• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic characteristics of suitable wolf habitat in Sweden.瑞典适合狼栖息地的社会经济特征。
Ambio. 2021 Jun;50(6):1259-1268. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01524-y. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
A landscape of overlapping risks for wolf-human conflict in Wisconsin, USA.美国威斯康星州狼与人冲突风险重叠的景观。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109307. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109307. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
3
Elk migration patterns and human activity influence wolf habitat use in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.麋鹿的迁徙模式和人类活动影响大黄石生态系统中狼的栖息地利用。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2293-307. doi: 10.1890/11-1829.1.
4
Conflict Misleads Large Carnivore Management and Conservation: Brown Bears and Wolves in Spain.冲突误导大型食肉动物的管理与保护:西班牙的棕熊与狼
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0151541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151541. eCollection 2016.
5
The wolf (canis lupus) as a symbol of an urban-rural divide? Results from a media discourse analysis on the human-wolf conflict in Germany.狼(Canis lupus)作为城乡鸿沟的象征?德国人狼冲突的媒体话语分析结果。
Environ Manage. 2022 Dec;70(6):1051-1065. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01719-3. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
6
How many wolves (Canis lupus) fit into Germany? The role of assumptions in predictive rule-based habitat models for habitat generalists.德国能容纳多少只狼(犬属狼种)?假设在基于规则的栖息地通才物种预测模型中的作用。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e101798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101798. eCollection 2014.
7
Desert pastoralists' negative and positive effects on rare wildlife in the Gobi.沙漠牧民对戈壁地区珍稀野生动物的负面影响与正面影响。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):269-277. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12881. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
Distribution model transferability for a wide-ranging species, the Gray Wolf.分布模型可转移性研究——以灰狼为例
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 8;12(1):13556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16121-6.
9
Geo-spatial aspects of acceptance of illegal hunting of large carnivores in Scandinavia.非法狩猎大型食肉动物在斯堪的纳维亚的接受程度的地理空间方面。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 24;8(7):e68849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068849. Print 2013.
10
Implications of Harvest on the Boundaries of Protected Areas for Large Carnivore Viewing Opportunities.大型食肉动物观赏机会对保护区边界的收获影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0153808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153808. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception Toward Wolves Are Driven by Economic Status and Religion Across Their Distribution Range.在狼的分布范围内,人们对狼的认知受经济状况和宗教信仰的驱动。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Apr 23;15(9):1196. doi: 10.3390/ani15091196.
2
The wolf (canis lupus) as a symbol of an urban-rural divide? Results from a media discourse analysis on the human-wolf conflict in Germany.狼(Canis lupus)作为城乡鸿沟的象征?德国人狼冲突的媒体话语分析结果。
Environ Manage. 2022 Dec;70(6):1051-1065. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01719-3. Epub 2022 Sep 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing inequality and intolerance in human-wildlife coexistence.解决人与野生动物共存中的不平等和不容忍问题。
Conserv Biol. 2020 Aug;34(4):803-810. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13471. Epub 2020 May 14.
2
Managing conflict between large carnivores and livestock.大 carnivores(大 carnivores 是对肉食性哺乳动物的统称,在中文中没有统一的翻译,通常翻译为“大型食肉动物”或“肉食哺乳动物”)与家畜之间的冲突管理。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12959. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human-predator relations.关于改善人类与食肉动物关系的当前及未来方法的跨学科综述。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Jun;31(3):513-523. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12859. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
4
Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes.欧洲现代人类主导景观中大食肉动物的恢复。
Science. 2014 Dec 19;346(6216):1517-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1257553.
5
A meta-analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976-2012.1976-2012 年欧洲各地针对熊和狼的态度研究的荟萃分析。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):565-74. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12420. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
6
Ecology. Whose conservation?生态学。谁来保护?
Science. 2014 Sep 26;345(6204):1558-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1254704.
7
Ecology. Tolerance for predatory wildlife.生态学。对食肉野生动物的耐受性。
Science. 2014 May 2;344(6183):476-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1252690.
8
Big cats in our backyards: persistence of large carnivores in a human dominated landscape in India.后院里的大型猫科动物:印度人类主导景观中大型食肉动物的持续存在。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057872. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
9
Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe.射杀、掩埋与闭嘴:隐秘偷猎减缓了欧洲大型食肉动物的恢复进程。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Mar 7;279(1730):910-5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1275. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
10
The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology.反正弦法很愚蠢:生态学中的比例分析。
Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10. doi: 10.1890/10-0340.1.

瑞典适合狼栖息地的社会经济特征。

Socioeconomic characteristics of suitable wolf habitat in Sweden.

机构信息

Research Unit of Biodiversity (UO-CSIC-PA), Mieres Campus, University of Oviedo, 33600, Mieres, Asturias, Spain.

Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Ambio. 2021 Jun;50(6):1259-1268. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01524-y. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-021-01524-y
PMID:33606248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8068747/
Abstract

Large carnivores are ecologically important, but their behaviour frequently put them in conflict with humans. I suggest that a spatial co-occurrence of suitable habitat and relatively poor socioeconomic conditions in rural areas may contribute to inflated human-carnivore conflict. Here, I test if there is potential for such an explanation for the human-wolf conflict in Sweden, a conflict that is arguably not congruent with the costs and damages imposed by the wolf population. I found negative correlations between wolf habitat suitability within Swedish municipalities and indicators of their relative socioeconomic conditions. I argue that geographic socioeconomic inequality may contribute to the Swedish human-wolf conflict, partly by the use of wolves as symbols for socioeconomic dissent and partly by using them as scapegoats for socioeconomic conditions. Therefore, regional policies aimed at alleviating geographic socioeconomic inequities may create a more favourable environment for solving the human-wolf conflict in Sweden.

摘要

大型食肉动物在生态系统中具有重要作用,但它们的行为经常使其与人类发生冲突。我认为,在农村地区,适宜栖息地的空间共存和相对较差的社会经济条件可能导致人与食肉动物冲突加剧。在这里,我测试了这种解释是否适用于瑞典的人与狼冲突,这种冲突与狼种群造成的成本和损害并不一致。我发现,瑞典市政当局内部狼栖息地适宜性与相对社会经济条件指标之间存在负相关关系。我认为,地理社会经济不平等可能导致瑞典的人狼冲突,部分原因是将狼用作社会经济异议的象征,部分原因是将其用作社会经济条件的替罪羊。因此,旨在减轻地理社会经济不平等的区域政策可能为解决瑞典的人狼冲突创造更有利的环境。