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Aerobic Physical Activity and Depression Among Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.有氧运动与癌症患者抑郁:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2437964. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37964.
3
The effectiveness of a dynamic seat cushion in preventing neck and low-back pain among high-risk office workers: a 6-month cluster-randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Considerations in Adaptive Design Clinical Trials.适应性设计临床试验中的伦理考量
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Mar;51(2):190-199. doi: 10.1177/2168479016667766. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
2
Efficacy of the resilience and adjustment intervention after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.创伤性脑损伤后恢复力与适应干预的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Brain Inj. 2018;32(8):963-971. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1468577. Epub 2018 May 24.
3
Adaptive design clinical trials: a review of the literature and ClinicalTrials.gov.
动态坐垫预防高风险办公人群颈腰痛的效果:一项 6 个月的整群随机对照试验。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Oct 1;50(7):555-566. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4184. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
4
Mobile App Promoting Resilience in Stress Management for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.移动应用程序促进青少年和青年癌症患者压力管理中的韧性:一项试点随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 30;13:e57950. doi: 10.2196/57950.
5
An mHealth Intervention to Address Depression and Improve Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Among Youths Living With HIV in Uganda: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对乌干达感染艾滋病毒青年的抑郁症并提高抗逆转录病毒疗法依从性的移动健康干预措施:一项试点随机对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 8;13:e54635. doi: 10.2196/54635.
6
Increasing transcultural competence in clinical psychologists through a web-based training: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.通过基于网络的培训提高临床心理学家的跨文化能力:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jan 20;25(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07878-w.
适应性设计临床试验:文献综述与ClinicalTrials.gov分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 10;8(2):e018320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018320.
4
Control conditions for randomised trials of behavioural interventions in psychiatry: a decision framework.精神病学行为干预随机试验的对照条件:一个决策框架
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;4(9):725-732. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30153-0. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
5
The use of waitlists as control conditions in anxiety disorders research.在焦虑症研究中使用等候名单作为对照条件。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;83:112-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
6
Psychologists' Perspectives on Therapy Termination and the Use of Therapy Engagement/Retention Strategies.心理学家对治疗终止及治疗参与/维持策略运用的观点。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 May;24(3):687-696. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2037. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
The Effects of Waiting for Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Waitlist Control Groups in Randomized Controlled Trials for Social Anxiety Disorder.等待治疗的影响:社交焦虑障碍随机对照试验中等待名单对照组的荟萃分析
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 May;24(3):649-660. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2032. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
8
Effects of study design and allocation on self-reported alcohol consumption: randomized trial.研究设计与分配对自我报告饮酒量的影响:随机试验
Trials. 2015 Mar 28;16:127. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0642-0.
9
Does socioeconomic status, age, or gender influence appointment attendance and completion of 24-hour urine collections?社会经济地位、年龄或性别会影响预约就诊率和24小时尿液收集的完成情况吗?
Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.043.
10
Are outcome-adaptive allocation trials ethical?结果适应性分配试验是否符合伦理道德?
Clin Trials. 2015 Apr;12(2):102-6. doi: 10.1177/1740774514563583. Epub 2015 Feb 3.