Suppr超能文献

俄亥俄州女性对非首选避孕方法的使用情况。

Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio.

机构信息

The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Columbus, OH, United States.

The Ohio State University, College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):328-335. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We describe the prevalence and correlates of nonuse of preferred contraceptive method among women 18-44 years of age in Ohio using contraception.

STUDY DESIGN

The population-representative Ohio Survey of Women had 2529 participants in 2018-2019, with a response rate of 33.5%. We examined prevalence of preferred method nonuse, reasons for nonuse, and satisfaction with current method among current contraception users (n = 1390). We evaluated associations between demographic and healthcare factors and preferred method nonuse.

RESULTS

About 25% of women reported not using their preferred contraceptive method. The most common barrier to obtaining preferred method was affordability (13%). Those not using their preferred method identified long-acting methods (49%), oral contraception (33%), or condoms (21%) as their preferred methods. The proportion using their preferred method was highest among intrauterine device (IUD) users (86%) and lowest among emergency contraception users (64%). About 16% of women using permanent contraception reported it was not their preferred method. Having the lowest socioeconomic status (versus highest) (prevalence ratio [PR]: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.11-1.96), Hispanic ethnicity (versus non-Hispanic white) (PR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.15-2.90), reporting poor provider satisfaction related to contraceptive care (PR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.02-5.29), and not having a yearly women's checkup (PR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.68) were significantly associated with nonuse of preferred method. Compared to preferred-method nonusers, higher proportions of preferred-method users reported consistent contraceptive use (89% vs. 73%, p < 0.001) and intent to continue use (79% vs. 58%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Affordability and poor provider satisfaction related to contraceptive care were associated with nonuse of preferred contraceptive method. Those using their preferred method reported more consistent use.

IMPLICATIONS

Cost is an important barrier for women in obtaining their preferred contraceptive methods. Low quality birth control care may also be a barrier to preferred-method use. Removal of cost barriers and improvement in contraceptive counseling strategies may increase access to preferred contraceptive methods.

摘要

目的

我们描述了俄亥俄州使用避孕措施的 18-44 岁女性中不使用首选避孕方法的流行率和相关因素。

研究设计

2018-2019 年,具有代表性的俄亥俄州妇女调查有 2529 名参与者,回复率为 33.5%。我们检查了当前避孕使用者中不使用首选方法的流行率、不使用的原因以及对当前方法的满意度(n=1390)。我们评估了人口统计学和医疗保健因素与首选方法不使用之间的关联。

结果

约 25%的女性报告不使用她们首选的避孕方法。获得首选方法的最常见障碍是负担能力(13%)。那些不使用首选方法的人认为长效方法(49%)、口服避孕药(33%)或避孕套(21%)是他们的首选方法。宫内节育器(IUD)使用者中使用首选方法的比例最高(86%),而紧急避孕药使用者中使用首选方法的比例最低(64%)。约 16%的使用永久性避孕方法的女性报告说这不是她们的首选方法。社会经济地位最低(与最高相比)(流行比率 [PR]:1.47,95%置信区间:1.11-1.96)、西班牙裔(与非西班牙裔白人相比)(PR:1.83,95%置信区间:1.15-2.90)、报告避孕护理方面提供者满意度低(PR:2.33,95%置信区间:1.02-5.29)以及没有进行年度女性检查(PR:1.31,95%置信区间:1.01-1.68)与不使用首选方法显著相关。与不使用首选方法的女性相比,更多使用首选方法的女性报告了更一致的避孕使用(89% vs. 73%,p<0.001)和继续使用的意愿(79% vs. 58%,p<0.001)。

结论

负担能力和与避孕护理相关的提供者满意度低与不使用首选避孕方法有关。使用首选方法的人报告的使用更一致。

意义

对女性来说,成本是获得她们首选避孕方法的一个重要障碍。避孕服务质量低也可能成为首选方法使用的障碍。消除成本障碍和改进避孕咨询策略可能会增加获得首选避孕方法的机会。

相似文献

1
Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio.
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):328-335. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Factors associated with never-use of long-acting reversible contraception among adult reproductive-aged women in Ohio.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Mar;55(1):38-48. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12212. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
4
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
5
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
8
Factors associated with lack of effective contraception among obese women in the United States.
Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 14.
10
Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S884.e1-S884.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1266. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Provider-reliant contraception use among reproductive-aged women in rural Appalachian Ohio.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251351416. doi: 10.1177/17455057251351416. Epub 2025 Aug 24.
2
Examining the inaccurate reproductive health messaging of crisis pregnancy centers: A comparative qualitative study.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 5;20(6):e0325740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325740. eCollection 2025.
8
Declines in Non-marital Births Among Black Women Between 2004 and 2014: Are Recent Trends the Result of Increases in Contraception?
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022 Oct;41(5):2267-2288. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09724-4. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
Trends in Continuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescents Receiving Medicaid.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Sep;75(3):487-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.04.029. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
10
Ongoing contraceptive goals of patients who did not achieve desired postpartum permanent contraception prior to hospital discharge.
Contraception. 2024 Nov;139:110533. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110533. Epub 2024 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

2
Unsatisfied contraceptive preferences due to cost among women in the United States.
Contracept X. 2020 Jul 7;2:100032. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2020.100032. eCollection 2020.
3
Abortion Access in Ohio's Changing Legislative Context, 2010-2018.
Am J Public Health. 2020 Aug;110(8):1228-1234. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305706. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
Women's Postabortion Contraceptive Preferences and Access to Family Planning Services in Mississippi.
Womens Health Issues. 2020 May-Jun;30(3):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
5
The effect of a no-cost contraceptive initiative on method selection by women with housing insecurity.
Contraception. 2020 Mar;101(3):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
Pregnancy preferences and contraceptive use among US women.
Contraception. 2020 Feb;101(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S873-S877. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1271. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
8
Quality of postpartum contraceptive counseling and changes in contraceptive method preferences.
Contraception. 2019 Dec;100(6):492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
Unmet demand for short-acting hormonal and long-acting reversible contraception among community college students in Texas.
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Jul;66(5):360-368. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431901. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
10
Exploring young women's decisional needs for contraceptive method choice: a qualitative study.
Contraception. 2018 Mar;97(3):243-248. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验