Suppr超能文献

一项评估阿那白滞素治疗痛风发作的疗效和安全性的随机、II 期研究。

A Randomized, Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Anakinra in the Treatment of Gout Flares.

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Aug;73(8):1533-1542. doi: 10.1002/art.41699. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra compared to triamcinolone in the treatment of gout flares.

METHODS

Patients for whom nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and colchicine were not suitable treatments were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind study with follow-up for up to 2 years. The study was designed to assess superiority of anakinra (100 or 200 mg/day for 5 days) over triamcinolone (40 mg in a single injection) for the primary end point of changed patient-assessed pain intensity in the most affected joint (scored on a visual analog scale of 0-100) from baseline to 24-72 hours. Secondary outcome measures included: safety, immunogenicity, and patient- and physician-assessed global response.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-five patients were randomized to receive anakinra (n = 110) or triamcinolone (n = 55). The median age was 55 years (range 25-83), 87% were men, the mean disease duration was 8.7 years, and the mean number of self-reported flares during the prior year was 4.5. A total of 301 flares were treated (214 with anakinra; 87 with triamcinolone). Anakinra in both doses and triamcinolone provided clinically meaningful reduction in patient-assessed pain intensity in the first and subsequent flares. For the first flare, the mean decline in pain intensity from baseline to 24-72 hours for total anakinra and triamcinolone was -41.2 and -39.4, respectively (P = 0.688). Anakinra performed better than triamcinolone for most secondary end points. There were no unexpected safety findings. The presence of antidrug antibodies was not associated with adverse events or altered pain reduction.

CONCLUSION

Anakinra was not superior to triamcinolone for the primary end point, but had comparable efficacy in pain reduction and was favored for most secondary end points. Anakinra is an effective option for gout flares when conventional therapy is unsuitable.

摘要

目的

评估阿那白滞素与曲安奈德治疗痛风发作的疗效和安全性。

方法

本多中心、随机、双盲研究纳入了不适合使用非甾体抗炎药和秋水仙碱治疗的患者,随访时间长达 2 年。该研究旨在评估阿那白滞素(100 或 200 mg/天,连用 5 天)相对于曲安奈德(40 mg 单次注射)在主要终点(从基线到 24-72 小时最受影响关节的患者评估疼痛强度变化,用 0-100 的视觉模拟评分进行评分)方面的优越性。次要终点包括:安全性、免疫原性以及患者和医生评估的整体反应。

结果

165 例患者被随机分配至接受阿那白滞素(n = 110)或曲安奈德(n = 55)治疗。中位年龄为 55 岁(范围 25-83),87%为男性,平均疾病病程为 8.7 年,既往 1 年中报告的发作次数平均为 4.5 次。共治疗了 301 次发作(阿那白滞素 214 次,曲安奈德 87 次)。两种剂量的阿那白滞素和曲安奈德均能在首次及后续发作中提供有临床意义的患者评估疼痛强度降低。对于首次发作,从基线到 24-72 小时,总阿那白滞素和曲安奈德的疼痛强度下降分别为-41.2 和-39.4(P = 0.688)。阿那白滞素在大多数次要终点方面表现优于曲安奈德。未发现意外的安全性问题。抗药物抗体的存在与不良事件或疼痛减轻改变无关。

结论

阿那白滞素在主要终点方面并不优于曲安奈德,但在减轻疼痛方面具有相当的疗效,并在大多数次要终点方面更受青睐。当常规治疗不适用时,阿那白滞素是痛风发作的有效治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验