Center for Mass Spectrometry, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030, United States.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2021 Mar 3;32(3):725-735. doi: 10.1021/jasms.0c00430. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
According to current consensus, structures of protomeric (or deprotomeric) tautomers of gaseous ions generated by electrospray ionization depend primarily on the nature of the spray solvent. To probe the effect of the spray solvent on protonation, 4-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) has often been selected as the model compound. It is widely accepted that the protonation in the gas phase takes place primarily on the carbonyl oxygen atom when the sample is sprayed in methanol and on the nitrogen atom when acetonitrile is used as the spray solvent. Although this observation is valid, our current results indicate that the determination of the predominant protomer in the gas phase by the spray solvent is an indirect effect moderated by the solvent vapor molecules present in the ambient ion source. To investigate real-time changes in protomer distributions due to solvents, we used ion-mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS). Initially, when a PABA solution in methanol was electrosprayed, the ion-mobility arrival-time profile recorded showed essentially one peak for the protomer. However, when acetonitrile or acetone were introduced to the ambient-pressure ion source via the flowing desolvation gas, the intensity of the -protomer peak diminished rapidly, and the protomer signal became dominant. The moment the acetonitrile (or acetone) vapors were removed from the ion source, the protomer-distribution signals began gradually reverting back to their original intensities. Furthermore, when PABA samples in methanol and acetonitrile were electrosprayed separately via a dual-sprayer setup, which allowed for the selective blocking of the gaseous ion-generation cascade of charged droplets from either sprayer, the predominant signal corresponded only to the -protomer, irrespective of the position of the mechanical barrier. Because the mechanical barrier prevents only the gaseous ion , but not the of solvent to the ion source, it is evident that the solvent vapor that engulfs the ion source is the governing factor that decides the protomer distribution, not the nature of the spray solvent. Noticeably, acetonitrile wields a stronger effect on the manifested protomer distribution than many other solvents, including methanol, water, hexanes, and toluene. Apparently, the so-called "memory" of the solution-phase structures and the phenomenon described as "kinetic trapping" are both due to indirect effects caused by the solvent vapor engulfing the atmospheric-pressure ion source. Moreover, the so-called "memory" effect can either be "saved" or "erased" by exposing the initially formed gaseous ions to different solvent vapors from an alternative source.
根据目前的共识,电喷雾电离产生的气态离子的聚合(或去聚合)互变异构体的结构主要取决于喷雾溶剂的性质。为了探究喷雾溶剂对质子化的影响,通常选择 4-氨基苯甲酸(PABA)作为模型化合物。人们普遍认为,当样品在甲醇中喷雾时,质子化主要发生在羰基氧原子上,而当使用乙腈作为喷雾溶剂时,质子化主要发生在氮原子上。尽管这一观察结果是正确的,但我们目前的结果表明,通过喷雾溶剂来确定气相中的主要聚合体是一种间接效应,受环境离子源中存在的溶剂蒸气分子调节。为了研究溶剂引起的聚合体分布的实时变化,我们使用离子迁移质谱(IM-MS)。最初,当甲醇中的 PABA 溶液被电喷雾时,记录的离子迁移到达时间谱显示聚合体基本上只有一个峰。然而,当乙腈或丙酮通过流动去溶剂气体引入环境压力离子源时,-聚合体峰的强度迅速减弱,聚合体信号变得占主导地位。当从离子源中除去乙腈(或丙酮)蒸气时,聚合体分布信号开始逐渐恢复到其原始强度。此外,当甲醇和乙腈中的 PABA 样品分别通过双喷雾器装置进行电喷雾时,该装置允许选择性地阻止来自任一喷雾器的带电液滴的气态离子生成级联,主要信号仅对应于 -聚合体,而与机械障碍物的位置无关。由于机械障碍物只能阻止气态离子,而不能阻止溶剂蒸气进入离子源,因此很明显,包围离子源的溶剂蒸气是决定聚合体分布的主导因素,而不是喷雾溶剂的性质。值得注意的是,乙腈对表现出的聚合体分布的影响比甲醇、水、己烷和甲苯等许多其他溶剂都要强。显然,所谓的“溶液相结构的记忆”和被描述为“动力学捕获”的现象都是由于包围大气压离子源的溶剂蒸气引起的间接效应造成的。此外,所谓的“记忆”效应可以通过将最初形成的气态离子暴露于来自替代源的不同溶剂蒸气来“保存”或“擦除”。