School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Centre for Urban Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.
Ecol Appl. 2021 Jun;31(4):e02309. doi: 10.1002/eap.2309. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
The contribution of urban greenspaces to support biodiversity and provide benefits for people is increasingly recognized. However, ongoing management practices favor vegetation oversimplification, often limiting greenspaces to lawns and tree canopy rather than multi-layered vegetation that includes under- and midstorey, and the use of nonnative species. These practices hinder the potential of greenspaces to sustain indigenous biodiversity, particularly for taxa like insects that rely on plants for food and habitat. Yet, little is known about which plant species may maximize positive outcomes for taxonomically and functionally diverse insect communities in greenspaces. Additionally, while cities are expected to experience high rates of introductions, quantitative assessments of the relative occupancy of indigenous vs. introduced insect species in greenspace are rare, hindering understanding of how management may promote indigenous biodiversity while limiting the establishment of introduced insects. Using a hierarchically replicated study design across 15 public parks, we recorded occurrence data from 552 insect species on 133 plant species, differing in planting design element (lawn, midstorey, and tree canopy), midstorey growth form (forbs, lilioids, graminoids, and shrubs) and origin (nonnative, native, and indigenous), to assess (1) the relative contributions of indigenous and introduced insect species and (2) which plant species sustained the highest number of indigenous insects. We found that the insect community was overwhelmingly composed of indigenous rather than introduced species. Our findings further highlight the core role of multi-layered vegetation in sustaining high insect biodiversity in urban areas, with indigenous midstorey and canopy representing key elements to maintain rich and functionally diverse indigenous insect communities. Intriguingly, graminoids supported the highest indigenous insect richness across all studied growth forms by plant origin groups. Our work highlights the opportunity presented by indigenous understory and midstorey plants, particularly indigenous graminoids, in our study area to promote indigenous insect biodiversity in urban greenspaces. Our study provides a blueprint and stimulus for architects, engineers, developers, designers, and planners to incorporate into their practice plant species palettes that foster a larger presence of indigenous over regionally native or nonnative plant species, while incorporating a broader mixture of midstorey growth forms.
城市绿地对支持生物多样性和为人们提供益处的贡献越来越受到认可。然而,持续的管理实践倾向于简化植被,通常将绿地局限于草坪和树冠层,而不是包括底层和中层以及使用非本地物种的多层次植被。这些做法阻碍了绿地维持本土生物多样性的潜力,特别是对于像昆虫这样依赖植物作为食物和栖息地的类群。然而,对于哪些植物物种可能最大限度地提高绿地中分类和功能多样的昆虫群落的积极结果,知之甚少。此外,虽然预计城市将经历高的引入率,但对绿地中本土与引入昆虫物种相对占据的定量评估很少,这阻碍了对管理如何在促进本土生物多样性的同时限制引入昆虫建立的理解。我们使用跨 15 个公共公园的分层复制研究设计,记录了 133 种植物上 552 种昆虫的出现数据,这些植物在种植设计元素(草坪、中层和树冠层)、中层生长形式(草本、百合科、禾本科和灌木)和来源(非本地、本地和本土)上有所不同,以评估(1)本土和引入昆虫物种的相对贡献,以及(2)哪些植物物种维持了最多的本土昆虫。我们发现昆虫群落主要由本土物种组成,而不是引入物种。我们的研究结果进一步强调了多层次植被在维持城市地区高昆虫生物多样性方面的核心作用,本土中层和树冠层是维持丰富和功能多样的本土昆虫群落的关键要素。有趣的是,禾本科植物在所有研究的植物起源组中支撑着最高的本土昆虫丰富度。我们的工作强调了本土下层和中层植物,特别是本土禾本科植物,在我们研究区域中促进城市绿地中本土昆虫生物多样性的机会。我们的研究为建筑师、工程师、开发商、设计师和规划师提供了蓝图和激励,以将促进本土而不是区域本土或非本土植物物种的存在,并纳入更广泛的中层生长形式的植物物种调色板纳入他们的实践。