Spine Unit 1, Bordeaux University Hospital, Place Amelie Raba-Leon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1155-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06767-7. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
Sagittal lumbar apex has been demonstrated to be a key parameter in sagittal plane morphology. Our aim was to understand its behavior with postural changes, analyzing two different concepts of lumbar apex.
Prospective observational study with a cohort of patients presenting sagittal malalignment identified from a monocenter database of adult spinal deformities (ASD). Inclusion criteria were age > 30 years, SVA > 40 mm, and/or PT > 20. All patients had full-spine EOS radiographs in 2 different positions: (P1: natural position) and position 2 (P2: compensated position). Sagittal alignment, spinopelvic values, and two different methods of assessing lordosis apex location were analyzed in both P1 and P2 positions. Changes between P1 and P2 were compared using a paired t test with a significance level at p < 0.05.
Twenty-five patients were recruited (21 women and 4 men). The mean age was 64.8 years (range 21-79). The patient's main compensation was based on an increase in the femoral shaft angle, and pelvic retroversion, with a subsequent decrease in sacral slope, and therefore of the lower lumbar arc. When the lumbar apex was calculated as the most anterior point touching the vertical line in a lateral radiograph, postural compensation changes modified its location usually shifting it to a more caudal position. When the lumbar apex was assessed as the most distant point of the global lumbar lordosis, its position remained stable regardless of compensation.
Postural changes can modify the location of the lumbar apex when understanding its location as the cornerstone of sagittal plane harmonic distribution. This concept can be useful as an additional sign to assess compensation. However, if the lumbar apex was calculated as the angular point of the global lordosis, its position remained stable regardless of postural changes. This concept can help to mold lumbar lordosis in ASD surgery.
Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
矢状位腰椎顶点已被证明是矢状位形态的关键参数。我们的目的是了解其在姿势变化下的行为,分析腰椎顶点的两个不同概念。
这是一项前瞻性观察研究,研究对象为从成人脊柱畸形(ASD)单中心数据库中确定的存在矢状面失平衡的患者队列。纳入标准为年龄>30 岁,SVA>40mm 和/或 PT>20°。所有患者均行全脊柱 EOS 正侧位片,拍摄时患者分别处于两种不同体位:(P1:自然位)和位置 2(P2:补偿位)。在 P1 和 P2 位时,对矢状面排列、脊柱骨盆参数和两种不同的腰椎前凸顶点定位方法进行分析。使用配对 t 检验比较 P1 和 P2 之间的变化,p<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。
共纳入 25 例患者(21 例女性和 4 例男性),平均年龄 64.8 岁(21-79 岁)。患者的主要代偿机制是股骨干轴角度和骨盆后倾增加,骶骨倾斜度和下腰椎弧度相应减小。当腰椎顶点定义为侧位片上最接近垂直线的最前点时,姿势补偿改变会改变其位置,通常使其向更尾端移动。当腰椎顶点定义为整体腰椎前凸最远端点时,其位置保持稳定,不受补偿影响。
当理解腰椎顶点在矢状面和谐分布中的基石位置时,姿势变化可以改变腰椎顶点的位置。这一概念可以作为评估补偿的附加标志。然而,如果将腰椎顶点定义为整体前凸的角点,则无论姿势变化如何,其位置保持稳定。这一概念有助于在 ASD 手术中塑造腰椎前凸。
证据等级 IV:诊断:具有一致应用参考标准和盲法的个体横断面研究。