• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于自然的解决方案公众接受度研究综述:减少灾害风险措施成功的“原因”“时机”和“方式”。

A review of public acceptance of nature-based solutions: The 'why', 'when', and 'how' of success for disaster risk reduction measures.

机构信息

School of Interdisciplinary Studies, The University of Glasgow, Dumfries Campus Maxwell House Crichton University, Campus Dumfries, Glasgow, DG1 4UQ, UK.

School of Interdisciplinary Studies, The University of Glasgow, Dumfries Campus Rutherford/McCowan Building, Crichton University Campus Dumfries, Glasgow, DG1 4ZL, UK.

出版信息

Ambio. 2021 Aug;50(8):1552-1573. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01502-4. Epub 2021 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-021-01502-4
PMID:33606249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8249538/
Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) are increasingly recognized as sustainable approaches to address societal challenges. Disaster risk reduction (DRR) has benefited by moving away from purely 'grey' infrastructure measures towards NbS. However, this shift also furthers an increasing trend of reliance on public acceptance to plan, implement and manage DRR measures. In this review, we examine how unique NbS characteristics relate to public acceptance through a comparison with grey measures, and we identify influential acceptance factors related to individuals, society, and DRR measures. Based on the review, we introduce the PA-NbS model that highlights the role of risk perception, trust, competing societal interests, and ecosystem services. Efforts to increase acceptance should focus on providing and promoting awareness of benefits combined with effective communication and collaboration. Further research is required to understand interconnections among identified factors and how they can be leveraged for the success and further uptake of NbS.

摘要

基于自然的解决方案(NbS)越来越被认为是应对社会挑战的可持续方法。减少灾害风险(DRR)已经受益于远离纯粹的“灰色”基础设施措施,转向 NbS。然而,这一转变也进一步加剧了对公众接受度的依赖,以规划、实施和管理 DRR 措施。在这篇综述中,我们通过与灰色措施进行比较,考察了 NbS 的独特特征如何通过与灰色措施进行比较,与公众接受度相关,并确定了与个人、社会和 DRR 措施相关的有影响力的接受因素。基于综述,我们引入了 PA-NbS 模型,突出了风险感知、信任、竞争的社会利益和生态系统服务的作用。提高接受度的努力应侧重于提供和宣传效益,同时结合有效的沟通和协作。需要进一步研究以了解确定因素之间的相互联系以及如何利用这些因素来促进 NbS 的成功和进一步采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/4852219e95fe/13280_2021_1502_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/2081b5fc764a/13280_2021_1502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/3f25b1371738/13280_2021_1502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/f5130f091c81/13280_2021_1502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/49ae85985760/13280_2021_1502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/0af56c8b8584/13280_2021_1502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/a75aa889dbfd/13280_2021_1502_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/c72f54cde565/13280_2021_1502_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/4852219e95fe/13280_2021_1502_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/2081b5fc764a/13280_2021_1502_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/3f25b1371738/13280_2021_1502_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/f5130f091c81/13280_2021_1502_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/49ae85985760/13280_2021_1502_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/0af56c8b8584/13280_2021_1502_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/a75aa889dbfd/13280_2021_1502_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/c72f54cde565/13280_2021_1502_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d294/8249538/4852219e95fe/13280_2021_1502_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A review of public acceptance of nature-based solutions: The 'why', 'when', and 'how' of success for disaster risk reduction measures.基于自然的解决方案公众接受度研究综述:减少灾害风险措施成功的“原因”“时机”和“方式”。
Ambio. 2021 Aug;50(8):1552-1573. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01502-4. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
2
Green, hybrid, or grey disaster risk reduction measures: What shapes public preferences for nature-based solutions?绿色、混合或灰色的减少灾害风险措施:是什么塑造了公众对基于自然的解决方案的偏好?
J Environ Manage. 2022 May 15;310:114727. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114727. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
3
The underexposed nature-based solutions: A critical state-of-art review on drought mitigation.被低估的基于自然的解决方案:缓解干旱的关键现状综述。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Feb 14;352:119903. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119903. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
Land use management recommendations for reducing the risk of downstream flooding based on a land use change analysis and the concept of ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction.基于土地利用变化分析和基于生态系统的灾害风险减少概念的降低下游洪水风险的土地利用管理建议。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 1;287:112341. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112341. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
5
The role of public participation in disaster risk reduction initiatives: The case of Katlehong township.公众参与在减灾倡议中的作用:以卡特洪镇为例。
Jamba. 2022 Feb 28;14(1):1203. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1203. eCollection 2022.
6
Nature-Based Resilience: Experiences of Five Cities from South Asia.基于自然的韧性:来自南亚五个城市的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;19(19):11846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911846.
7
"I believe this team will change how society views youth in disasters": the EnRiCH Youth Research Team: a youth-led community-based disaster risk reduction program in Ottawa, Canada.“我相信这个团队将改变社会对灾害中青年的看法”:EnRiCH 青年研究团队:加拿大渥太华的一个以青年为主导的基于社区的减少灾害风险项目。
Can J Public Health. 2021 Oct;112(5):957-964. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00486-8. Epub 2021 May 18.
8
Effectiveness of small- and large-scale Nature-Based Solutions for flood mitigation: The case of Ayutthaya, Thailand.小尺度和大尺度基于自然的解决方案在减轻洪灾方面的有效性:以泰国大城府为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147725. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147725. Epub 2021 May 14.
9
On the cost-effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions for reducing disaster risk.基于自然的灾害风险减少解决方案的成本效益分析
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Oct 15;947:174524. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174524. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
10
Pathways of ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: A global review of empirical evidence.基于生态系统的灾害风险管理途径:全球实证证据综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jun 15;929:172721. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172721. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Social science to accelerate coastal adaptation to sea-level rise.社会科学助力沿海地区加速适应海平面上升。
Camb Prism Coast Futur. 2023 Aug 29;1:e37. doi: 10.1017/cft.2023.25. eCollection 2023.
2
Randomised land use pathway generation allows efficient multi-outcome appraisal.随机土地利用路径生成实现了高效的多结果评估。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 23;15(1):18001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00919-1.
3
Effects of tropical cyclone Freddy on the social determinants of health: the narrative review of the experience in Malawi.热带气旋弗雷迪对健康社会决定因素的影响:马拉维经验的叙述性综述

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing stakeholders' risk perception to promote Nature Based Solutions as flood protection strategies: The case of the Glinščica river (Slovenia).评估利益相关者对自然为本解决方案的风险认知,以促进其成为洪水防护策略:以 Glinščica 河(斯洛文尼亚)为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 10;655:188-201. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.116. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
2
Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges.欧盟基于自然的解决方案:借助自然创新,应对社会、经济和环境挑战。
Environ Res. 2017 Nov;159:509-518. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
3
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Apr 16;2(1):e000512. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000512. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Social-ecological system trajectories of peri-urban watersheds based on a spatial analysis of vulnerability components: A case study in Mexico City, 1999-2039.基于脆弱性构成要素的空间分析的城郊流域社会-生态系统轨迹:以 1999-2039 年墨西哥城为例
Ambio. 2024 Dec;53(12):1830-1846. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02053-0. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
5
Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions.用于推进城市规划边界工作的地理设计:一项聚焦于基于自然的解决方案的斯德哥尔摩研究。
Ambio. 2025 Feb;54(2):285-304. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
6
Meta-analysis indicates better climate adaptation and mitigation performance of hybrid engineering-natural coastal defence measures.荟萃分析表明,混合工程 - 自然海岸防御措施在气候适应和缓解方面表现更佳。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 9;15(1):2870. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46970-w.
7
Perceptions of environmental problems and solutions in Florida across sectors: A survey of key stakeholders and the public.佛罗里达州各部门对环境问题及解决方案的看法:对主要利益相关者和公众的调查。
Ambio. 2023 Jun;52(6):1098-1111. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01829-0. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
Nature-based solutions efficiency evaluation against natural hazards: Modelling methods, advantages and limitations.基于自然的解决方案应对自然灾害的效率评估:建模方法、优点和局限性。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Aug 25;784:147058. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147058. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective.
基于自然的解决方案的科学、政策和实践:跨学科视角。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;579:1215-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
4
Implementing participatory monitoring in river management: The role of stakeholders' perspectives and incentives.参与式监测在河流管理中的应用:利益相关者视角和激励的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jun 15;195(Pt 1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.035. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
5
Landowner's perception of flood risk and preventive actions in estuarine environment: An empirical investigation.沿海环境中土地所有者对洪水风险的认知及预防措施:一项实证研究。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Sep 15;180:272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.037. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
6
The risk perception paradox--implications for governance and communication of natural hazards.风险感知悖论——对自然灾害治理和沟通的启示。
Risk Anal. 2013 Jun;33(6):1049-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
7
Detached breakwaters: communities' preferences for sustainable coastal protection.分离式防波堤:社区对可持续海岸防护的偏好。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 30;115:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.029. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
8
Exploring the relationship between public environmental ethics and river flood policies in western Europe.探索西欧公共环境伦理与河流洪水政策之间的关系。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Jan;93(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.08.020. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
9
Building local community commitment to wetlands restoration: a case study of the Cache River Wetlands in southern Illinois, USA.建立当地社区对湿地恢复的承诺:以美国伊利诺伊州南部 Cache 河湿地为例。
Environ Manage. 2010 Apr;45(4):711-22. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9446-x. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
10
Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains.公众对河流修复的支持:一项关于荷兰洪泛区当地居民对河流管理和生态修复的支持及认知框架的混合方法研究
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;90(8):2680-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Mar 19.